Open Access

New eco-friendly animal bone meal catalysts for preparation of chalcones and aza-Michael adducts

  • Yassine Riadi1, 2,
  • Younes Abrouki3,
  • Rachid Mamouni3,
  • Mohammadine El Haddad4,
  • Sylvain Routier2,
  • Gérald Guillaumet2Email author and
  • Saïd Lazar1Email author
Contributed equally
Chemistry Central Journal20126:60

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-6-60

Received: 1 May 2012

Accepted: 11 June 2012

Published: 21 June 2012

Abstract

Two efficient reactions were successfully carried out using Animal Bone Meal (ABM) and potassium fluoride or sodium nitrate doped ABMs as new heterogeneous catalysts under very mild conditions. After preparation and characterization of the catalysts, we first report their use in a simple and convenient synthesis of various chalcones by Claisen–Schmidt condensation and then in an aza-Michael addition involving several synthesized chalcones with aromatic amines. All the reactions were carried out at room temperature in methanol; the chalcone synthesis was also achieved in water environment under microwave irradiation. Doping ABM enhances the rate and yield at each reaction. Catalytic activities are discussed and the ability to re-use the ABM is demonstrated.

Results

For Claisen–Schmidt the use of ABM alone, yields never exceeded 17%. In each entry, KF/ABM and NaNO3/ABM (79-97%) gave higher yields than using ABM alone under thermic condition. Also the reaction proceeded under microwave irradiation in good yields (72-94% for KF/ABM and 81-97% for NaNO3/ABM) and high purity. For aza-Michael addition the use of ABM doped with KF or NaNO3 increased the catalytic activity remarkably. The very high yields could be noted (84-95% for KF/ABM and 81-94% for NaNO3/ABM).

Conclusion

The present method is an efficient and selective procedure for the synthesis of chalcones an aza-Michael adducts. The ABM and doped ABMs are a new, inexpensive and attractive solid supports which can contribute to the development of catalytic processes and reduced environmental problems.

Background

Heterogeneous catalytic reactions are interesting due to their well-documented advantages over homogeneous catalytic systems [13]. Animal Bone Meal (ABM) has emerged as an ideal basic heterogeneous catalyst as it is easily available in nature. The positive features of ABM also include high stability, ease of handling and regeneration, nontoxicity and the absence of other environmental hazards.

Our group has recently developed the preparation and use of Animal Bone Meal as a natural catalyst for C-S bond formation by thia-Michael addition [4], as a catalyst for crossed-aldol condensation [5], and as catalyst for synthesis of benzimidazoles, benzoxazoles, and benzothiazoles [6]. This new natural heterogeneous method led to β-sulfinyl adducts, α,α’-bis(substituted benzylidene)cyclo-alkanones, benzimidazoles, benzoxazoles, and benzothiazoles in very high yields after only a few minutes at room temperature.

As an extension of our research program concerning the development of this natural catalyst, we report in this paper two successive ABM catalyzed reactions (Scheme 1). In order to determine the best catalytic system, recycling assays, modifications of several parameters such as temperature, thermal or microwave irradiation and choice of solvents were investigated.

The first novel ABM catalyzed reaction led to chalcones 3 which constitute an important class of biologically active compounds [712]. They are commonly synthesized by Claisen-Schmidt condensation between acetophenones 1 and aromatic aldehydes 2 under acidic and basic homogeneous conditions or using basic heterogeneous catalysts.

Alumina [13], barium hydroxide [1417], hydrotalcite [18], zeolite [19] natural phosphate either alone or activated with an ammonium salt [20] and hydroxyapatite derivatives [2123] were previously used in heterogeneous reactions to facilitate separation and obtain pure products.

Scheme 1 (a) Claisen-Schmidt condensation catalyzed by ABM, KF/ABM or NaNO3/ABM; (b) Aza-Michael addition by ABM, KF/ABM or NaNO3/ABM catalyst.

The second new ABM catalyzed reaction we tried is the Michael addition of an aromatic amine 4 on a chalcone 3 for the synthesis of β-amino carbonyl compounds 5. Previously, similar reactions have been carried out with no special activation (limited cases) [23, 24] but most of them required a Lewis acid [2527] and other stronger reaction conditions [28, 29] to promote conjugation addition of amines to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds. Solvent-free reactions, heterogeneous solid acids, ionic liquids, and high temperature have also been used to promote this reaction [30].

Unfortunately, as shown previously, many of these Claisen-Schmidt and aza-Michael procedures often required an excess of reagents, long reaction times, and used expensive heavy metal salts and drastic reaction conditions. The development of a simpler, eco-friendly and efficient catalytic method for the Claisen-Schmidt and aza-Michael reactions is therefore highly desirable. ABM and doped ABM could offer a good alternative in this respect.

Catalyst preparation - characterization

ABM process preparation [31] offers the possibility to obtain a modified catalyst. KF/ABM and NaNO3/ABM doped bones were prepared by impregnating the natural product with an aqueous solution of potassium fluoride or sodium nitrate respectively. The mixture was stirred vigorously at room temperature, evaporated to dryness, dried and calcined at 800°C for 2 h. to obtain two novel active catalysts.

In order to determine the best ratio r = m0 (KF or NaNO3)/m1 (ABM), we carried out the synthesis of chalcone 3a by condensation of benzaldehyde and acetophenone at room temperature in the presence of methanol (1 mL) and KF/ABM or NaNO3/ABM (50 mg) with weight ratios r = 3/4, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/6, 1/8, 1/10, 1/15 and 0 (ABM alone) respectively. In the presence of NaNO3 or KF alone, no product was observed under the reaction conditions; only the starting material was isolated (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Yields of 3a using KF/ABM and NaNO 3 /ABM with different weight ratios.

The conversion of the starting materials is maximal for a weight ratio KF or NaNO3/bones = 1/2. The new catalysts obtained under these conditions were characterized by X-ray diffraction (Figure 2).
Figure 2

(A) X-Ray diffraction patterns of ABM (B) X-Ray diffraction patterns of KF/ABM and (C) X-Ray diffraction patterns of NaNO 3 /ABM at weight ratio = 0.5.

We previously reported the elemental analysis of ABM which showed high levels of phosphate (56.3%) and calcium (36.8%), with a Ca/P ratio of 1.55. Only strong characteristic phosphate bands were observed in X-Ray spectra using doped ABMs. X-Ray diffraction analysis confirmed the presence of hydroxyapatite without solid material modifications.

The only remarkable fact is that the main modifications in the X-Ray diffraction patterns of KF/ABM and NaNO3/ABM are produced in the range of 2θ = 32–35°, in this range we have new lines with an increase in the intensity of other lines in that zone. These lines may correspond to sodium or potassium phosphate species.

Optimizations for abms catalyzed Claisen-Schmidt condensations

Having thus demonstrated the ability to convert benzophenone and benzaldehyde into 3a using the three newly prepared ABMs, we next envisioned optimizing the process of the reaction.

The reaction was therefore carried out using an equimolar amount of benzaldehyde and acetophenone (1.0 mmol) in various quantities of methanol. In the absence of solvent the reaction failed. The addition of methanol enhanced the yield up to 1.5-2.5 mL which appeared to be the best volume for achieving complete conversion of the starting material and obtaining 3a in near quantitative yields. Efficient solvation of the reagents and contact optimizations between the active sites of the catalyst and the organic substrates could explain this result. Beyond 2 mL of MeOH, the dispersion phenomenon leads to a decrease in yields.
Figure 3

Volume of MeOH effect on chalcone 3a synthesis.

Various chalcones 3 were then prepared by reacting arylaldehydes 1 on ketones 2 in the presence of methanol as the solvent and catalyst (i.e. ABM or KF or NaNO3 doped ABMs) at room temperature (Figure 3). Under similar conditions in the absence of the catalysts, only the starting material was recovered, thus highlighting the role of this catalyst. At the end of the reaction a solvent addition, filtration and evaporation were realized in order to easily quantify the yield all the products were characterized using standard 1 H, 13 C NMR and IR spectrometry after re-crystallization.
Table 1

Synthesis of chalcones 3 in presence of ABM, KF/ABM or NaNO 3 /ABM at room temperature in MeOH

Entry

 

Product

 

Yieldsa (%)/Time (h)

 

N° [ref]

X

Y

ABM

KF/ABM

NaNO3/ABM

1

3a[32]

H

H

15/24

97/12

96/12

2

3b[33]

NO2

H

13/12

93/6

91/5

3

3c[32]

OCH3

H

5/12

94/9

91/6

4

3d[32]

Cl

H

10/12

90/6

93/6

5

3e[33]

CH3

H

5/12

91/9

86/9

6

3f[34]

F

H

17/12

90/6

92/6

7

3g[35]

H

NO2

6/12

97/6

95/6

8

3h[32]

OCH3

NO2

4/12

94/6

92/6

9

3i[35]

Cl

NO2

8/12

93/6

89/8

10

3j[36]

NO2

NO2

11/12

94/6

97/6

11

3k[37]

CH3

NO2

5/12

96/9

92/9

12

3l[38]

F

NO2

17/12

90/16

87/12

13

3m[32]

H

OCH3

9/12

85/12

88/12

14

3n[39]

NO2

OCH3

17/12

88/12

82/12

15

3o[32]

Cl

OCH3

2/12

89/12

91/12

16

3p[39]

CH3

OCH3

6/12

79/16

87/16

17

3q[32]

OCH3

OCH3

4/12

86/16

79/16

18

3r[40]

F

OCH3

14/12

92/12

94/12

a Yields refer to isolated compounds.

Using ABM alone, yields never exceeded 17%. In each entry, KF/ABM and NaNO3/ABM gave higher yields than using ABM alone (Table 1). With our new catalysts, the reaction worked efficiently at room temperature in good yields, affording chalcones 3 in high purity. In the case of the synthesis of chalcones 3a, 3l–3r, the kinetic reactions were slowed down and required more time. The presence of an electron-donor group on acetophenones 2m-2r (−OCH3) decreased their reactivity towards benzaldehydes whereas an electron-acceptor group such as -NO2 increased the reactivity of the corresponding acetophenones (2g-2k) except in case 2l.

In general, it appeared that KF/ABM and NaNO3/ABM were more active than ABM, and that the addition of KF or NaNO3 to ABM also increased the activity of the heterogeneous catalysts.

Recovering and re-using the solid catalyst is one of the major interests of heterogeneous catalysis. For this purpose, the synthesis of 3a was carried out using fresh and recovered catalyst NaNO3/ABM. The NaNO3/ABM was quantitatively recovered by simple filtration and regenerated by calcination at 400°C for two hours for each new reuse (usage).
Table 2

Studies on the reuse of NaNO3/ABM in the synthesis of chalcone 3a

Entry

Round

Yield (%)

Recovered NaNO3/ABM (%)

1

1

96

97

2

2

96

96

3

3

92

94

4

4

89

89

5

5

81

83

After the third recycling procedure, the yield of the reaction and the amount recovered NaNO3/ABM decreased slowly (Table 2). Nevertheless, the recycling procedure proved its efficiency and it should be noted that even in the fifth round of reuse of the catalyst the corresponding product 3a was obtained in fairly good yield.

Even if chalcone synthesis proved its efficiency at room temperature, we next sought to find other conditions including replacing the organic solvent with water. For this new objective, a mixture of aldehydes 1, acetophenones 2 (2.5 mmol) and doped ABMs was prepared in water and the suspension irradiated under microwave for the proper time at temperature 160°C and under pressure 10 bar. Simple purification led to the desired chalcones 3 (Table 3).
Table 3

Synthesis of chalcones 3 in presence of KF/ABM or NaNO 3 /ABM under microwave irradiation

Entry

 

 Product

 

Yieldsa (%)/Time (min)

 

X

Y

KF/ABM

NaNO3/ABM

1

3a

H

H

88/20

83/20

2

3b

NO2

H

82/20

84/20

3

3c

OCH3

H

82/30

89/20

4

3d

Cl

H

93/20

93/20

5

3g

H

NO2

91/20

96/20

6

3h

OCH3

NO2

85/20

81/20

7

3i

Cl

NO2

94/20

97/20

8

3j

NO2

NO2

91/25

93/20

9

3m

H

OCH3

79/30

82/20

10

3n

NO2

OCH3

84/30

84/30

11

3o

Cl

OCH3

78/30

86/30

12

3q

OCH3

OCH3

72/35

83/35

a Yields refer to isolated compounds.

The reaction proceeded under microwave irradiation in good yields and high purity (Table 4). The reaction time was significantly reduced for each assay and products were obtained after only a few minutes. Electronic effects due to acetophenone and benzaldehyde substitutions persisted.

Compared the two methods the first reaction is performed at atmospheric pressure and the second one under pressure. In general, when the reaction was performed at atmospheric pressure the condensation has allowed the isolation of our products in good yields (Table 1). The reactions are relatively slow. The use of microwave decreases remarkably the reaction time and the attempted products were isolated in good yields after only few minutes (Table 2).

Optimizations for ABMs catalyzed aza-Michael additions

The next step was to use our ABM catalysts for aza-Michael addition using some of the previously synthesized chalcones with amines 4. For this new proposal, the catalyst (ABM, KF/ABM or NaNO3/ABM, 100 mg) was added to an equimolar mixture of aniline, p-methoxyaniline or benzylamine and chalcones (3a-d) in methanol. The mixture was stirred at room temperature until completion of the reaction (TLC). After filtration, the catalyst was washed with dichloromethane and after a simple purification step, the Michael adducts 5 were analyzed by 1 H, 13 C NMR and IR spectrometry. Reaction of 3a with aniline performed in MeOH without ABM was inefficient and the product 5a was not detected.

In the presence of KF or NaNO3 alone, no 1,4-addition occurred, whatever the reaction time tried. In general the use of ABM alone led to the Michael adducts 5 in good (entry 1) to moderate yields (entry 12) and completion was obtained only after 12 h (except for the reaction of 3a with aniline, 6 h).
Table 4

Aza-Michael addition in presence of ABM, KF/ABM or NaNO 3 /ABM

Entry

 

Product

 

Yieldsa (%)/Time (h)

 

N° [ref]

R

X

ABM

KF/ABM

NaNO3/ABM

1

5a[41]

C6H5

H

95/6

96/0.5

93/1

2

5b[42]

C6H5

NO2

86/12

93/1

94/1

3

5c[41]

C6H5

OCH3

75/12

93/3

91/3

4

5d[41]

C6H5

Cl

89/12

90/1

94/1

5

5e[43]

p-CH3OC6H4

H

86/12

97/2

94/1

6

5f[44]

p-CH3OC6H4

NO2

74/12

90/4

93/4

7

5g[42]

p-CH3OC6H4

OCH3

68/12

94/3

93/3

8

5h[45]

p-CH3OC6H4

Cl

78/12

92/3

91/2

9

5i[44]

C6H5CH2

H

59/12

95/12

91/12

10

5j[46]

C6H5CH2

NO2

67/12

92/6

93/6

11

5k[44]

C6H5CH2

OCH3

62/12

91/6

89/6

12

5l[44]

C6H5CH2

Cl

48/12

84/16

81/16

a Yields refer to isolated compounds.

The use of ABM doped with KF or NaNO3 increased the catalytic activity remarkably. The very high yields (84-95% for KF/ABM and 81-94% for NaNO3/ABM could be noted. The rapidity of the reaction (0.5-4 h) using aniline and p-methoxyaniline proved the efficiency of these new catalytic systems. The sole limitations observed concern the use of benzylamine. In this case, the yields are higher but the reaction time increases to 6 h (entries 10, 11) and up to 16 h starting from the chlorochalcone 3d.

Reuse of the doped ABM was investigated and a cycle of five aza-Michael additions was conducted. Each reaction produced the corresponding product 5a in fairly good yield. KF/ABM was collected after each reaction and regenerated by calcination at 400°C for two hours for each new reuse (Table 5). During five cycles the catalyst was near quantitatively recovered but a slight decrease in yield was observed.
Table 5

Studies on the reuse of KF/ABM in the synthesis of product 5a

Entry

Round

Yield (%)

Recovered KF/ABM (%)

1

1

96

99

2

2

92

96

3

3

92

96

4

4

89

90

5

5

81

89

Conclusions

ABM and KF or NaNO3 doped ABMs are efficient catalysts for performing Claisen-Schmidt condensation and aza-Michael additions under mild conditions. MeOH at room temperature and water under microwave irradiation offer two synthetic alternatives. These promising catalysts are very attractive and can be reused several times after simple filtration and calcination.

ABM and its KF or NaNO3 doped analogs are inexpensive and attractive solid supports which can contribute to the development of catalytic processes and reduce environmental problems.

Experimental

General procedure for Claisen-Schmidt condensation: Chalcones 3 were prepared by reacting (2.5 mmol) arylaldehydes 1 and (2.5 mmol) ketones 2 in the presence of methanol (6.5 mL) as the solvent and 100 mg catalyst ABM or 50 mg of doped ABM at room temperature. CH2Cl2 (2 × 20 mL) was added, followed by simple filtration. The solution was concentrated and the crude material was purified by recrystallization.

General procedure for Claisen-Schmidt condensation under microwave irradiation: To a solution of aldehyde 1 (2.5 mmol) and acetophenone 2 (2.5 mmol) in water (300 μL) were added 100 mg of catalyst and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min. The mixture was irradiated by microwave for the appropriate time at 160°C. CH2Cl2 (2 × 20 mL) was added, followed by simple filtration. The solution was concentrated and the crude material was purified by recrystallization.

General procedure for the aza-Michael additions: To a flask containing an equimolar mixture (1.5 mmol) of amine 4 and chalcone derivative 3 in methanol (1.5 mL), 100 mg of catalyst (ABM, KF/ABM or NaNO3/ABM) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature until completion of the reaction (TLC monitoring). The reaction mixture was filtered and the catalyst washed with dichloromethane. After concentration of the filtrate under reduced pressure the residue was subjected to chromatography (n-hexane/EtOAc: 2/1) or recrystallization leading to the Michael adduct 5 as a solid.

1,3-Bis-phenyl-propenone 3a: mp 59-60°C [33]; 1 H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm) 8.12 (2 H, d, J = 8 Hz), 7.63 (1 H, d, J = 16 Hz), 7.45 (1 H, d, J = 16 Hz), 7.46-7.64 (m, 6 H), 7.32 (2 H, t, J = 8.8 Hz) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 Hz): δ (ppm) 191.01, 145.30, 138.58, 135.25, 133.24, 131.00, 129.66, 129.31, 129.06, 128.93, 128.55, 122.44.

1-(4-Nitrophenyl)-3-(4-Chlorophenyl)-propenone 3i: mp 171-172°C [36]; 1 H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm) 8.32 (2 H, d, J = 9.1 Hz), 8.11 (2 H, d, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.74 (1 H, d, J = 15.8 Hz), 7.59 (2 H, d, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.42 (1 H, d, J = 15.8 Hz), 7.36 (2 H, d, J = 8.8 Hz); 13 C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 Hz): δ (ppm) 187.96, 150.64, 148.97, 142.01, 133.79, 133.19, 130.12, 129.84, 124.29, 121.26.

1,3-Bis-(4-nitro-phenyl)-propenone 3j: mp 192-194°C; 1 H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.06-7.81 (m, 8 H), 7.79 (d, 1 H, J = 16 Hz), 7.61 (d, 1 H, J = 16 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 Hz): δ 189.7, 142.0, 139.2, 137.6, 133.3, 132.6, 128.8, 128.7, 128.5, 125.1, 113.5.

1-(4-Nitrophenyl)-3-(4-fluorophenyl)-propenone 3l: mp 178-179°C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.38 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz), 8.31 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz), 8.18 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz), 7.88 (d, 1 H, J = 16 Hz), 7.82 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz), 7.60 (d, 1 H, J = 16 Hz); 13 C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 Hz): δ 188.7, 144.0, 140.7, 131.1, 129.6, 128.3, 120.7, 113.7.

1,3-Bis-(4-methoxyphenyl)-propenone 3q: mp 103-104°C [33]; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm) 8.01 (d, 2 H), 7.77 (d, 1 H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.59 (d, 2 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.41 (d, 1 H, J = 15.5 Hz), 6.95 (d, 2 H, J = 15.5 Hz), 6.90 (d, 2 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 3.83 (s, 3 H), 3.80 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 Hz): δ (ppm) 189.3, 164.4, 161.4, 143.9, 132.3, 131.6, 131.1, 128.7, 114.5, 113.3, 112.7, 55.7, 55.2.

1,3-Diphenyl-3-phenylamino-propan-1-one 5a: mp 170-171°C [42]; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm) 7.92 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz), 7.57 (t, 1 H, J = 8 Hz), 7.45 (t, 2 H, J = 8 Hz), 7.25 (t, 1 H, J = 8 Hz), 7.12–7.01 (m, 5 H), 6.79–6.77 (m, 3 H), 6.67 (t, 1 H, J = 8 Hz), 6.58 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz), 4.98 (dd, 1 H, J = 8; 5 Hz); 4.55 (br s, 1 H); 3.51 (dd, 1 H, J = 16; 5 Hz); 3.43 (dd, 1 H, J = 16; 8 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 Hz): 198.96, 197.80, 146.20, 136.48, 135.00, 133.61, 129.52, 128.79, 128.63, 128.18, 118.76, 114.00, 54.31, 40.92.

3-(4-Methoxy-phenylamino)-1,3-diphenyl-propan-1-one 5e: mp 165-166°C [45]; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm) 7.89 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz); 7.44 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz); 7.32 (t, 2 H, J = 8 Hz); 7.24 (t, 1 H, J = 8 Hz); 7.08 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz); 6.65 (t, 1 H, J = 8 Hz); 6.55 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz); 4.97 (dd, 1 H, J = 8; 4 Hz); 4.61 (br s, 1 H); 3.86 (s, 3 H); 3.45 (dd, 1 H, J = 16; 4 Hz); 3.34 (dd, 1 H, J = 16; 8 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 Hz): δ (ppm) 198.7, 158.5, 148.9, 136.7, 134.89, 133.3, 129.0, 128.6, 128.1, 117.7, 118.2, 114.4, 113.8, 55.2, 54.16, 46.3.

3-Benzylamino-3-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-1-phenyl-propan-1-one 5k: mp 100-101°C [46]; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm) 7.81 (2 H, J = 8 Hz), 7.51–7.12 (12 H, m), 4.5 (dd, 1 H, J = 8 Hz), 3.45-3.55 (m, 2 H), 3.2 (dd, 2 H, J = 16 Hz), 3.3 (s, 3 H), 3.21 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 Hz): 198.9, 144.8, 143.2, 140.4, 133.2, 132.8, 130.5, 129.0, 128.7, 128.6, 128.3, 128.1, 127.3, 127.1, 126.8, 122.1, 58.5, 51.6, 47.3, 46.5.

Methods

Instrumentation and materials. 1H NMR and 13 C NMR were recorded on a Bruker Avance DPX250 spectrometer (400 MHz 1H, 62.89 MHz 13C) using tetramethylsilane as the internal standard, multiplicities were determined by the DEPT 135 equivalence, chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm, δ units). Coupling constants were reported in units of hertz (Hz) if applicable.

Melting points were determined in open capillary tubes and are uncorrected. Flash chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 (40–63 mesh). Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on Merck silica gel 60 F254 precoated plates. Visualization was made with ultraviolet light. Chemicals products were obtained from the following sources: Aldrich and Acros organics.

Microwave (Biotage Initiator 2.5), Biotage microwave vials 2–5 mL.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors thank the "Volubilis" Hubert Curien Program for financial support.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratoire de Biochimie, Environnement & Agroalimentaire, URAC 36, Université Hassan II Mohammedia-Casablanca
(2)
Institut de Chimie Organique & Analytique, UMR CNRS 7311, Université d’Orléans
(3)
Laboratoire de Chimie Organique, Université Ibn Zohr
(4)
Equipe de Chimie Analytique & Environnement, Université Cadi Ayyad

References

  1. Hattori H: Chem Rev. 1995, 95: 527-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ono Y, Baba T: Catal Today. 1997, 38: 321-10.1016/S0920-5861(97)81502-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennazha J, Zahouily M, Sebti S, Boukhari A, Holt EM: Catal Commun. 2001, 2: 101-10.1016/S1566-7367(01)00015-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Riadi Y, Mamouni R, Abrouki Y, El Haddad M, Saffaj N, El Antri S, Routier S, Guillaumet G, Lazar S: Lett Org Chem. 2010, 7: 269-10.2174/157017810791112397.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Riadi Y, Mamouni R, Azzalou R, Boulahjar R, Abrouki Y, El Haddad M, Routier S, Guillaumet G, Lazar S: Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51: 6715-10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.10.056.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Riadi Y, Mamouni R, Azzalou R, Routier S, Guillaumet G, Lazar S: Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52: 3492-10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.04.121.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Dominguez JN, Charris JE, Lobo G, Gamboade Dominguez N, Moreno MM, Riggione F, Sanchez E, Olson J, Rosenthal PJ: Eur J Med Chem. 2001, 36: 555-10.1016/S0223-5234(01)01245-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen M, Christensen SB, Kharazmi A: J Infect Dis. 1997, 176: 1327-10.1086/514129.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hsieh HK, Tsao LT, Lin CN: J Pharm Pharmacol. 2000, 52: 163-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Herencia F, Ferrandiz ML, Alcaraz MJ: FEBS Lett. 1999, 453: 129-10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00707-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen M, Zhai L, Christensen SB, Theander TG, Kharazmi A: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001, 45: 2023-10.1128/AAC.45.7.2023-2029.2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. DeVincenzo R, Ferlini C, Distefano M, Gaggini C, Riva A, Bombardelli E, Morazzoni P, Valenti P, Belluti F, Ranelletti FO: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2000, 46: 305-10.1007/s002800000160.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Varma RS, Kabalka GW, Evans LT, Pagni RM: Synth Commun. 1985, 15: 279-10.1080/00397918508063800.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Sinisterra JV, Garcia-Raso A, Cabello JA, Marinas JM: Synthesis. 1984, 502:Google Scholar
  15. Alcantara AR, Marinas JM, Siniseterra JV: Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28: 1515-10.1016/S0040-4039(01)81030-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Aguilera A, Alcantara AR, Marinas JM, Sinisterra JV: Can J Chem. 1987, 65: 1165-10.1139/v87-195.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sathyanarayana S, Krishnamurty HG: Curr Sci. 1988, 57: 1114-Google Scholar
  18. Guida A, Lhouty MH, Tichit D, Figueras F, Geneste P: Appl. Catal. 1997, 164: 251-10.1016/S0926-860X(97)00175-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Climent MJ, Garcia H, Primo J, Corma A: Catal Lett. 1990, 4: 85-10.1007/BF00764874.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Sebti S, Saber A, Rhihil A, Nazih R, Tahir R: Appl Catal A. 2001, 206: 217-10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00604-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Mogilaiah K, Rao RB: Indian J Chem Sect B. 1999, 38: 869-Google Scholar
  22. Ballini R, Bosica G, Maggi R, Ricciutelli M, Righi P, Sartori G, Sartorio R: Green Chem. 2001, 3: 178-10.1039/b101355f.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Pfau M: Bull Soc Chim Fr. 1967, 117-Google Scholar
  24. Ranu BC, Banerjee S: Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 141-10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.10.142.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cheng MS, Li RS, Kenyon G: Chin Chem Lett. 2000, 11: 851-Google Scholar
  26. Wabnitz TC, Spencer JB: Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43: 3891-10.1016/S0040-4039(02)00654-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Azizi N, Saidi MR: Tetrahedron. 2004, 60: 383-10.1016/j.tet.2003.11.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Furukawa M, Okawara T, Terawaki Y: Chem Pharm Bull. 1977, 25: 1319-10.1248/cpb.25.1319.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Jenner G: Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36: 233-10.1016/0040-4039(94)02215-W.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang L, Xu LW, Zhou W, Li L, Xia CG: Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 7723-10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.08.103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Zahouily M, Bahlaouan B, Rayadh A, Sebti S: Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 4138-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Szell T, Sohar I: Can J Chem. 1969, 47: 1254-10.1139/v69-207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Reddy GV, Maitraie D, Narsaiah B, Rambabu Y, Rao SP: Synth Comm. 2001, 18: 2881-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Kanagarajan V, Thanusu J, Gopalakrishnan M: Eur J Med Chem. 2010, 45: 1583-10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.12.068.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Chtourou M, Abdelhédi R, Frikha MH, Trabelsi M: Ultrason Sonochem. 2010, 17: 246-10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.06.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Wei W, Qunrong W, Liqin D, Aiqing Z, Duoyuan W: Ultrason Sonochem. 2005, 12: 411-10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.12.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Mirjalili BF, Bamoniri A, Zarchi Karimi MA, Emtiazi H: J Iran Chem Soc. 2010, 7: 95-10.1007/BF03245864.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Yulin Z, Yuanjiang P: Chem Lett. 2004, 33: 668-10.1246/cl.2004.668.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Montes-Avila J, Díaz-Camacho SP, Sicairos-Félix J, Delgado-Vargas F, Rivero IA: Bioorg Med Chem. 2009, 17: 6780-10.1016/j.bmc.2009.02.052.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Mariappan G, Chandra DB, Buyan NR, Priya M: J Asian J Chem. 2009, 21: 6827-Google Scholar
  41. Lu GP, Cai C: Catal Commun. 2010, 11: 745-10.1016/j.catcom.2010.02.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Dai Y, Li BD, Quan HD, Lu CX: Chin Chem Lett. 2010, 21: 31-10.1016/j.cclet.2009.08.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Zahouily M, Mounir B, Charki H, Mezdar A, Bahlaouan B, Ouammou M: ARKIVOC. 2006, 178-Google Scholar
  44. Kozlov NG, Basalaeva LI: Russ J Gen Chem. 2004, 74: 926-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Dong F, Zhenghao F, Zuliang L: Catal Commun. 2009, 10: 1267-10.1016/j.catcom.2009.02.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Zahouily M, Charki H, Abrouki Y, Mounir B, Bahlaouan B, Rayadh A, Sebti S: Lett Org Chem. 2005, 2: 354-10.2174/1570178054038830.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Riadi et al.; licensee Chemistry Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.