Mutagenicity, cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of Ricinus communis different parts

BMC Chemistry

Table 1 Antioxidant profile of extracts of Ricinus communis different parts, extracted by different extraction methods

S. No.	Method	Plants part	TPC (mg/100 g)	TFC (mg/100 g)	DPPH inhibition (%) (0.1 mg/mL)	Linoleic acid inhibition (%)	R. Power (1 mg/mL) (OD)
1	Shaking^C	Seed^b	122 ± 3	15 ± 1	7.25 ± 0.3	43.56 ± 0.3	0.481 ± 0.8
2		Stem^d	24 ± 1	6 ± 0.2	20 ± 0.2	12.46 ± 0.7	0.278 ± 0.3
3		Leave^a	165 ± 1.5	71 ± 1	7.54 ± 0.2	57.38 ± 0.2	0.578 ± 0.6
4		Fruit^c	94 ± 2	68 ± 2	5.14 ± 0.3	35.69 ± 0.4	0.396 ± 0.1
5		Root^e	16 ± 1	4 ± 0.1	6.58 ± 0.8	10.84 ± 0.9	0.209 ± 0.7
6	Sonication^A	Seed^a	361 ± 2	171 ± 2.8	8.8 ± 0.6	87.28 ± 0.1	0.854 ± 0.3
7		Stem^c	11 ± 0.3	4 ± 0.6	6.2 ± 0.9	8.14 ± 0.7	0.184 ± 0.2
8		Leave^b	58 ± 1	32 ± 1.2	10.45 ± 0.7	20.64 ± 0.3	0.356 ± 0.8
9		Fruit^b	64 ± 2	46 ± 1.2	5.67 ± 0.1	23.54 ± 0.6	0.379 ± 0.3
10		Root^c	12 ± 0.5	2.8 ± 0.6	13.29 ± 0.7	11.39 ± 0.2	0.234 ± 0.9
11	Soxhlet^B	Seed^a	149 ± 1.5	94 ± 0.4	7.42 ± 0.5	48.19 ± 0.3	0.523 ± 0.7
12		Stem^c	5 ± 0.1	16 ± 0.1	14.33 ± 0.9	6.63 ± 0.5	0.194 ± 0.4
13		Leave^b	31 ± 1	39 ± 0.6	13.99 ± 0.4	26.32 ± 0.6	0.376 ± 0.6
14		Fruit^b	23 ± 0.5	34 ± 0.3	6.9 ± 0.8	21.21 ± 0.9	0.362 ± 0.2
15		Root^c	9 ± 0.9	2 ± 0.1	8.24 ± 0.6	7.23 ± 0.3	0.231 ± 0.8

The values are the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments. Capital letters in superscripts are representing significant different among extraction methods (P < 0.05) and small letter in superscripts are representing significance difference (P < 0.05) in activity within plant parts for individual extraction methods

ISSN: 2661-801X