Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research Article
  • Open Access

Tissue-specific chemical profiling and quantitative analysis of bioactive components of Cinnamomum cassia by combining laser-microdissection with UPLC-Q/TOF–MS

Chemistry Central Journal201812:71

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-018-0438-x

Received: 21 June 2017

Accepted: 5 June 2018

Published: 21 June 2018

Abstract

Background

Cinnamomi Cortex, the dried stem bark of Cinnamomum cassia Presl (Rougui in Chinese) has been widely used in traditional Chinese medicine, cooking and perfumery for thousands of years. Traditionally, the Cinnamomi Cortex of thick size is considered to be of good quality; however, there is no scientific data to support this point. Considering that essential oils are the main bioactive components, Cinnamomi Cortex of greater variety and amount essential oils is thought to be of better quality. In this study, laser microdissection coupled with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole/time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q/TOF–MS) was applied to profile the essential oils in different tissues of Cinnamomi Cortex and to determine if there is a correlation between the essential oil content and the stem bark thickness.

Results

We report the tissue-specific metabolic profiles of different grades of Cinnamomi Cortex. Nineteen chemical components were unequivocally or tentatively identified in the chromatogram of the test samples. The results indicate that the bioactive components, the essential oils, were mainly present in the phloem.

Conclusion

Phloem thickness is the key character for evaluating the quality of Cinnamomi Cortex. Our results can be of great importance in improving the cultivation, harvesting, and processing of Cinnamomi Cortex, as well as enhancing its effects in clinical applications.

Keywords

Essential oils Cinnamomum cassia PreslLMDUPLC-Q/TOF–MS

Background

Cinnamomi Cortex, is the dried stem bark of Cinnamomum cassia Presl, known as Rougui in Chinese. It has been widely cultivated in Southeast Asia and is commonly used in pharmaceuticals, cooking and cosmetics. Essential oils have been proven to be the main active components of Cinnamomi Cortex [1], with cinnamaldehyde making up between 17.1 and 87.23% of these oils [2]. Coumarin, cinnamyl alcohol, cinnamic acid and 2-methoxycinnamaldehyde also comprise significant proportions of the essential oils [3]. Previous pharmacological studies have demonstrated that the essential oils of Cinnamomi Cortex have antioxidant, antidiabetic, anti-platelet aggregation and antifungal activities [47]. Thus, in this study, five compounds, namely coumarin, cinnamyl alcohol, cinnamic acid, cinnamaldehyde and 2-methoxycinnamaldehyde, were selected as chemical markers for determination.

Currently various specifications of different grades of Cinnamomi Cortex have been found in the herbal market, such as Zhong tong (cylindric as sample RGgxdxzt), Ban gui (plate-like as sample RGgxpnbg), and Guan gui (scroll-like or groove shape as sample RGgxpngg). In clinical applications, they are typically used without discrimination, but is there a clinical difference? Comparing the chemical composition of different grades will enable us to determine the difference between grades and will help us evaluate whether these differences are significant in terms of applications. Modern laboratory studies have focused on HPLC-based fingerprint chromatography and determination of characteristic components [810]. However, evaluating the quality of Cinnamomi Cortex by modern instruments is time-consuming and inconvenient. Traditionally, the Cinnamomi Cortex of thick size is thought to be of good quality; but there is no scientific evidence to support this point. In the present study, various samples of Cinnamomi Cortex of different grades were collected for tissue-specific chemical analysis combining laser micro-dissected system (LMD) with ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q/TOF–MS). Through this study, the relationship between microscopic features and active components can be established; this relationship will enable people to evaluate pharmaceutical quality of Cinnamomi Cortex by appearance. The research also provides helpful information that can guide the cultivating, collecting and processing of Cinnamomi Cortex for maximum quality in applications.

Experiment section

Plant materials

The plant materials were collected from six major cultivation areas. Table 1 shows the details including sources and morphological descriptions for each sample. Figure 1 shows the characteristic appearance of a sample. All the plant materials were identified by Prof. Zhongzhen Zhao, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University. The voucher specimens are deposited in the Bank of China (Hong Kong) Chinese Medicines Centre of Hong Kong Baptist University.
Table 1

Sample information of Cinnamomum cassia materials

Sample no.

Locality

Grade

Morphological description

Mean thickness (mm)

Proportions of each tissue (%)

Surface

Cross-section

CK

C

PE

PH

RGyueaj

Wen’an, Vietnam

Grade A

Externally greyish-white, slightly rough, showing greyish-green streak, internally reddish-brown

Pericycle banded

3.7

6

13

5

76

RGyuebj

Wen’an, Vietnam

Grade B

Both externally and internally reddish-brown, slightly even

Pericycle banded

3.0

20

14

66

RGyuecj

Wen’an, Vietnam

Grade C

Externally greyish-brown, slightly rough, showing greyish-white streak, internally reddish-brown

Pericycle banded

3.1

6

17

11

66

RGgxdxjcy

Guangxi, China

Not specific

Externally greyish-brown, slightly rough, internally pale brown

Pericycle banded

3.1

7

24

28

41

RGgxpnjcy

Guangxi, China

Not specific

Externally brown, slightly rough, internally brownish-red

Pericycle banded

2.4

4

20

11

65

RGgddqjcy

Guangdong, China

Not specific

Externally greyish-brown, relatively rough, internally pale brownish

Pericycle banded

4.1

5

27

28

40

RGgxdxzt

Guangxi, China

Zhong tong

Externally greyish-brown, slightly rough, internally dark brown

Pericycle banded

3.7

4

29

25

42

RGgxpnzt

Guangxi, China

Zhong tong

Externally pale brown, slightly rough, internally dark brown

Pericycle scattered

5.9

5

32

38

25

RGgddqzt

Guangdong, China

Zhong tong

Externally greyish-brown, slightly rough, internally brownish-red

Pericycle scattered

4.7

10

17

24

49

RGyunaj

Yunnan, China

Grade A

Externally greyish-brown, relatively rough, showing greyish-white or greyish-green streak, internally reddish-brown

Pericycle banded

4.1

7

16

10

67

RGyunbj

Yunnan, China

Grade B

Externally greyish-brown, relatively rough, showing greyish-white or greyish-green streak, internally reddish-brown

Pericycle banded

4.3

2

21

38

39

RGyuncj

Yunnan, China

Grade C

Externally greyish-brown, relatively rough, showing greyish-white or greyish-green streak, internally reddish-brown

Pericycle scattered

3.8

5

24

26

45

RGgxpnbg

Guangxi, China

Ban gui

Externally dark brown, slightly rough, internally brownish-red

Pericycle banded

6.0

6

31

21

42

RGgxdxbg

Guangxi, China

Ban gui

Externally greyish-brown, slightly rough, internally dark brownish-red

Pericycle scattered

2.4

5

31

29

35

RGlw

Laos

Not specific

Externally greyish-brown, slightly rough, internally dark brown

Pericycle banded

3.0

6

27

34

33

RGgxpngg

Guangxi, China

Guan gui

Externally dark brown, slightly rough, internally pale brown

Pericycle banded

3.6

4

55

16

25

Figure 1
Fig. 1

The characteristic appearance of cinnamon materials

Chemicals and reagents

Chemical standards including coumarin, cinnamyl alcohol, cinnamic acid, cinnamaldehyde and 2-methoxycinnamaldehyde were purchased from Shanghai Tauto Biotech Company (Shanghai, China). The purity of each standard was over 98%. Acetonitrile and methanol of HPLC grade were from E. Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), and formic acid of HPLC grade was from Tedia (Fairfield, USA). Water was purified using a Milli-Q water system (Millipore; Bedford, MA, USA).

Materials and instruments

Leica Laser microdissection 7000 system (Leica, Benshein, Germany), Agilent 6540 ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time of flight spectrometer equipped with a mass hunter workstation software (Agilent version B.06.00 series, Agilent Technologies, USA), Cryotome (Thermo Shandon As620 Cryotome, Cheshire, UK), Ultrasonic instrument (CREST 1875HTAG Ultrasonic Processor, CREST, Trenton, NJ), Centrifuge (Centrifuge 5417R, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), Electronic balance (Mettler Toledo MT5 style), Nonfluorescent polyethylene terephthalate (PET) microscope steel frame slide (76 × 26 mm, 1.4 μm, Leica Microsystems, Bensheim, Germany), Centrifuge tube (500 μL, 1.5 mL, Leica), HPLC grade vial (1.5 mL, Grace, Hong Kong), glass insert with plastic bottom spring (400 μL, Grace, Hong Kong), Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, USA), C18 pre-column (2.1 × 5 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, USA).

Sample solution preparations

The dried medicinal materials were firstly softened by infiltrating with water-soaked paper. The softened Cinnamomi Cortex was cut into small sections, fixed by cryogen, and then frozen on a − 20 °C cryobar. Serial slices of 40 μm in thickness were cut at − 10 °C. Each cross-section of tissue was mounted directly to a non-fluorescent polyethylene terephthalate. The slide was exposed under a Leica LMD 7000 microscopic system. Microdissection was conducted by a DPSS laser beam at 349 nm wavelength, aperture of 30, speed of 3, power of 50 μJ and pulse frequency of 1695 Hz under a Leica LMD system at 6.3 × magnification. Four different target tissues, approximately 1 × 106 μm2 per each, were individually separated. The microdissected tissues fell into caps of 500 μL micro centrifuge tubes by gravity. Lastly, the separated tissue part in each cap was transferred to the bottom of the tube by centrifuging for 10 min (12,000 rpm, 17 °C). 100 μL methanol was added into each micro centrifuge tube. The tube was sonicated for 60 min and then centrifuged again for 10 min (12,000 rpm, 17 °C). 90 μL of the supernatant was transferred into a glass insert with plastic bottom spring in a 1.5 mL brown HPLC grade vial and stored at 4 °C before analysis.

Standard solution preparation

Each standard compound was accurately weighed by an analytical balance and dissolved in methanol to produce mixed stock solution with concentrations at 103.05 μg/mL of coumarin, 12.32 μg/mL of cinnamyl alcohol, 132.7 μg/mL of cinnamic acid, 106.94 μg/mL of cinnamaldehyde, 157.6 μg/mL of 2-methoxycinnamaldehyde. A series of mixed standard solutions was prepared by dilution with methanol.

Method of UPLC-Q/TOF–MS

The UPLC-Q/TOF–MS analysis was conducted at room temperature (20 °C). The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid–water (A) and 0.1% formic acid-acetonitrile (B). The gradient program was optimized as follows: 0–8 min, 5–35%B; 8–21 min, 35–65%B; 21–27 min, 65–100%B; 27–31 min, 100%B; 31–31.1 min, 100–5%B; 31.1–35 min, 5%B. The injection volume was 3 μL for each sample. The flow rate was set at 0.4 mL/min. The mass spectra was acquired in positive mode with mass to charge ratio (m/z) ranging from 100 to 1700. The operation parameters of the mass spectrometer were set as follows: dry gas temperature, 300 °C; dry gas (N2) flow rate, 8.0 L/min; nebulizer pressure, 40 psi; capillary voltage, 3500 V; nozzle voltage, 500 V; and fragmentor voltage, 120 V. The energies for collision-induced dissociation (CID) for fragmentation were set at 20 and 35 eV.

Method validation

Linearity, limits of detection (LODs), limits of quantification (LOQs), repeatability, stability, intra-day precision and inter-day precision were assessed. A series of diluted mixed standard solutions was analyzed subsequently from low to high concentration for linearity, LODs and LOQs. The phloem of RGyueaj was selected for validating the method’s repeatability and stability. Repeatability was evaluated by six replicated analyses of the phloem at the similar locations in six tissue slices. Stability was tested on one sample solution at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48 h. Intra-day precision was performed by analyzing five replications of the mixed standard solution in 1 day while inter-day precision was examined by analyzing three replications of the solution in three consecutive days.

Results and discussion

Microscopic examination and dissection by LMD

As shown under the normal light and fluorescence mode (Fig. 2), the transverse section of Cinnamomi Cortex could be divided into four portions: cork (CK), cortex (C), pericycle (PE) and phloem (PH). Cork consists of several layers of cells and emits bluish-grey fluorescence. Cortex has a scattering of stone cells. Dark brown fluorescence was emitted from cortex to phloem, while a bright blue color was emitted from the pericycle. Pericycle was arranged in an interrupted ring. Phloem was broad with rays 1–2 rows of cells wide. Since different tissues possessed various features and could be distinguished under fluorescence mode, each separated tissue was dissected at the size of about 1,000,000 μm2 by LMD.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Microscopic characteristics of the Cinnamomum cassia (RGyueaj). a Observed under the light microscopy. b Observed under the fluorescent microscopy

Tissue-specific chemical profiling

Tissue-specific chemical profiles were obtained as base peak chromatograms by UPLC-Q/TOF–MS (representative chromatograms are showed in Fig. 3). A total of 19 peaks were unequivocally or tentatively identified in the chromatogram of the medicinal material sample RGyuncj by comparing their retention times, m/z of molecular ions and/or fragment ions with standards or reported references [2, 1116]. Five peaks were positively identified. Peaks 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16 were unambiguously identified as coumarin (147.0438 m/z, [M + H]+), cinnamic acid (149.0595 m/z, [M + H]+), cinnamaldehyde (133.0647 m/z, [M + H]+), cinnamyl alcohol (135.0802 m/z, [M + H]+) and 2-methoxycinnamaldehyde (163.0750 m/z, [M + H]+), respectively. 13 peaks were tentatively identified by comparison of their molecular ions of [M + H]+ or [M + Na]+ from literature reports. The detailed results are shown in Table 2.
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Representative UPLC-Q/TOF–MS base peak chromatograms of medicinal material sample and various tissues from Cinnamomum cassia

Table 2

Chemical characterization of medicinal material sample of RGyuncj by UPLC-Q/TOF–MS

Peak no.

Identification

tR (min)

Molecular formular

Measured mass (m/z)

Theoretical mass (m/z)

Mass accuracy (ppm)

Ion type

MS/MS (m/z)

1

Fructosea

0.71

C6H12O6

203.0522

203.0532

 − 4.92

[M + Na]+

185[M+Na-H2O]+, 157[M+Na-CH2O2]+, 136[M+H-CHO2]+

2

Sucrosea

0.71

C12H22O11

365.1048

365.1060

 − 3.29

[M + Na]+

351[M+Na-CH2]+, 203[M+Na-C6H10O5]+

3

(+)-Catechina

3.33

C15H14O6

291.0856

291.0863

 − 2.40

[M + H]+

185[M+H-C3H6O4]+, 123[M+H-C12H8O]+

4

Procyanidin B1 or B2a

3.34

C30H26O12

579.1484

579.1497

 − 2.24

[M + H]+

409[M+H-C8H10O4]+, 309[M+H-C9H18O9]+, 123[M+H-C27H19O7]+

5

B-type procyanidin trimera

3.92

C45H38O18

867.2116

867.2131

 − 1.73

[M + H]+

579[M+H-C13H20O7]+, 439[M+H-C16H28O13]+, 377[M+H-C17H30O16]+, 344[M+H-C18H35O17]+, 123[M+H-C42H31O13]+

6

Procyanidin B1 or B2a

3.92

C30H26O12

579.1487

579.1497

 − 1.73

[M + H]+

439[M+H-C7H8O3]+, 344[M+H-C7H13O8]+, 289[M+H-C12H18O8]+

123[M+H-C27H19O7]+

7

B-type procyanidin tetramera

4.10

C60H50O24

1155.2741

1155.2765

 − 2.08

[M + H]+

867[M+H-C8H18O9]+, 579[M+H-C22H40O17]+, 483[M+H-C45H20O7]+, 351[M+H-C46H28O14]+, 171[M+H-C52H40O20]+

8

Cinnzeylanola

4.67

C20H32O7

407.2037

407.2046

 − 2.21

[M + Na]+

349[M+H-C2H2O2]+, 331[M+H-C6H4]+, 123[M+H-C17H25O2]+

9

Cinnacasside Ea

5.20

C25H38O11

537.2297

537.2312

 − 2.79

[M + Na]+

303[M+H-C9H14O7]+, 123[M+H-C22H31O6]+

10

Guiacola

6.23

C7H8O2

147.0438

147.0422

10.88

[M + Na]+

118[M+Na-CHO]+, 103[M+Na-C2H4O]+

11

Coumarinb

6.23

C9H6O2

147.0438

147.0440

 − 1.36

[M + H]+

103[M+H–CO2]+, 91[M+H-C3H4O]+, 77[M+H-C3H2O2]+

65[M+H-C4H2O2]+

12

2-Hydroxycinnamaldehydea

6.40

C9H8O2

149.0592

149.0597

 − 3.35

[M + H]+

131[M+H-H2O]+, 121[M+H-CO]+, 103[M+H-CH2O2]+

93[M+H-C3H4O]+, 91[M+H-C2H2O2]+, 77[M+H-C3H4O2]+

65[M+H-C4H4O2]+, 55[M+H-C5H2O2]+

13

Cinnamic acidb

7.79

C9H8O2

149.0595

149.0597

 − 1.34

[M + H]+

131[M+H-H2O]+, 123[M+H-C2H2]+, 103[M+H-CH2O2]+

14

(E)-Cinnamaldehydeb

8.28

C9H8O

133.0647

133.0648

 − 0.75

[M + H]+

115[M+H-H2O]+, 105[M+H-CO]+, 103[M+H-CH2O]+

91[M+H-C2H2O]+, 79[M+H-C3H2O]+, 77[M+H-C3H4O]+

55[M+H-C6H6]+

15

Cinnamyl alcoholb

9.39

C9H10O

135.0802

135.0804

 − 1.48

[M + H]+

117[M+H-H2O]+, 91[M+H-C2H4O]+, 55[M+H-C6H8]+

16

2-Methoxycinnamaldehydeb

9.39

C10H10O2

163.0750

163.0754

 − 2.45

[M + H]+

145[M+H-H2O]+, 135[M+H-CO]+, 115[M+H-CH5O2]+

107[M+H-C3H4O]+, 105[M+H-C2H2O2]+, 91[M+H-C3H4O2]+

79[M+H-C4H4O2]+, 77[M+H-C4H6O2]+, 57[M+H-C7H6O]+

55[M+H-C7H8O]+

17

Unknown

13.00

C15H24O2

237.1829

237.1849

 − 8.43

[M + H]+

71[M+H-C10H13O2]+, 81[M+H-C11H8O]+, 89[M+H-C10H12O]+

93[M+H-C10H8O]+, 105[M+H-C9H8O]+, 149[M + H-C4H8O2]+

219[M+H-H2O]+

18

Dehydro-sesquiterpene oxidea

16.56

C15H22O

219.1741

219.1743

 − 0.91

[M + H]+

150[M+H-C4H5O]+, 135[M+H-C5H8O]+, 121[M+H-C6H10O]+

19

Dehydro-sesquiterpenea

18.54

C15H22

203.1791

203.1794

 − 1.48

[M + H]+

185[M+Na-C3H5]+, 150[M+H-C4H5]+, 136[M+H-C5H7]+

123[M+H-C6H8]+, 103[M+H-C7H16]+

aIdentified by previous literature reports

bIdentified by standards

As seen from Table 3, peak 10 couldn’t be detected in any tissue of any sample. It can be assumed that the content of peak 10 is below LOD in herbal tissues. The totality of chemicals in cortex (5–12 peaks) and phloem (5–10 peaks) was slightly greater than those in cork (4–8 peaks) and pericycle (5–8 peaks). Peaks 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, namely coumarin, cinnamic acid, cinnamaldehyde, cinnamyl alcohol and 2-methoxycinnamaldehyde, could be detected in almost every tissue. Distinctly, the areas of these peaks were larger than those of other chemicals. Therefore, further quantitative analysis of them was carried out.
Table 3

The chromatographic peaks found in the chromatograms of each tissue in different specifications of cinnamon

Sample no.

Tissues/peak no. (T: totality)

CK

T

C

T

PE

T

PH

T

RGyueaj

1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

8

1, 2, 5, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19

11

1, 2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

7

1, 2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

7

RGyuebj

1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

8

1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16

10

1, 2, 4, 11, 14, 16

6

1, 2, 4, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

9

RGyuecj

1, 2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

7

1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

11

1, 2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

7

1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

8

RGgxdxjcy

8, 11, 14, 16

4

2, 4, 8, 11, 13, 14

6

2, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

8

2, 8, 11, 13, 14, 16

6

RGgxpnjcy

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

RGgddqjcy

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

RGgxdxzt

2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

9

2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

RGgxpnzt

2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

10

2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

RGgddqzt

1, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

10

1, 2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

7

1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

10

RGyunaj

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

9

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

RGyunbj

1, 4, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

1, 4, 5, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

8

1, 2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

7

1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

8

RGyuncj

1, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

12

1, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

7

1, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18

8

RGgxpnbg

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

RGgxdxbg

11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

RGlw

2, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

8

2, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

9

2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

7

1, 2, 8, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

8

RGgxpngg

11, 13, 14, 15, 16

5

2, 4, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

7

2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

2, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16

6

Quantification of essential oils in various tissues

The results of method validation are presented in Table 4. The regression equation for each compound was calculated in the form of y = ax + b, where y and x were peak area and amount of compound injected, respectively. Each calibration curve possessed good linearity with correlation coefficients (r2) ≥ 0.9953 within the selected range. The LODs and LOQs were determined at signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios of 3 and 10, respectively. The repeatability ranged from 5.34 to 27.56%. The RSD value of stability was less than 11.66%, indicating that the stability of current method in this study was acceptable. The above assay results indicate that this developed method is reproducible, precise and sensitive enough for tissue-specific determination of five analytes in Cinnamomi Cortex.
Table 4

Method validation results

Analyte

Calibration curve

Linear range (ng/mL)

r2

LODs (ng/mL)

LOQs (ng/mL)

Repeatability

(n = 6, RSD, %)

Stability (n = 5, RSD, %)

Precision RSD (%)

Intra-day (n = 5)

Inter-day (n = 3)

Coumarin

y = 905852x − 26008

51.525–1030.5

0.9981

19.1

56.1

17.43

5.99

3.17

2.81

Cinnamyl alcohol

y = 1486.4x − 350.23

267.6–11339

0.9970

29.0

147.3

27.56

2.03

6.13

32.66

Cinnamic acid

y = 66690x − 2038

66.35–1327

0.9982

159.3

334.2

5.34

7.34

4.31

5.27

Cinnamaldehyde

y = 539.3x + 833.7

2615.6–111058

0.9996

513.2

1053.0

10.37

3.40

2.45

30.50

2-Methoxycinnamaldehyde

y = 1*106x − 5380.3

39.4–394

0.9953

9.3

52.7

9.26

11.66

23.97

28.40

The results of quantitative analysis (Additional file 1: Table S1 and Fig. 4) demonstrated that the content of cinnamaldehyde was much higher than other chemicals. Cinnamaldehyde was concentrated in phloem except for sample RGlw, where it was most abundant in the pericycle. 2-methoxycinnamaldehyde showed the same pattern of occurrence as cinnamaldehyde. Cinnamic acid was enriched in pericycle of sample RGgxdxjcy and in cork of samples RGgxpnzt and RGlw as well as in phloem of other samples. For all samples, phloem contained the highest amount of coumarin. Cinnamyl alcohol showed the highest content in phloem of one sample, in pericycle of six samples and in cork of others; thus, for this component, the pattern of distribution was difficult to determine. The irregularity may be due to its low content and/or its tendence to esterify easily.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

The contents of coumarin (co), cinnamyl alcohol (al), cinnamic acid (ac), 2-methoxycinnamaldehyde (me), cinnamaldehyde (de) in the tissue samples

Conclusions

In the present study, an approach using LMD combined with UPLC-Q/TOF–MS was established to map the distribution of essential oils in tissues of various specifications of Cinnamomi Cortex. It is the first report with respect to tissue-specific metabolites in the cortex of an herb. This histochemical study identified Cinnamomi Cortex phloem as the tissue richest in essential oils. Thus, it would be logical to deduce that Cinnamomi Cortex with thick phloem is of better quality as it contains more active constituents. In fact, this is consistent with the traditional processing method of removing the outer bark. Our analytical method provides references for evaluating the quality and classifying the grades of Cinnamomi Cortex by thickness of phloem. Further studies can be conducted to explore the factors affecting phloem thickness. Therefore, this research can be of great importance in the cultivation, harvesting, processing and clinical application of Cinnamomi Cortex.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

WZ and ZL initiated and all authors designed the study. WZ carried out the histochemical experiment and drafted the manuscript. PL and ZZ provided technical support. All authors contributed to the data analysis and to finalizing the manuscript. ZZ has made his intellectual contributions in authenticating the materials. JC contributed her intellectual content for revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Project No. 11475248). We acknowledge Mr. Alan Ho from the School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, for his technical assistance. We also acknowledge Shenzhen Tsumura Co. Ltd for the help in sample collection.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, Department of Pharmacognosy School of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
(2)
School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, China

References

  1. Zhang GZ, Zhang SN, Meng QH, Wang XD (2009) GC-MS analysis on chemical components of Cortex Cinnamomi and Guipi. Chin J Pharm Anal 29:1256–1259Google Scholar
  2. Chen PY, Yu JW, Lu FL, Lin MC, Cheng HF (2016) Differentiating parts of Cinnamomum cassia using LC-qTOF-MS in conjunction with principal components analysis. Biomed Chromatogr 30:1449–1457View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Yuan PF, Shang MY, Cai SQ (2012) Study on fingerprints of chemical constituents of Cinnamomi ramulus and Cinnamomi cortex. Chin J Chin Mater Med 37:2917–2921Google Scholar
  4. Mathew S, Abraham TE (2006) Studies on the antioxidant activities of cinnamon (Cinnamonum verum) bark extracts, through various in vitro models. Food Chem 94:520–528View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Subash Babu P, Prabuseenivasan S, Ignacimuthu S (2007) Cinnamaldehyde: a potential antidiabetic agent. Phymed 14:15–22Google Scholar
  6. An FL, Zhang Z, Xiang CK, Kang LF (2009) Component analysis of essential oils from Cinnamon and their inhibition action against platelet aggregation. Chin Pharm 18:25–27Google Scholar
  7. Giordani R, Regli P, Kaloustian J, Portugal H (2006) Potentiation of antifungal activity of amphotericin B by essential oil from Cinnamomum cassia. Phytother Res 20:58–61View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ding Y, Wu EQ, Liang C, Chen JB, Tran MN, Hong CH, Jang Y, Park KL, Bae K, Kim YH, Kang JS (2011) Discrimination of cinnamon bark and cinnamon twig samples sourced from various countries using HPLC-based fingerprint analysis. Food Chem 127:755–760View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. He ZD, Qiao CF, Han QB, Cheng CL, Xu HX, Jiang RW, But PH, Shaw PC (2005) Authentication and quantitative analysis on the chemical profile of cassia bark (Cortex Cinnamomi) by high-pressure liquid chromatography. J Agric Food Chem 53:2424–2428View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang YT, Pan T, Wen J, Tang XY, Sun YS, Chi L, Peng P, Shi RB (2015) Quality representation and correlation analysis of the characteristic spectrum of Rougui based on drug system. J Beijing Univ Tradit Chin Med 38:344–350Google Scholar
  11. Wei L, Song YL, Guo XY, Tu PF, Jiang Y (2014) Habitat differentiation and degradation characterization of Cinnamomi Cortex by 1H NMR spectroscopy coupled with multivariate statistical analysis. Food Res Int 67:155–162Google Scholar
  12. Shan B, Cai YZ, Brooks JD, Corke H (2007) Antibacterial properties and major bioactive components of Cinnamon Stick (Cinnamomum burmannii): activity against foodborne pathogenic bacteria. J Agric Food Chem 55:5484–5490View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen P, Sun JH, Ford P (2014) Differentiation of the four major species of cinnamons (C. burmannii, C. verum, C. cassia, and C. loureiroi) using a flow injection mass spectrometric (FIMS) fingerprinting method. J Agric Food Chem 62:2516–2521View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Liao SG, Yuan T, Zhang C, Yang SP, Wu Y, Yue JM (2009) Cinnacassides A-E, five geranylphenylacetate glycosides from Cinnamomum cassia. Tetrahedron 65:883–887View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Anderson RA, Broadhurst CL, Polansky MM, Schmidt WF, Khan A, Flanagan VP, Schoene NW, Graves DJ (2004) isolation and characterization of polyphenol type-A polymers from cinnamon with insulin-like biological activity. J Agric Food Chem 52:65–70View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Avula B, Smilliea TJ, Wang YH, Zweigenbaum J, Khan IA (2014) Authentication of true cinnamon (Cinnamomi Cortex verum) utilising direct analysis in real time (DART)-QToF-MS. Food Addit Contam 32:1–8View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement