Skip to main content

Table 2 The calculated coefficients of the prediction models and P-values obtained from the ANOVA test results

From: AQbD TLC-densitometric method approach along with green fingerprint and whiteness assessment for quantifying two combined antihypertensive agents and their impurities

Term

Rf CDS

Rs CTZ & HCZ

Rs HCZ & SMD

Coefficient

p-valuea

Coefficient

p-valuea

Coefficient

p-valuea

I (Intercept)

0.7810

< 0.0001*

1.0807

< 0.0001*

1.0881

< 0.0001*

X (ethyl acetate ratio)

− 0.1943

< 0.0001*

− 0.1306

< 0.0001*

− 0.1609

0.0001*

Y (glacial acetic acid ratio)

− 0.0043

0.7690

− 0.0415

0.0011*

0.0041

0.7996

Z (plate length)

0.0515

0.0128*

− 0.0069

0.3116

0.0836

0.0025*

XY

− 0.0133

0.4196

− 0.0821

< 0.0001*

− 0.0548

0.0214*

XZ

− 0.0429

0.0373*

− 0.0216

0.0255*

− 0.0635

0.0127*

YZ

0.0272

0.1337

− 0.0511

0.0007*

0.0254

0.1903

XYZ

− 0.00004

0.9983

0.0258

0.0150*

0.0406

0.0661

X2

0.0175

0.6105

0.0274

0.1185

− 0.0271

0.4792

Y2

− 0.0724

0.0748

− 0.1273

0.0003*

− 0.0027

0.9430

Z2

− 0.0426

0.2375

0.0093

0.5473

− 0.0097

0.7933

  1. *Values indicate significant effect on the corresponding response
  2. Coefficient (slope); I, intercept; X, ethyl acetate ratio; Y, glacial acetic acid ratio; Z, plate length; Rf, retardation factor; Rs, resolution
  3. aSignificantly different at p ≤ 0.05