Open Access

Synthesis of trace element bearing single crystals of Chlor-Apatite (Ca5(PO4)3Cl) using the flux growth method

  • Stephan Klemme1Email author,
  • Timm John1,
  • Mathias Wessels1,
  • Christof Kusebauch1,
  • Jasper Berndt1,
  • Arno Rohrbach1 and
  • Peter Schmid-Beurmann1
Chemistry Central Journal20137:56

DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-56

Received: 22 January 2013

Accepted: 15 March 2013

Published: 26 March 2013

Abstract

We present a new strategy on how to synthesize trace-element bearing (REE, Sr) chlorapatites Ca5(PO4)3Cl using the flux growth method. Synthetic apatites were up to several mm long, light blue in colour. The apatites were characterized using XRD, electron microprobe and laser ablation ICP-MS (LA-ICPMS) techniques and contained several hundred μg/g La, Ce, Pr, Sm, Gd and Lu and about 1700 μg/g Sr. The analyses indicate that apatites were homogenous (within the uncertainties) for major and trace elements.

Introduction

Apatite (Ca5(PO4)3(Cl,F,OH) is an ubiquitous accessory phase in igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks. Natural apatites contain significant amounts of geologically relevant trace elements such as the rare earth elements (REE), high field strengths elements (HFSE) and large ion lithophile elements (LILE). Moreover, apatite is known to contain high concentrations of U and Th so that apatite formation can be established by conventional radioactive element decay dating or its thermal evolution can be reconstructed by investigating “fission tracks” caused by the decay of radioactive elements [15]. Furthermore, as human and animal bones consist of apatite, U-series dating of relatively young fossils is a new and exciting area of research in quaternary geosciences (e.g. [6]). To aid reliable analysis of trace element concentrations and isotopic ratios, matrix matched reference materials are needed. Single crystal homogeneous apatites that contain known amounts of trace elements would be ideal.

Moreover, apatite weathering and replacement processes in low-grade metamorphic rocks have been in the focus of research recently both in our institution and elsewhere [710]. This is mainly, as apatite, when equilibrated with or growing from a super-critical fluid in low-grade to high-grade metamorphic rocks, may contain a “geochemical fingerprint”, that is a trace element signature from which one might be able to re-construct the composition of the fluid. In order to calibrate such a fingerprint, experiments are needed to investigate the partitioning of trace elements between apatite and fluids in a range of chemical compositions, pressures and temperatures. The experiments in turn need well-characterized starting materials, i.e. trace element bearing homogenous single crystals of apatite.

Furthermore, phosphate ceramics have long been proposed as suitable materials for safe long-term nuclear waste storage [11, 12]. Experiments to simulate interaction of such apatite-based ceramics with water-rich fluids [11, 1315] need suitable actinide-bearing apatite crystals as starting materials [16].

Here we report the high-temperature synthesis of mm-sized single crystal chlorapatites (Ca5(PO4)3Cl) using the so-called flux method. We tried several compositions, temperatures and synthesis routes and here we report on the most successful experiments, both in terms of crystal size as well as in terms of trace element homogeneity.

Previous work

Several studies report the synthesis of single crystal apatite, both fluorapatite, chlorapatite and hydroxyapatite [1723]. Most synthetic apatites contain no trace elements, only a few groups have synthesized apatites with high concentrations (ie. wt.%) of one or two REE [24, 25]. Most synthesis routes involve hydrothermal synthesis at high pressure [26], especially when hydroxyapatite is involved.

Experiments

Initial experiments in chemical compositions without trace elements confirmed the validity of previous experimental results [23]. Using the flux growth method pioneered by Prener and others, we could grow idiomorphic apatite single crystals up to ca. 6 mm in size. All experiments were conducted in Pt-crucibles in conventional vertical high-temperature furnaces at atmospheric pressure. The starting material consisted mainly of various mixtures of Ca3(PO4)2 and CaCl2, the latter of which acted as the flux. The experiments were heated to a temperature above the liquidus, they were held for a short time, and then slowly cooled to a final run temperature. During the cooling apatite crystals formed from the melt. After quenching, the experimental products were washed in water or diluted HCl for several hours. This effectively removes all the CaCl2 flux. Table 1 lists experimental run conditions of each individual experiment. Figure 1 shows some representative single crystal apatites grown in our laboratory.
Table 1

Experimental run conditions

Experiment

ST

RR

PT

H

CR

ET

Trace elements

/

/

/

/

/

/

 

°C

°/h

°C

h

°/h

°C

 

SynCLAP3

800

70

1300

10

6

1100

No

SynCLAP5

800

70

1300

12

6

1025

No

SynCLAP6

800

70

1300

10

6

850

Yes

SynCLAP8

800

70

1420

10

6

800

Yes

SynCLAP9

800

70

1320

10

6

800

Yes

SynCLAP10

800

70

1370

20

6

800

Yes

SynCLAP11

800

70

1370

20

6

800

Yes

SynCLAP12

800

70

1370

20

6

800

Yes

ST: starting temperature, RR: ramp rate during heating to PT, PT: Peak temperature, H: hours at PT, CR: cooling rate down to ET, ET: final run temperature.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-153X-7-56/MediaObjects/13065_2013_Article_581_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Chlorapatite crystals grown with the flux method; crystals from experiment SynCLAP6.

X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD)

For phase characterization an X-ray powder diffraction pattern was recorded using a PHILIPS X´PERT PW 9430 diffractometer with Cu-Kα1 radiation and a primary Ge-(111) monochromator of Johansson Type. The operating conditions were 45 kV and 40 mA. Rietveld refinement was performed using the FULLPROF SUITE 2005 [27]. As starting parameters lattice parameters and crystal structural data including isotropic temperature factors for apatite-(CaCl) were taken from the literature [28]. The parameters which were varied for the refinement included the scale factor, the lattice parameters a and c, 4 background parameters, the sample displacement, two asymmetry parameters as well as the shape parameters w and Y of the Thompson-Cox-Hastings pseudo-Voigt profile function. The refinement converged to an Rwp = 12.4% (Rexp = 9.4%). No significant line broadening could be detected with respect to the Si-640a NIST-Standard which was used to determine the resolution function of the diffractometer. As can be seen from Figure 2 one weak reflection at 25.41°(2θ) remained unexplained which is therefore assumed to belong to an additional unidentified phase. As its intensity is about 0.7% of that of the most intense apatite reflexion we assume that the amount of that phase is about 1% by weight. The results are given in Figure 2 and Table 2 together with recent literature data. In conclusion our apatite sample can be characterised as nearly pure chlor-apatite with very good crystallinity.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-153X-7-56/MediaObjects/13065_2013_Article_581_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

X-ray diffraction: Observed, calculated and difference intensity powder patterns of synthetic chlor-apatite.

Table 2

Unit-cell parameters of synthetic chlorapatites (space group P6/3m )

 

Sample

a[Å]

c[Å]

Chlor-Apatite

   

This work

SynCLAP-3

9.6397(2)

6.7693(1)

García-Tuñón et al. 2012 [28]

Clap

9.6452(2)

6.7636(2)

Luo et al. 2009 [42]

THClAP

9.6330(2)

6.7834(2)

Luo et al. 2009 [42]

UClAP

9.6233(2)

6.7784(3)

Synthesis of trace element bearing apatites

Once we were satisfied which the flux growth itself (SynCLAP3 and SynCLAP5, see Table 1), we conducted further experiments where the starting material contained a number of geochemically relevant trace elements. However, although we added relatively large amounts of trace elements (e.g., SynCLAP 6, 300 μg/g of each trace element, see Table 3) to the initial starting material mixture, we found that the resulting flux-grown apatites did not contain high concentrations of trace elements (generally well below 10 ppm of each trace element). We believe that the overall low concentrations of trace elements in the synthetic apatite crystals was caused by the fact that most of these trace elements, many of which are trivalent rare earth elements, are incorporated into apatites by a coupled substitution which involves incorporation of Na+ which replaces Ca2+ or of Si4+ which replaces P5+ in the apatite structure. Below we show two possible exchange mechanisms for the incorporation of trivalent rare earth elements (REE) into the apatite structure [29, 30].
C a 2 + + P 5 + = RE E 3 + + S i 4 +
(1)
2 C a 2 + = RE E 3 + + N a +
(2)
Table 3

Starting materials

Experiment

Ca3(PO4)2

CaCl2

Trace elements

/

/

 

g

g

 

SynCLAP3

4.65

15.35

None

SynCLAP5

4.65

15.35

None

SynCLAP6

4.65

15.35

300 μg/g of REE, Sr, Y. Th, U, Pb, Ba, Rb, Li, B using the solution K-M1

SynCLAP8

1.16

3.84

3000 μg/g Sm added as Sm2O3, 2 wt.% Si added as SiO2 and 2 wt.% Na added as NaCl

SynCLAP9

1.16

3.84

Identical to SynCLAP8

SynCLAP10

1.16

3.84

3000 μg/g of La, Ce, Pr, Sm, Gd, Lu, Hf, Zr, Ta, Ti, Sc each (added as oxides) and 2 wt.% Si added as SiO2 and 2 wt.% Na added as NaCl

SynCLAP11

1.16

3.84

2000 μg/g of La, Ce, Pr, Sm, Gd, Lu each (added as oxides) and 2 wt.% Si added as SiO2 and 2 wt.% Na added as NaCl

SynCLAP12

1.16

3.84

1500 μg/g of La, Ce, Pr, Sm, Gd, Lu, Sr each (added as oxides) and 0.8 wt.% Si added as SiO2

K-M1: solution containing 1000 μg/g of several REE (La, Ce, Gd, Nd, Sm, Yb, Lu), Sr, Y, Th, U, Pb, Ba, Rb, Li, and B.

We believe that the lack of Na+ and Si4+ in apatites grown in SynCLAP 6 strictly limited the incorporation of trivalent trace elements. Consequently, when we added some Na and Si (2 wt.%, SynCLAP 8, see Table 1 for details) to the starting material, we found that the flux-grown apatites contained significant amounts of Si and also significantly higher amounts of trace elements. This shows that incorporation mechanism (1) is more important than mechanism (2). Experiments SynCLAP 9 and 10 were similar to SynCLAP 8. The latter experiments yielded large and trace element bearing apatite but due to high SiO2 contents of the melt lots of other acicular, needle-like, Ca-silicates formed in the melt. It was difficult to separate apatite crystals from the quench-crystallized matrix after the flux had been washed out. Figure 3 shows typical textures observed in the experiments SynCLAP 8-10.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-153X-7-56/MediaObjects/13065_2013_Article_581_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

SynCLAP10: Ideomorphic apatite crystals (lighter grey) in a matrix of acicular Ca-silicate crystals, most of it wollastonite (CaSiO 3 ), after washing with HCl solutions. The fine intergrowth of apatite with wollastonite needles makes physical recovery of apatite single crystals difficult.

Consequently, SynCLAP 11 and 12 contained less REE and less Na and Si (Table 3). In conclusion, the apatite single crystal synthesis is best-done following procedures and compositions like in experiment SynCLAP 12. The apatite crystals grown in these experiments are large (see Figure 3), they contain high concentrations of trace elements (Table 4) and the apatite crystals can be easily removed from the matrix.
Table 4

Trace element concentrations in Apatites (SynCLAP12)

 

1-1*

1-2

1-3

1-4

1-5

1-6

1-7

1-8

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

 

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

Mg

41

40

43

41

42

43

43

42

Si

10374

10186

10819

10118

9868

10847

10797

10630

Fe

4

4

6

7

8

5

9

4

Sr

1790

1696

1780

1660

1717

1674

1806

1669

La

867

844

887

845

868

1232

908

1085

Ce

16

16

17

16

16

20

17

19

Pr

574

573

598

567

583

823

599

717

Sm

552

552

595

546

556

824

584

722

Gd

548

548

594

537

547

832

584

725

Lu

100

98

108

98

96

125

107

119

 

2-1

2-2

2-3

2-4

2-5

2-6

2-7

2-8

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

 

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

Mg

46

42

41

43

42

41

42

41

Si

10698

10377

10532

10679

10552

10600

11535

10605

Fe

18

3

6

7

7

7

8

9

Sr

1785

1722

1774

1666

1740

1705

1710

1760

La

888

816

853

831

814

844

838

1037

Ce

17

16

17

17

17

17

18

19

Pr

570

540

556

557

551

575

547

711

Sm

589

501

529

522

511

532

527

685

Gd

599

495

523

520

515

534

531

685

Lu

115

94

101

100

96

100

108

113

 

3-1

3-2

3-3

3-4

3-5

3-6

  

/

/

/

/

/

/

  
 

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

μg/g

  

Mg

41

44

44

42

42

39

  

Si

10508

12256

11634

11562

10897

10951

  

Fe

<8.52

9

<8.17

<8.65

11

12

  

Sr

1804

1819

1841

1851

1843

1706

  

La

1008

884

851

869

915

1378

  

Ce

20

21

19

18

19

23

  

Pr

710

616

595

603

640

981

  

Sm

706

598

567

585

623

1041

  

Gd

681

561

533

548

584

985

  

Lu

111

114

104

104

102

134

  

Trace element analyses performed using Laser Ablation ICP-MS. Analytical uncertainties are in the order of 15%. *: The individual analysis numbers (e.g., 1-1 stand for crystal 1 analysis 1) correspond with numbers in white circles (SEM images) in Figure 3.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-153X-7-56/MediaObjects/13065_2013_Article_581_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Synthetic chlorapatite crystals from experiments SynCLAP12. First row: back scattered electron images taken with an analytical scanning electron microscope (SEM). Crystals 1, 2 and 3 were analysed for major elements (Ca, P, Cl, Si) with electron microprobe analyzer (EMPA) and the black lines in the SEM pictures mark the line scans where EMPA Analyses were undertaken. The second row diagrams show the major element composition of the apatite crystals along the line scans. The third row diagrams show trace element concentrations of the apatite crystals which were analysed with Laser Ablation ICP-MS techniques at Münster University. The analyses are numbered (purple circles) and the analysis sites are given in the SEM pics in the first row.

Trace element concentrations in synthetic apatites

When single crystals are grown from a melt (or flux), trace elements will be incorporated into the crystals. The concentration of the trace elements in the crystals depends on their equilibrium partition coefficients (if equilibrium is attained) and the bulk concentration of the trace element. If diffusion rates of trace elements are low in the crystal (and this is the case for all geologically relevant trace elements in apatite [3133], crystals may be zoned, at least in elements which are compatible, that is elements with a crystal/melt partition coefficient >1. This is due to the fact that the first crystals formed will contain comparatively high concentrations of this compatible trace element and the coexisting melt will be consequently depleted in this element. Crystals that form later, or layers of the crystal which form later during cooling will contain significantly lower concentrations of the trace element. As it is well known that many REE, Sr and other important trace elements are compatible in apatite [29, 3437] we were concerned initially that our synthetic apatites may be significantly zoned. However, analytical results using in-house laser ablation ICP-MS techniques [7, 36, 3841] show that the apatites synthesized in SynCLAP12 are rather homogeneous in terms of major and trace elements, surely within the analytical uncertainties. The homogeneity surprised us initially but this is probably due to the fact that the partition coefficients between apatite and CaCl2-rich flux are probably very different from the published apatite/silicate melt partition coefficients (e.g., [29]). Moreover, the flux/crystal ratio employed in our study is high which further minimizes potential zoning during crystal growth. Figure 4 shows major and trace element concentrations of some representative apatite crystals from SynCLAP12.

In summary, we present an effective procedure to synthesize mm-sized single crystals of chlorapatite that contain a variety of geochemically relevant trace elements. These crystals may be used as starting materials for further experiments or used as reference materials for geochemical analysis.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Our thanks go to M. Feldhaus, H. Heying, M. Trogisch, and U. Böcker for their sterling efforts in the Mineralogy workshops at Münster University. We also thank A. Breit for help with the XRD measurements and V. Rapelius with help in the chemical laboratories. The manuscript benefitted from careful and helpful reviews by Dr K-D Grevel and an anonymous reviewer. We acknowledge funding by the DFG (DFG grant No. JO 349/3-1). We further acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Münster.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Westfälische Wilhelms Universität Münster, Institut für Mineralogie

References

  1. Brandon MT, Roden-Tice MK, Garver JI: Late Cenozoic exhumation of the Cascadia accretionary wedge in the Olympic Mountains, northwest Washington State. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1998, 110: 985-1009. 10.1130/0016-7606(1998)110<0985:LCEOTC>2.3.CO;2.View Article
  2. Gallagher K, Brown R, Johnson C: Fission track analysis and its applications to geological problems. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 1998, 26: 519-572. 10.1146/annurev.earth.26.1.519.View Article
  3. Hasebe N, Barbarand J, Jarvis K, Carter A, Hurford AJ: Apatite fission-track chronometry using laser ablation ICP-MS. Chem Geol. 2004, 207: 135-145. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.01.007.View Article
  4. Soderlund U, Patchett JP, Vervoort JD, Isachsen CE: The Lu-176 decay constant determined by Lu-Hf and U-Pb isotope systematics of Precambrian mafic intrusions. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2004, 219: 311-324. 10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00012-3.View Article
  5. Wagner GA: Fission track dating of apatites. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 1968, 4: 411-415. 10.1016/0012-821X(68)90072-1.View Article
  6. Eggins S, Grun R, Pike AWG, Shelley M, Taylor L: U-238, Th-232 profiling and U-series isotope analysis of fossil teeth by laser ablation-ICPMS. Quat Sci Rev. 2003, 22: 1373-1382. 10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00064-7.View Article
  7. Engvik AK, Golla-Schindler U, Berndt J, Austrheim H, Putnis A: Intragranular replacement of chlorapatite by hydroxy-fluor-apatite during metasomatism. Lithos. 2009, 112: 236-246.View Article
  8. Putnis A: Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Water-Rock Interaction. Edited by: Oelkers EH, Schott J. 2009, 70: 87-124. Mineral Replacement Reactions, Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry
  9. Rendon-Angeles JC, Yanagisawa K, Ishizawa N, Oishi S: Effect of metal ions of chlorapatites on the topotaxial replacement by hydroxyapatite under hydrothermal conditions. J Solid State Chem. 2000, 154: 569-578. 10.1006/jssc.2000.8888.View Article
  10. Yanagisawa K, Rendon-Angeles JC, Ishizawa N, Oishi S: Topotaxial replacement of chlorapatite by hydroxyapatite during hydrothermal ion exchange. Am Mineral. 1999, 84: 1861-1869.
  11. Oelkers EH, Montel JM: Phosphates and nuclear waste storage. Elements. 2008, 4: 113-116. 10.2113/GSELEMENTS.4.2.113.View Article
  12. Weber WJ, Roberts FP: A review of radiation effects in solid nuclear waste forms. Nucl Technol. 1983, 60: 178-198.
  13. de Kerdaniel ED, Clavier N, Dacheux N, Terra O, Podor R: Actinide solubility-controlling phases during the dissolution of phosphate ceramics. J Nucl Mater. 2007, 362: 451-458. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.132.View Article
  14. Terra O, Dacheux N, Audubert F, Podor R: Immobilization of tetravalent actinides in phosphate ceramics. J Nucl Mater. 2006, 352: 224-232. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.058.View Article
  15. Vance ER, Ball CJ, Begg BD, Carter ML, Day RA, Thorogood GJ: Pu, U, and Hf incorporation in Gd silicate apatite. J Am Ceram Soc. 2003, 86: 1223-1225. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03455.x.View Article
  16. Frei D, Harlov D, Dulski P, Ronsbo J: Apatite from Durango (Mexico) - A potential standard for in situ trace element analysis of phosphates. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2005, 69: A794-A794.
  17. Baumer A, Argiolas R: Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization by X-ray of chlor, fluor or hydroxyapatite crystals. N Jahrb Mineralogie-Monatsh. 1981, 8: 344-348.
  18. Garcia-Tunon E, Couceiro R, Franco J, Saiz E, Guitian F: Synthesis and characterisation of large chlorapatite single-crystals with controlled morphology and surface roughness. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012, 23: 2471-2482. 10.1007/s10856-012-4717-0.View Article
  19. Koutsopoulos S: Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite crystals: A review study on the analytical methods. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002, 62: 600-612. 10.1002/jbm.10280.View Article
  20. Oishi S, Kamiya T: Flux growth of fluorapatite crystals. Nippon Kagaku Kaishi. 1994, 9: 800-804.View Article
  21. Oishi S, Sugiura I: Growth of chlorapatite crystals from a sodium chloride flux. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1997, 70: 2483-2487. 10.1246/bcsj.70.2483.View Article
  22. Perloff A, Posner AS: Preparation of pure hydroxyapatite crystals. Science. 1956, 124: 583-584.View Article
  23. Prener JS: Growth and crystallographic properties of calcium fluor- and chlorapatite crystals. J Electrochem Soc. 1967, 114: 77-83. 10.1149/1.2426512.View Article
  24. Fleet ME, Pan YM: Site preference of rare-earth elements in fluorapatite. Am Mineral. 1995, 80: 329-335.
  25. Mitchell RH, Xiong J, Mariano AN, Fleet ME: Rare-earth-element-activated cathodoluminescence in apatite. Can Mineral. 1997, 35: 979-998.
  26. Hughes JM, Rakovan J: Phosphates: Geochemical, Geobiological, and Materials Importance. Edited by: Kohn MJ, Rakovan J, Hughes JM. 2002, 48: 1-12. The crystal structure of apatite, Ca-5(PO4)(3)(F,OH,Cl), Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry
  27. Rodriguez-Carvajal J: Full Prof Suite 2005, Lab. de Léon Brillouin (CEA-CNRS). 2005, France: CEA/Saclay
  28. García-Tuñón E, Dacuña B, Zaragoza G, Franco J, Guitián F: OH ion-exchanging process in chlorapatite Ca5(PO4)3Clx (OH)1-x – a deep insight. Acta Crystallogr Sect B Struct Crystallogr Cryst Chem. 2012, 68: 467-479. 10.1107/S0108768112019520.View Article
  29. Prowatke S, Klemme S: Trace element partitioning between apatite and silicate melts. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2006, 70: 4513-4527. 10.1016/j.gca.2006.06.162.View Article
  30. Ronsbo JG: Coupled substitutions involving REE and Na and Si in apatites in alkaline rocks from the Ilimaussaq intrusion, South-Greenland, and the petrological implications. Am Mineral. 1989, 74: 896-901.
  31. Cherniak DJ: Rare earth element diffusion in apatite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2000, 64: 3871-3885. 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00467-1.View Article
  32. Cherniak DJ: Uranium and manganese diffusion in apatite. Chem Geol. 2005, 219: 297-308. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.02.014.View Article
  33. Cherniak DJ, Lanford WA, Ryerson FJ: Lead diffusion in apatite and zircon using ion-implantation and rutherford backscattering techniques. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1991, 55: 1663-1673. 10.1016/0016-7037(91)90137-T.View Article
  34. Chazot G, Menzies MA, Harte B: Determination of partition coefficients between apatite, clinopyroxene, amphibole, and melt in natural spinel lherzolites from Yemen: Implications for wet melting of the lithospheric mantle. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1996, 60: 423-437. 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00412-2.View Article
  35. Fujimaki H: Partition-coefficients of Hf, Zr, and REE between zircon, apatite, and liquid. Contrib Mineral Petrol. 1986, 94: 42-45. 10.1007/BF00371224.View Article
  36. Klemme S, Dalpe C: Trace-element partitioning between apatite and carbonatite melt. Am Mineral. 2003, 88: 639-646.View Article
  37. Watson EB, Green TH: Apatite liquid partition-coefficients for the rare-earth elements and strontium. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 1981, 56: 405-421.View Article
  38. Heinrich CA, Pettke T, Halter WE, Aigner-Torres M, Audetat A, Gunther D, Hattendorf B, Bleiner D, Guillong M, Horn I: Quantitative multi-element analysis of minerals, fluid and melt inclusions by laser-ablation inductively-coupled-plasma mass-spectrometry. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2003, 67: 3473-3497. 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00084-X.View Article
  39. Longerich HP, Jackson SE, Gunther D: Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometric transient signal data acquisition and analyte concentration calculation. J Anal Atom Spectrom. 1996, 11: 899-904. 10.1039/ja9961100899.View Article
  40. Klemme S, Meyer HP: Trace element partitioning between baddeleyite and carbonatite melt at high pressures and high temperatures. Chem Geol. 2003, 199: 233-242. 10.1016/S0009-2541(03)00081-0.View Article
  41. Beyer C, Klemme S, Wiedenbeck M, Stracke A, Vollmer C: Fluorine in nominally fluorine-free mantle minerals: Experimental partitioning of F between olivine, orthopyroxene and silicate melts with implications for magmatic processes. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2013, 337: 1-9.
  42. Luo Y, Hughes JM, Rakovan J, Pan Y: Site preference of U and Th in Cl, F, and Sr apatites. Am Mineral. 2009, 94: 345-351. 10.2138/am.2009.3026.View Article

Copyright

© Klemme et al.; licensee Chemistry Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.