Open Access

Citric acid: emerging applications of key biotechnology industrial product

  • Rosaria Ciriminna1,
  • Francesco Meneguzzo2,
  • Riccardo Delisi1 and
  • Mario Pagliaro1Email author
Chemistry Central Journal201711:22

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-017-0251-y

Received: 12 January 2017

Accepted: 27 February 2017

Published: 8 March 2017

Abstract

Owing to new biotechnological production units mostly located in China, global supply of citric acid in the course of the last two decades rose from less than 0.5 to more than 2 million tonnes becoming the single largest chemical obtained via biomass fermentation and the most widely employed organic acid. Critically reviewing selected research achievements and production trends, we identify the reasons for which this polycarboxylic acid will become a key chemical in the emerging bioeconomy.

Keywords

Citric acid Fermentation White biotechnology Bioeconomy

Background

Citric acid (2-hydroxy-1,2,3-propanetricarboxylic acid, C6H8O7) is an acidulant, preservative, emulsifier, flavorant, sequestrant and buffering agent widely used across many industries especially in food, beverage, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and cosmetic products [1]. First crystallized from lemon juice and named accordingly by Scheele in Sweden in 1784 [2], citric acid is a tricarboxylic acid whose central role in the metabolism of all aerobic organisms was undisclosed by Krebs in the late 1930s [3].

Owing to its remarkable physico-chemical properties and environmentally benign nature, the use of citric acid across several industrial sectors increased rapidly throughout the 19th century when the acid was directly extracted from concentrated lemon juice, mainly in Sicily (Palermo in 1930 hosted the largest citric acid plant in Europe, Palermo’s Fabbrica Chimica Italiana Goldenberg), by adding lime to precipitate calcium citrate, and then recovering the acid using diluted sulfuric acid.

Along with its elegant chemistry in aqueous and organic solutions, the history of citric acid utilization has been thoroughly recounted by Apelblat in 2014 [4]. In brief, production of citric acid from lemon juice peaked in 1915–1916 at 17,500 tonnes [5], after which it started to decline due to the introduction of the commercial production by sugar fermentation: first in 1919 by Cytromices (now known as Penicillium) mold in Belgium following the researches of Cappuyns; and then, in 1923, in New York following Currie’s discovery that strains of Aspergillus niger (the black mold, a common contaminant of foods belonging to the same family as the penicillins) in acidified solution containing small amounts of inorganic salts afforded unprecedented high yields of the acid (today, 60% on dry matter basis) [6]. Rapidly adopted by numerous other manufacturers, the fermentation process is still used nowadays across the world, and particularly in China, to meet the global demand for the acid, mainly using low cost molasses as raw materials. Interestingly, as recounted by Connor [7], a global citric acid cartel fixed prices for decades. In this study, referring to production, market and recent research achievements, we provide arguments supporting our viewpoint that citric acid will become a key chemical in the emerging bioeconomy [8], with applications beyond conventional usage in the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries.

Structure, properties and biochemical function

The crystalline structure of anhydrous citric acid, obtained by cooling hot concentrated solution of the monohydrate form, was first elucidated by Yuill and Bennett in 1934 by X-ray diffraction [9]. In 1960 Nordman and co-workers further suggested that in the anhydrous form two molecules of the acid are linked through hydrogen bonds between two –COOH groups of each monomer (Fig. 1) [10].
Fig. 1

Optimized structure of citric acid dimer from Hartree–Fock ab initio calculations

(Adapted from Ref. [12], with kind permission)

In 1994, Tarakeshwar and Manogaran published the results of the ab initio quantum chemical calculations of electron rich citric acid (and citrate trianion) approximated at the Hartree–Fock level [11]. The team found that citric acid and the citrate trianion have unique features which differentiate them from other α-carboxylic acids. The main difference between the central carboxyl group and the terminal carboxyl groups, highlighted by the ν(C=O) frequencies, was ascribed to an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the central hydroxyl hydrogen and one of the terminal carboxyl groups, with the ν(C=O) stretch frequency appearing at a lower frequency than the ν(C=O) stretch of the other terminal carboxyl.

In 2011, Bichara and co-workers published the outcomes of the structural and vibrational theoretical study for the citric acid dimer (Fig. 1) [12]. The values obtained through natural bond orbitals and atoms in molecules calculations, clearly indicate formation of the dimer through hydrogen-bond between two COOH groups of each monomer. Numerous bands of different intensities observed in the vibrational spectra not previously assigned, could now be assigned to the citric acid dimer.

Remarkably, the X-ray analyses of Nordman [10], Glusker and co-workers [13] were undertaken in the context of biochemistry studies. Citric acid, indeed, plays a central role in the biochemical cycle discovered by Krebs in 1937.

The citric acid cycle, as lately suggested by Estrada, performs “a kind of concentration” in a self-amplifying cycle in which citrate “pulls in carbon and then it splits, and both parts go back into the cycle, so where you had one you now have two” [14]. Indeed, Fig. 2 reproduced from a 1972 article [15], neatly explains that the sequence of reactions in the Krebs cycle consumes the load of the “carrier” (the four-carbon skeleton of oxalacetate) by transforming it into two molecules of CO2, with the unloaded carrier left in oxalacetate form, ready to be loaded again with two-carbon acetyl group.
Fig. 2

The citric acid cycle devised by Nafissy in 1972, in which the four-carbon skeleton of oxalacetate is a four-wheel carrier to be loaded with two carbon atoms of acetyl group to form the six carbon citrate

(Reproduced from Ref. [15], with kind permission)

Production, properties and applications

Due its eminent biochemical role, it is perhaps not surprising that citric acid is widely distributed in animal species, plants and fruits (Table 1).
Table 1

Citric acid in different fruits

Reproduced from Ref. [17], with kind permission

Fruit

Citric acid content (mg/100 mL)

Lime

7000

Lemon

5630

Raspberry

2480

Tomato

1018

Pineapple, strawberry, cranberry

200–650

Since the late 1920s, however, the carbohydrate fermentation route has replaced extraction from lemon juice. So efficient and affordable was the new process that as early as of 1934 the acid production cost, using today’s currency values, was €0.2/kg vs. €1.0/kg of 1920 when the acid was still obtained from lemon juice [16]. Today, citric acid is produced at large chemical fermentation plants (Fig. 3) and eventually isolated in two forms, anhydrous and monohydrate. A typical bioreactor is comprised of a batch fermenter (100 m3) charged with diluted molasses and minor amounts of inorganic nutrients to which, typically, 5–25 × 106 A. niger spores/L are inoculated keeping the reactor under constant stirring (at 50–100 rpm to avoid shear damage on molds). Aeration is supplied to the fermenter by air sparging whereas temperature is kept at 25–27 °C by cooling coils. The production cycle takes from 5 to 8 days depending on the plant, generally affording volumetric yields of 130 kg/m3.
Fig. 3

Citric acid plant ‘Citrobel’ in Belgorod (Russia)

reproduced from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/29247054, with kind permission

To recover the acid from the fermentation broth, a first precipitation with lime is followed by acidification with H2SO4 and ion exchange, decoloration and crystallisation. The acid is generally sold as a white powder comprised of anyhydrous or monohydrate form typically available in 25 kg paper bags or large (500–1000 kg) bags.

In general, the fermentation process generates twice the volume amount of by-products originating both from the carbohydrate raw material and from the downstream process in the form of a solid sludge (gypsum and organic impurities). All co-products are sold for technical, agricultural and feed applications. The organic part of the molasses, after concentration, is sold as a binding agent for feed. The protein rich mycelium resulting is sold as animal feed, while gypsum is marketed as a filler in cement or in medical applications.

In 2012 Ray and co-workers were noting that the increasing demand required “more efficient fermentation process and genetically modified microorganisms for higher yield and purity” [17]. However, while it is true that numerous citric acid suppliers use molasses from genetically modified corn and genetically modified sugar beet, other manufacturers produce only citrate products certified to originate from carbohydrates obtained from non-genetically modified crops and without any involvement of microorganisms derived from recombinant DNA technology.

Odourless and colourless citric acid is highly soluble in water (62.07% at 25 °C) [18] and slightly hygroscopic. From an environmental viewpoint, the acid quickly degrades in surface waters, and poses no hazards to the environment or to human health [19]. Once dissolved in water, it shows weak acidity but a strongly acid taste which affects sweetness and provides a fruity tartness for which it is widely used to complement fruit flavours in the food and beverage industry. In combination with citrate, the acid shows excellent buffering capacity, while its excellent metal ions chelating properties add to the physico-chemical properties that make it ideally suited for food, cosmetic, nutraceutical and pharmaceutical applications (Table 2), whose number testifies to its exquisite versatility. The acid has the E330 food ingredient code in the European Union (E331 and E332, respectively, for sodium and potassium citrate) indicating a food additive that may be used quantum satis. Similarly, it has the GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) status in the US. It is somehow ironic that citric acid, once extracted from lemon juice, today is rather added to most lemon, lime or citrus soft drinks at 0.1–0.4% dosage levels. The acid indeed allows to enhance the tangy flavour and to retain quality due to metal ion sequestering properties which help in preventing oxidation that causes flavour and colour loss.
Table 2

Main applications of citric acid and related chemical function

Application

Reason

Pharmaceutically active substances, pharmaceuticals, personal care and cosmetic products

Many APIs are supplied as their citrate salt. Effervescent tablets and preparations (via reaction with bicarbonate or carbonate), aiding the dissolution of APIs and improving palatability. Effervescent systems are widely used in teeth-cleaning products, pain relief and vitamin tablets. Very effective buffering system for pH control used in a wide range of for improving stability

Food

Enhancing the activity of antioxidant preservatives (citrate powerful chelating agent for trace metal ions)

Flavouring agent

Sharp, acid taste of citric acid can help mask the unpleasant, medicinal taste of pharmaceuticals

Diuretic

Potassium citrate has diuretic properties

Blood anticoagulant

Citrate chelates calcium, reducing the tendency for blood to clot

Environmental remediation

Chelating agent sequestering heavy metals, including radioactive isotopes, easing also removal of hydrophobic organic compounds

Beverage

Acidulant and pH stabilizer

Compared to the numerous applications identified by Soccol and co-workers in 2006 [20], in the subsequent decade the significant decrease in price and increase in production has opened the route to several new usages of citric acid that had remained idle due to prolonged high prices.

Emerging uses

Research on new uses and applications of citric acid is currently flourishing, as testified for example by new books published [4], following the still very relevant book written in 1975 by two leading industry’s practitioners [21]. A first noticeable new use is in household detergents and dishwashing cleaners (approximately 13% of the global citric acid market) as a co-builder with zeolites, mainly in concentrated liquid detergents. Citric acid acts as builder, chelating water hardness Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions but, contrarily to phosphate builders, it does not contribute to the eutrophication of acquatic systems. Since 2017, furthermore, phosphates in dishwasher detergents already banned in the US (since 2010) will be banned in the EU too, leading to increasing consumption of citric acid [22], that will add to increasing use of citrate in domestic cleaners. Numerous other applications will follow. In the following, we provide three examples of recent innovative uses of citric acid that are likely to lead to a further significant market expansion.

Cross-linker

Citric acid is successfully applied to crosslink many other materials, including ultrafine protein fibers for biomedical applications [23], polyols for making biodegradable films suitable for example for for eco-friendly packaging [24], and with hydroxyapatite to make bioceramic composites for orthopedic tissue engineering [25].

Goyanes and co-workers simply cross-linked citric acid with starch using glycerol as plasticizer by heating a mixture of starch, glycerol, water and citric acid at 75–85 °C. The resulting films with citric acid processed at 75 °C showed a significant decrease in both moisture absorption and water vapor permeability, namely the two main parameters affecting the barrier properties of packaging films. Crosslinking the starch–glycerol films with citric acid, furthermore, significantly improves the poor thermal degradation and mechanical properties of starch films [26].

A significant new application of citric acid as crosslinking agent was discovered in 2011 by Rothenberg and Alberts at the University of Amsterdam, who found that glycerol and citric acid polymerize to form a thermoset resin, soluble in water, showing several important properties including quick degradation in the environment. Until the introduction of this thermoset, nearly all biodegradable plastics have been thermoplastic polymers. Combining citric acid dissolved in glycerol at a temperature above the boiling point of water at ambient pressure and below 130 °C gives a hard polyester resin by a straightforward Fisher esterification process [27]. The boiling points of glycerol (290 °C) and the decomposition temperature of citric acid (175 °C) ensure that water is the only compound liberated as steam, as no decarboxylation takes place at T < 150 °C.

The resulting polymer is a “bio-bakelite”, a hard three-dimensional polyester which adheres to other materials and can therefore be used in combination with steel, glass, metals and other solid materials used for making inflexible plastic items such as computer and telephone casings, insulation foam, trays, tables and lamps. The extent of crosslinking is controlled by the reaction conditions, most notably temperature, reaction time, and glycerol:citric acid ratio. The higher the extent of crosslinking, the lower the rate of degradation in water. Highly crosslinked samples (Fig. 4) can survive for months in water, and indefinitely in air.
Fig. 4

Pawns made of wood next to other samples made of Glycix-GX, the new thermoset resin obtained from citric acid and glycerol

(Image courtesy of Professor Gadi Rothenberg)

Dubbed “Plantics-GX” by the start-up manufacturing company Plantics, the resin is currently produced on tonne scale at a pilot plant in the Netherlands. The polymer is also inherently safe as it bears no N atom and no S atoms, so there is no possibility of toxic gases during combustion. Full biodegradability ensures that the composite can be disposed of as organic waste as the material hydrolyzes in water making the bio-based particulate available for biological degradation.

Disinfectant

Citric acid is an excellent, harmless disinfectant against several viruses, including human norovirus. For example, added to norovirus-like particles, citrate precisely binds at the binding pocket on the histo-blood group antigens involved in attaching to host ligands, preventing the transmission of these viruses, as well as reducing symptoms in those already infected with noroviruses [28]. In detail, citrate was also found to bind the norovirus P domain, pointing to a broad reactivity among diverse noroviruses. Easily transmitted through contaminated hands or contaminated food, noroviruses cause frequent gastroenteritis outbreaks in community settings such as hospitals, cruise ships, and schools. A commercial paper tissue, containing a middle layer impregnated with citric acid (7.51%) and sodium lauryl sulphate (2.02%), kills the viruses emitted in the form of tiny droplets in the tissue paper after sneezing, coughing or blowing of the nose into the tissue. When moisture hits the middle layer, sodium lauryl sulphate disrupts the lipid envelope of many viruses, whereas citric acid disrupts rhinoviruses, which do not have a lipid envelope, but are sensitive to acids, thereby preventing transfer back to the hands and to surfaces with which the tissue comes into contact [29]. The biocidal product can also be used for the disinfection of surfaces where cold and flu viruses can survive for more than 24 h.

Environmental remediation

Due to its excellent metal chelating properties, citric acid is widely used to clean industrial sites, including nuclear sites contaminated with radionuclides [30], and soils polluted with heavy metals. For example, not only the citric moiety facilitates the removal of metals in soils [31], but it also enhances the soil desorption of hydrophobic organic compounds from soils [32]. Further enhancing the potential to remove mixed contaminants from soils, recent research in China has shown that when combined with rhamnolipid biosurfactants, citric acid affords unprecedented capacity in soil environmental remediation (better than most thermal or chemical treatments) through biobased chemical agents that are not only environmentally compatible, but also promote soil ecological restoration after remediation [33].

Extracting agent

In 2005, Brazilian researchers first showed that citric acid can be successfully used in place of toxic mineral acids to recover pectin from apple pomace [34]. Pectin extraction yield with citric acid showed the highest average value (13.75%, Fig. 5). Although nitric acid sometimes showed the highest yield, the associated variability was very large, let alone the harmful effluents generated.
Fig. 5

Effect of the nature of acid on pectin extraction yield

(Reproduced from Ref. [34], with kind permission)

Pectin is extracted under reflux in a condensation system at 97 °C (solute/solvent 1:50), using water acidified with citric acid to pH 2.5, and apple flour as raw material. The optimal citric acid concentration is 62 g/L. After 150 min, pectin with excellent degree of esterification (DE = 68.84%) was isolated. Remarkably, the pectin yield was significantly higher using flour as raw material in place of the pomace, as protopectin is more available in small particles than in large ones. Due to its chemical properties and health beneficial effects, the use of pectin is growing across many industrial sectors [35], while its scarcity on the market due to obsolete production processes generating large amounts of waste has recently led to unprecedented high prices.

Produce preservative

The use of citric acid to reduce microbiological activity, thereby enhancing the stability of concentrates, is well known for example to orange juice makers, who add the acid to concentrates delivered to customers in the beverage industry. Formulated along with other ingredients, citric acid affords an effective commercial antioxidant (NatureSeal), which preserves the aspect (texture and colour) and the organoleptic qualities of several fruits, making them appearing fresh. In tests with fresh-cut apples, for example, the inhibitor out-performs both ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and citric acid when used alone [36].

Another important recent advance is the aqueous solution of citric acid, lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide and a proprietary hydrogen peroxide stabilizer (to slow the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen gas, Eq. 1), comprising a produce wash (First Step + 10), whose antimicrobial effect is due to the formation of perorganic acids (Eq. 2) [37].
$${\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}_{ 2} \to {\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{O }} + {\text{ O}}_{ 2}$$
(1)
$${\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}_{ 2} + {\text{ R}} - {\text{COOH}} \to {\text{R}} - {\text{COOOH }} + {\text{ H}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}$$
(2)

Buffered citric acid makes bacteria membranes more vulnerable to leakage, keeps the wash water within pH 4.0 inhibiting bacterial growth, while the powerful oxidizing agents perorganic acid and hydrogen peroxide quickly penetrate the lipid bilayer membrane providing rapid inactivation of foodborne pathogenic bacteria, including human pathogens such as Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli. After the produce wash is applied to the raw produce and allowed to drain, the constituent ingredients break down into water, oxygen, and organic acids. No toxic compounds are released to the environment. Indeed, in late 2015, the manufacturing company received a positive food-contact substance notification [38].

Market and bioeconomy aspects

In 1998 the citric acid market was still held by an oligopoly of companies based in North America and western Europe, when one firm in North America and three in Europe were pled guilty of fixing prices and output levels of citric acid in the US and EU from mid-1991 till 1995 [7]. Shortly afterwards, the market oligopoly was disrupted by the entrance of Chinese manufacturers (Table 3) [39].
Table 3

Citric acid plant closures until 2010

Reproduced from Ref. [39], with kind permission

Continent

Country

Company

City

Capacity (t)

Year of closure

Feedstock

Europe

France

Jungbunzlauer

Marckolsheim

40,000

2001

Wheat, maize

Europe

Ireland

ADM

Ringaskiddy

40,000

2005

Molasses

Europe

Spain

Ebro

Cortes

5000

1991

Beet molasses

Europe

UK

Tate & Lyle

Selby

25,000

2007

Molasses

America

Mexico

Tate & Lyle

Cuernavaca

22,000

2003

Molasses

America

US

Haarman & Reimer (Bayer)

Elkhardt

40,000

1998

Maize starch

Asia

China

DSM

Wuxi

40,000

2009

Maize starch

Asia

India

Citric India

Mumbai

3000

1997

Cane molasses

Asia

India

Citrugia biochemicals

Surat

6300

2003

Cane molasses

Asia

India

Gujarat State fertiliser & chemicals

Baroda

12,000

2004

Cane molasses

World

   

233,300

  
Put briefly, while in 1989 the world production of citric acid and citrate salts amounted to about 0.5 million tonnes, in 2015 it exceeded 2 million tonnes, with the global market expected to increase at 3.7% annual rate at least until 2020 [40]. In 2015, China accounted for 59% of world production and for 74% of world exports, hosting the largest producers (Table 4). The only new plant not built in China in the course of the last decade is the 12,000 t/a plant in Kermanshah, Iran.
Table 4

World’s main citric acid manufacturers and country headquarter

Company

Country headquarter

Gadot Biochemical Industries

Israel

Weifang Ensign Industry

China

Huangshi Xinghua Biochemical

China

RZBC

China

Anhui COFCO Biochemical

China

Cargill

USA

ADM

USA

Citrique Belge

Belgium

Jungbunzlauer

Switzerland

Tate & Lyle

UK

The sudden abundance of the product, with production output almost doubled in the 2004–2013 decade, led to unprecedented low prices that in 2015 bottomed out at $700/t [41]. As in the case of solar photovoltaic modules [42], manufacturers in Europe and in North America were the petitioners in the investigation of anti-dumping duties imposed on products shipped by Chinese companies, lamenting unfair government subsidies and loans to China’s firms. In Europe, for example, the market investigation [43] carried out by the European Commission in 2008 found out that Chinese domestic prices were around 48% lower than those in the EU market. Since June 2008, duties of almost 50% were applied on Chinese citric acid imports.

Commenting on the impact of said tariffs and imposing definitive duties (varying between 15.3 and 42.7%) in early 2015, EU officers were writing that “the Union industry has recovered from the injury caused by the past dumping of Chinese exporting producers” [44]. Yet, in mid-2016, workers in Belgium at one of the few manufacturing sites left in Europe started a blockade [45]. Similar duties exist for example in the US [46], in South Africa and Brazil. In the latter country, on June 2016 antidumping duties of $803.61 and $823.04/t were applied to two Chinese companies found to be violating the provisions determined in 2012, when both were found part of an existent price undertaking [47].

Outlook and conclusions

Reviewing selected research achievements and market trends, this study provides a critical overview on citric acid. Obtained from molasses via fermentation on black mold, with its 2 million tonnes yearly output, citric acid is the main biotechnology product of the chemical industry and, in our viewpoint, a key chemical of the nascent bioeconomy. The global and strong demand of consumers for naturals, namely for functional products which are beneficial, and not harmful, both to health and to the environment, will continue to drive the demand of citric acid as ingredient in beverage, food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic products. Second, low price and abundance will originate a number of new, large-scale applications of the highly functionalized citric acid molecule, often in combination with other natural products and green chemicals, such as H2O2 [48], to formulate new preservatives and antioxidants.

The entry into the international market of new China-based manufacturers has reshaped a chemical market which had existed in its oligopoly state for about 80 years since the inception, in the 1920s, of the commercial fermentation process in western Europe and in the US. Likewise to what happened with photovoltaic (PV) modules, wherein tariffs rapidly enforced in the EU and in the US did not stop global expansion of solar PV energy to unprecedented levels [49], low price of citric acid boosted its adoption in market segments and world’s regions where it was not traditionally used due to high price, including many south east Asia Pacific countries and Russia, the world’s largest country, which to the best of our knowledge hosts only one citric acid plant (Fig. 3). In conclusion, we argue, existing manufacturers in China will neither reduce production capacity built in the course of the last decade, nor production outputs; but they will rather adapt to prolonged low prices, by increasing the efficiency of the production process. The cost of the raw materials (molasses, A. niger water and sulfuric acid) is low and their availability practically unlimited. Under these industrial and market circumstances, developing environmentally friendly chemical technologies based on this eminent green chemical is an important task for today’s chemistry and biotechnology scholars engaged in contemporary sustainable chemistry and green technology research.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MP conceived the idea for the review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This article is dedicated to Dr. Francesco Vadalà, AMG Energia (Palermo), for all he has done to support the work of one of us (M.P.) during his presidency.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

All Authors consent to the publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable (ethics). All Authors consented to participate.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Istituto per lo Studio dei Materiali Nanostrutturati, CNR
(2)
Istituto di Biometeorologia, CNR

References

  1. Verhoff FH (2005) Citric acid, Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  2. Scheele CW (1784) “Anmärkning om Citron-Saft, samt sätt att crystallisera den samma” (Note on lemon juice, as well as ways to crystallize the same). Kongliga Vetenskaps Academiens Nya Handlingar 5:105–109Google Scholar
  3. Thauer RK (1988) Citric-acid cycle, 50 years on. Eur J Biochem 176:497–508View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Apelblat A (2014) Citric acid. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Cham, p 11Google Scholar
  5. di San Amat, Filippo P (1998) The Italian chemical industry in the chemical industry in Europe 1850–1914. In: Homburg E, Travis AS, Schröter HG (eds) Industrial growth, pollution, and professionalization. Springer Science+Business Media, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Roehr M (1998) A century of citric acid fermentation and research. Food Technol Biotechnol 36:173–181Google Scholar
  7. Connor JM (1998) The global citric acid conspiracy: legal-economic lessons. Agribusiness 14:435–452View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. McCormick K, Kautto N (2013) The bioeconomy in Europe: an overview. Sustainability 5:2589–2608View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett GM, Yuill JL (1935) The crystal form of anhydrous citric acid. J Chem Soc 130:130View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Nordman CE, Weldon AS, Patterson AL (1960) X-ray crystal analysis of the substrates of aconitase-I. Rubidium dihydrogen citrate. Acta Crystallogr 13:414–417View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tarakeshwar P, Manogaran S (1994) Ground state vibrations of citric acid and the citrate trianion—an ab initio study Spectrochim. Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc 50:2327–2343View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bichara LC, Lanús HE, Ferrer EG, Gramajo MB, Brandán SA (2011) Vibrational study and force field of the citric acid dimer based on the SQM methodology. Adv Phys Chem 2011:347072View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Glusker JP, Minkin JA, Patterson AL (1969) X-ray crystal analysis of the substrates of aconitase-9. A refinement of the structure of anhydrous citric acid. Acta Crystallogr Sect B 25:1066–1072View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Estrada D https://plus.google.com/+DanielEstrada/posts/5Ew24jZPG4F. Accessed 10 July 2016
  15. Nafissy R (1972) Schematic presentation of the citric acid cycle. J Chem Educ 49:620View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bauweleers H (16 Sept 2015) Industrial biotech in Tienen. Flanders investment and trade meeting, TienenGoogle Scholar
  17. Swain MR, Ray RC, Patra JK (2012) Citric acid: microbial production and applications in food and pharmaceutical industries. In: Vargas DA, Medina JV (eds) Citric acid: synthesis properties and applications. Nova Science Publisher, Zagreb, pp 97–118Google Scholar
  18. Dalman LH (1937) The solubility of citric and tartaric acids in water. J Am Chem Soc 59:2547–2549View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Citric acid (2001) CAS No: 77-92-9. OECD Screening Information Dataset (SIDS), ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. Soccol CR, Vandenberghe LPS, Rodrigues C, Pandey A (2006) Citric acid production. Food Technol Biotechnol 44:141–149Google Scholar
  21. Blair GT, Zienty ME (1975) Citric acid: properties and reactions, Citrotech division. Miles Laboratories, Inc, ElkhartGoogle Scholar
  22. Euromonitor Research (17 April 2014) Western European Phosphate Ban to Reward Innovative Formulations. euromonitor.com, Euromonitor International, London. http://blog.euromonitor.com/2014/04/western-european-phosphate-ban-to-reward-innovative-formulations.html. Accessed 6 Mar 2017
  23. Reddy N, Reddy R, Jiang Q (2015) Crosslinking biopolymers for biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol 33:362–369View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Seligra PG, Medina Jaramillo C, Famá L, Goyanes S (2016) Biodegradable and non-retrogradable eco-films based on starch–glycerol with citric acid as crosslinking agent. Carbohydr Polym 138:66–74View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sun D, Chen Y, Tran RT, Xu S, Xie D, Jia C, Wang Y, Guo Y, Zhang Z, Guo J, Yang J, Jin D, Bai X (2014) Citric acid-based hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds enhance calvarial regeneration. Sci Rep 4:6912View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Seligra PG, Medina Jaramillo C, Famá L, Goyanes S (2016) Data of thermal degradation and dynamic mechanical properties of starch–glycerol based films with citric acid as crosslinking agent. Data Brief 7:1331–1334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Alberts AH, Rothenberg G (2012) Process for preparing foamed polymer, WO 2012052385Google Scholar
  28. Koromyslova AD, White PA, Hansman GS (2015) Treatment of norovirus particles with citrate. Virology 485:199–204View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. (2005) Antiviral KLEENEX. Med Lett Drugs Ther 47(1199):3–4Google Scholar
  30. Kantar C, Honeyman BD (2006) Citric acid enhanced remediation of soils contaminated with uranium by soil flushing and soil washing. J Environ Eng 132:247–255View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Chen YX, Lin Q, Luo YM, He YF, Zhen SJ, Yu YL, Tian GM, Wong MH (2003) The role of citric acid on the phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil. Chemosphere 50:807–811View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gao YZ, Ren LL, Ling WT, Kang FX, Zhu XZ, Sun BQ (2010) Effects of low-molecular-weight organic acids on sorption–desorption of phenanthrene in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:51–59View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wan J, Meng D, Long T, Ying R, Ye M, Zhang S, Li Q, Zhou Y, Lin Y (2015) Simultaneous removal of lindane, lead and cadmium from soils by rhamnolipids combined with citric acid. PLoS ONE 10(6):e0129978View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Canteri-Schemin MH, Ramos Fertonani HC, Waszczynskyj N, Wosiacki G (2005) Extraction of pectin from apple pomace. Braz Arch Biol Technol 48:259–266View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ciriminna R, Chavarría-Hernández N, Rodríguez Hernández A, Pagliaro M (2015) Pectin: a new perspective from the biorefinery standpoint. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 9:368–377View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Rossle C, Gormley TR, Butler F (2009) Efficacy of Natureseal AS1 browning inhibitor in fresh-cut fruit salads applications, with emphasis on apple wedges. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 84:62–67View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Gurtler J, Bailey R, Dong X, Santos S (2016) Minimum effective concentrations of a new fresh produce wash (first step + 10). IAFP 2016, St. Louis, p 1–35Google Scholar
  38. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2015) FCN No. 1558, Mantrose-Haeuser Co., Inc., Inventory of Effective Food Contact Substance (FCS), August 26, 2015Google Scholar
  39. Licht Interactive Data—Plants and Projects (2013) http://stage.renewablechemicals.agra-net.com/chinese-citric-acid-industry-begins-to-consolidate/
  40. Markit IHS (2015) Citric Acid-Chemical Economics Handbook. IHS Markit, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. China Chemicals Market, CCM (2016) China’s capacity expansion projects on citric acid progress slowly, Guangzhou 18 March 2016Google Scholar
  42. Gang C (2015) China’s Solar PV manufacturing and subsidies from the perspective of state capitalism. Cph J Asian Stud 33(1):90–104Google Scholar
  43. Commission Regulation (EC) No 488/2008 of 2 June 2008 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China. Official Journal of the European Union, L 143, 3 June 2008, p 13Google Scholar
  44. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/82 of 21 January 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China, Official Journal of the European Union, L 15, 22 January 2015, p 8Google Scholar
  45. (2 June 2016). "Tirlemont: les travailleurs de Citrique Belge bloquent l’accès à l’entreprise". L’avenir. http://www.lavenir.net/cnt/dmf20160602_00835464/tirlemont-les-travailleurs-de-citrique-belge-bloquent-l-acces-a-l-entreprise. Accessed 6 Mar 2017
  46. US International Trade Commission (2015) Citric acid and certain citrate salts from Canada and China. News Release 15–044, Washington, DC: May 21, 2015Google Scholar
  47. Secretary for Foreign Trade of the Brazilian Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade, Circular No. 71 of 24 November 2016, Diário Oficial, 28 November 2016. http://www.mdic.gov.br/images/REPOSITORIO/secex/gab/circulares_secex_2016/circ_secex_071_2016.pdf. Accessed 6 Mar 2017
  48. Ciriminna R, Albanese L, Meneguzzo F, Pagliaro M (2016) Hydrogen peroxide: a key chemical for today’s sustainable development. ChemSusChem 9:3374–3381View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Meneguzzo F, Ciriminna R, Albanese L, Pagliaro M (2015) The great solar boom: a global perspective into the far reaching impact of an unexpected energy revolution. Energy Sci Eng 3:499–509View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017