Skip to main content

Table 3 Recoveries of the described method for RA in different parts of P. frutescens

From: Determination of the content of rosmarinic acid by HPLC and analytical comparison of volatile constituents by GC-MS in different parts of Perilla frutescens (L.) Britt

Sample

Trial

Sample weigh (g)

Spiked amount (mg)

Cal. conc (mg/L)

Cal. total amount (mg)

Amount in sample (mg)

Cal. spiked amount (mg)

Recovery (%)

Perillae Caulis (PCa-01)

1

0.5038

0.1672

12.7781

0.3195

0.1660

0.1535

91.79

2

0.5019

0.1672

12.7081

0.3177

0.1653

0.1524

91.12

3

0.5014

0.1672

12.7228

0.3181

0.1652

0.1529

91.44

Mean

91.45

SD

0.34

RSD (%)

0.37

Perillae Folium (PFo-01)

1

0.5023

0.4703

37.0332

0.9258

0.4600

0.4658

99.05

2

0.5026

0.4703

37.2100

0.9302

0.4603

0.4700

99.93

3

0.5027

0.4703

37.3131

0.9328

0.4604

0.4725

100.46

Mean

99.81

SD

0.71

RSD (%)

0.71

Perillae Fructus (PFr-01)

1

0.5043

1.0090

83.4811

2.0870

1.1388

0.9482

93.98

2

0.5021

1.0090

83.7794

2.0945

1.1338

0.9607

95.21

3

0.5043

1.0090

84.9101

2.1228

1.1388

0.9840

97.52

Mean

95.57

SD

1.80

 

RSD (%)

1.88