Open Access

N-Benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole-based hyperbranched polymers by direct arylation polymerization

  • Tam Huu Nguyen1,
  • Thu Anh Nguyen1, 3,
  • Hoan Minh Tran1,
  • Le-Thu T. Nguyen1,
  • Anh Tuan Luu1,
  • Jun Young Lee3 and
  • Ha Tran Nguyen1, 2Email author
Chemistry Central Journal201711:135

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-017-0367-0

Received: 6 July 2017

Accepted: 14 December 2017

Published: 21 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Although poly(N-acyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole)s have attracted great attention as a new class of conducting polymers with highly stabilized energy levels, hyperbranched polymers based on this monomer type have not yet been studied. Thus, this work aims at the synthesis of novel hyperbranched polymers containing N-benzoyl dithieno[3,23,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole acceptor unit and 3-hexylthiophene donor moiety via the direct arylation polymerization method. Their structures, molecular weights and thermal properties were characterized via 1H NMR and FTIR spectroscopies, GPC, TGA, DSC and XRD measurements, and the optical properties were investigated by UV–vis and fluorescence spectroscopies.

Results

Hyperbranched conjugated polymers containing N-benzoyl dithieno[3,23,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole acceptor unit and 3-hexylthiophene donor moiety, linked with either triphenylamine or triphenylbenzene as branching unit, were obtained via direct arylation polymerization of the N-benzoyl dithieno[3,23,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole, 2,5-dibromo 3-hexylthiophene and tris(4-bromophenyl)amine (or 1,3,5-tris(4-bromophenyl)benzene) monomers. Organic solvent-soluble polymers with number-average molecular weights of around 18,000 g mol−1 were obtained in 80–92% yields. The DSC and XRD results suggested that the branching structure hindered the stacking of polymer chains, leading to crystalline domains with less ordered packing in comparison with the linear analogous polymers. The results revealed that the hyperbranched polymer with triphenylbenzene as the branching unit exhibited a strong red-shift of the maximum absorption wavelength, attributed to a higher polymer stacking order as a result of the planar structure of triphenylbenzene.

Conclusion

Both hyperbranched polymers with triphenylamine/triphenylbenzene as branching moieties exhibited high structural order in thin films, which can be promising for organic solar cell applications. The UV–vis absorption of the hyperbranched polymer containing triphenylbenzene as branching unit was red-shifted as compared with the triphenylamine-containing polymer, as a result of a higher chain packing degree.

Keywords

N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole3-HexylthiopheneHyperbranched polymersDirect arylation polymerization

Background

Conjugated polymers have received significant attention in fundamental and applied research owing to their interesting optical and optoelectronic properties. Thus, they have been used in many electronic applications such as light emitting diode (OLED), polymeric solar cells (PSCs), electrochromic devices, organic field-effect transistors (OFETs), chemo-and biosensors [14]. In these extensive applications, the donor–acceptor (D–A) type of conjugated polymers, consisting of both electron donor and electron acceptor substituents along the conjugated backbone with excellent electron mobility, broad absorption spectrum and properly matched energy levels, has generated significant interest in the field of PSCs [510]. Especially, conjugated polymers composed of various thiophene-based electron donating units have shown promising properties to be suitable as hole-transporting materials in electro-optical devices [1113].

On the other hand, N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole belongs to a new class of dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrroles incorporating N-acyl groups with highly stabilized energy levels, which have been studied for some years [14]. Evenson and Rasmussen [15] have reported for the first time the synthesis of the N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole and analogous monomers via copper-catalyzed amidation. N-octanoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole was further electropolymerized, resulting in poly(N-octanoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole) with a polymeric bandgap of 1.60 eV [15]. An N-substituted benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole was copolymerized with 4,7-dithieno-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole to give a polymer with a low band gap of 1.44 eV, the PSC of which had a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 3.95% [16]. Poly(N-alkanoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole-alt-quinoxaline)s have been shown to afford PSCs with high open-circuit voltages and PCEs up to 4.81% [17]. More recently, Busireddy et al. [18] have reported the synthesis of a small molecule containing dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole (DTP) and butylrhodanine as donor and acceptor moieties. PSCs fabricated from this donor material and [6]-phenyl-C71-butyric acid methyl ester as acceptor reached a PCE of 6.54% [18].

Hyperbranched conjugated polymers with highly branched molecular structure can effectively suppress aggregation and therefore are attractive due to good solubility and processability, low viscosity as well as facile one-pot synthesis and tunable electrical properties. Despite extensive research on the synthesis of hyperbranched conducting polymers in the past [1921], in the last couple of years considerable effort has been put into the development of hyperbranched conjugated structures based on new compositional units. The Cu(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne click reaction was used to synthesize an ethynyl-capped hyperbranched conjugated polytriazole [22]. Zhou et al. [23] employed Suzuki coupling polymerization to obtain hyperbranched polymers based on alkyl-modified 2,4,6-tris(thiophen-2-yl)-1,3,5-triazine and fluorene units with high molecular weights and enhanced two-photon absorption as compared with their unsubstituted analogues. The Suzuki polymerization was also used to one-pot synthesize a hyperbranched conjugated polymer bearing dimethylamino groups to be used as a PSC cathode interlayer [24]. Sen et al. [25] synthesized hyperbranched conjugated polymers based on 4,4′‐difluoro‐4‐bora‐3a,4a‐diaza‐s‐indacene (BODIPY) via Sonogashira cross coupling polymerization reactions. The polymers showed red shifts in absorption and emission maxima upon contact with toluene and benzene vapors. Very recently, hyperbranched thiophene-flanked diketopyrrolopyrrole (TDPP)-based polymers with narrow bandgaps were prepared by direct arylation polymerization method [26]. Knoevenagel condensation and Sonogashira coupling methods were used to synthesize different hyperbranched conjugated polymers, which were tested as chemosensors for detecting nitroaromatic compounds [2729]. The base-catalyzed reactions between α,β-unsaturated ester and aldehyde was employed to synthesize hyperbranched conjugated polymers containing 1,3-butadiene repeating units and carboxylic ester side groups for sensing metal ion Fe3+ [30].

To the best of our knowledge, N-acyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole-based hyperbranched conjugated polymers have not yet been studied. In this research, we present the synthesis of hyperbranched polymers having N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole and 3-hexylthiophene monomer units, linked with triphenylamine or triphenylbenzene as chain extender, via the direct arylation polycondensation [31]. Besides the role of branch-forming units, triphenylamine and triphenylbenzene are also typical donor moieties in conjugated polymeric materials for optoelectronic devices [3237]. The optical and thermal properties and the nanostructures of the obtained hyperbranched polymers were characterized, and the effect of polymer aggregation on optical properties was investigated.

Results and discussion

Two hyperbranched polymers having N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole and 3-hexylthiophene monomer units linked with triphenylamine or triphenylbenzene as chain extender, named as PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB, respectively, were aimed to be synthesized. Their synthesis pathways are illustrated in Schemes 1 and 2, respectively.
Scheme 1

Direct arylation polycondensation of N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole, 3-hexylthiophene and tris(4-bromophenyl)amine monomers, resulting in PBDP3HTTPA

Scheme 2

Direct arylation of polycondensation of N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole monomers, 3-hexylthiophene and 1,3,5-tris(4-bromophenyl)benzene monomers, resulting in PBDP3HTTPB

Monomer synthesis

Tris(4-bromophenyl)amine was synthesized via bromination using N-bromosuccinimide, according to a procedure previously reported [38]. On the other hand, 1,3,5-tris(4-bromophenyl)benzene was synthesized from 4-bromoacetophenone using H2SO4 (conc.) and K2S2O7 as the catalytic system following the procedure reported by Prasad et al. [39]. N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole (monomer 3) was prepared via an amidation reaction by using copper(I) iodide and DMEDA as the catalytic system in the presence of K2CO3 at the reflux temperature for 24 h [15].

The structure of monomer 3 was determined via 1H NMR. The 1H NMR spectrum of monomer 3 (Fig. 1) shows a doublet peak at 7.73 ppm (peak c), a triplet peak at 7.65 ppm (peak e, Fig. 1) and a triplet peak at 7.55 ppm (peak d) corresponding to the protons of the benzene ring. The doublet peak at 7.1 ppm (peak b) and the singlet peak at 6.85 ppm (peak a) are assigned to the protons of the thiophene rings. The presence of these peaks, along with their integral ratios, indicate that the amidation reaction has taken place successfully to give the N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole monomer.
Fig. 1

1H NMR spectrum of N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole (monomer 3)

Direct arylation polycondensation

The chemical structures of hyperbranched conjugated polymers PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB and corresponding monomers are shown in Schemes 1 and 2, respectively. The monomers N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole (3) and 2,5-dibromo-3-hexylthiophene (4) underwent direct arylation polycondensation with tris(4-bromophenyl)amine (1) (or 1,3,5-tris(4-bromophenyl)benzene (2)) to build hyperbranched conjugated polymer structures. The polycondensation was carried out in the DMAc solvent at 100 °C with Pd(OAc)2 and PCy3.HBF4 as the catalyst and ligand, respectively. The PBDP3HTTPA hyperbranched polymer was synthesized by polymerization of a mixture of monomers (1), (3) and (4), the solution of which became dark orange after 2 h, and gradually turned into black accompanying the appearance of a solvent-insoluble black solid. After 24 h, the hyperbranched polymer was obtained by purification via extraction, filtration via a Celite layer to remove the Pd catalyst, subsequent washing and precipitation in cold n-heptane. On the other hand, the polymerization mixture of monomers (2), (3) and (4) showed a red color in 3 h after initiation, which then gradually changed into dark red. The obtained PBDP3HTTPB was purified in a similar way to PBDP3HTTPA. The yield of both reactions were in the range of 80–90% after 24 h. It should be noted that the solvent-insoluble part (about 5%) and soluble oligomer fraction were removed via filtration through Celite layer and via washing with acetone, respectively. The number average molecular weights (Mns) as determined by GPC relative to polystyrene standards of PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB were 18,000 and 16,700 g mol−1, with polydispersities of 2.1 and 2.3, respectively (Fig. 2, Table 1). These hyperbranched conjugated polymers were soluble well in common organic solvents such as chloroform, THF, toluene, DMAc and insoluble in methanol, diethyl ether and n-heptane.
Fig. 2

GPC traces of hyperbranched conjugated polymers PBDP3HTTPA (solid line) and PBDP3HTTPB (dash line)

Table 1

Characteristics of hyperbranched conjugated polymers prepared via direct arylation polycondensation of monomers 1, 3 and 4 (PBDP3HTTPA)a, and of monomers 2, 3 and 4 (PBD3HTTBP)b

Entry

Polymer

Temp (oC)

Yield (%)c

Mn (g mol−1)d

Mw/M n d

3HT: BD: TPA (TPB) molar ratioe (r)

1

PBDP3HTTPA

100

82

18,000

2.1

1:1.18:1.45

2

PBDP3HTTPB

100

90

16,700

2.3

1:1.38:1.59

aConditions: [1]0 = 44 mM; [3]0 = [4]0 = 33 mM; [Pd(OAc)2] = 1.6 mM; [PCy3.HBF4]0 = 3.0 mM; [PivOH]0 = 30 mM

bConditions: [2]0 = 44 mM; [3]0 = [4]0 = 33 mM; [Pd(OAc)2] = 1.6 mM; [PCy3.HBF4]0 = 3.0 mM; [PivOH]0 = 30 mM

cAfter removal of chroloform-insoluble and acetone-soluble fractions

dDetermined by GPC with THF as eluent and polystyrene calibration

eMolar ratio between 3-hexylthiophene, N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole and triphenylamine (or triphenylbenzene) units calculated by 1H NMR, based on the integration ratio between peak f at 2.6 ppm and o at 7.7 ppm (Fig. 2a) for P3HT3HTTPA, and the integration between peak f and overlapping shift range of peaks l, m and n around 7.75 ppm for P3HT3HTTBP

Polymer structure

The polymer structures were characterized by transmission FT-IR and 1H NMR spectroscopies. The FT-IR spectra of PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB displayed several bands between 2850 and 3060 cm−1 asigned to CH stretching modes of n-hexyl groups and ring C–H stretching vibrations. The bands at 1585 and 1492 cm−1 are ascribed to the aromatic C=C stretching and aromatic C–H deformation vibrations, respectively, while the bands at 1323 and 1274 cm−1 are assigned to the C–N stretching of triphenylamine units. The appearance of a strong absorption band at 1700 cm−1 indicates the existence of C=O group of the N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole moiety in the polymer structure. The bands at 696 and 628 cm−1 are ascribed to the thiophene C–S–C bending and S–C stretching vibrations, respectively.

In the 1H NMR spectrum of hyperbranched conjugated polymer PBDP3HTTPA (Fig. 3a), a signal was observed 7.65 ppm (peak o) assignable to the phenyl proton in the para position of the N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole moiety. The peaks from 6.85 ppm to 7.60 ppm are attributed to the aromatic protons of triphenylamine and thiophene units. Moreover, the 1H NMR spectrum of PBDP3HTTPA showed all characteristic peaks of the 3-hexylthiophene, triphenylamine, and N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole repeating units. Similarly, the 1H NMR spectrum of PBDP3HTTPB (Fig. 3b) also showed all characteristic peaks of the 3-hexylthiophene, triphenylbenzene and N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole repeating units. These results indicate that direct arylation coupling polymerization successfully took place to form the expected polymers. Additionally, we noted clearly the disappearance of the signal at 7.35 ppm in the spectrum of PBDP3HTTPA, which was originally aromatic protons closest to bromide in tris(4-bromophenyl)amine (compound 1). Similarly, the signal at 7.51 ppm disappears in the spectrum of PBDP3HTTPB, which was originally aromatic protons closest to bromide in 1,3,5-tris(4-bromophenyl)benzene (compound 2). These suggest that all three bromide groups of compound 1 and 2 were consumed, suggesting the formation of hyperbranched structures.
Fig. 3

1H NMR spectra of PBDP3HTTPA (a) and PBDP3HTTPB (b) in CDCl3

To reach more insights into the polymer structures, the unit ratio of 3-hexylthiophene (3HT) versus N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole (BD) was calculated based on the integration values of the thiophene-CH2 proton signal at 2.6 ppm (peak f, Fig. 2a) and the benzoyl ortho proton signal of N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole at 7.7 ppm (peak o, Fig. 3a). Taking into account that the molar ratio between the total number of 3HT and BD units versus the number of TPA units is 1.5, a compositional molar ratio (r) between BD, 3HT and TPA units of 1:1.18:1.45 was determined. In the case of PBDP3HTTPB, r was calculated based on the integration ratio between the thiophene-CH2 proton signal at 2.6 ppm (peak f, Fig. 3b) and the overlapping shift range of aromatic proton signals around 7.75 ppm of BD (peak q corresponding to 1 proton, Fig. 2b) and triphenylbenzene (peak l, m, n corresponding to 3 protons, Fig. 3b) moieties, taking into acount the molar ratio between the total number of 3HT and BD units versus the number of TPB units being 1.5. PBDP3HTTPB had a compositional molar ratio (r) between BD, 3HT and TPB units of 1:1.38:1.59. The characteristics of the obtained hyperbranched conjugated polymers are presented in Table 1. However, we could not determine the degree of branching by the use of 1H NMR integration, since the chemical shifts of branching, terminal, and linear units could not be differentiated.

In addition to the NMR results, which indirectly confirm the formation of hyperbranched structures, controlled experiments were also performed. Accordingly, one reactive site of the monomer 3-hexylthiophene (monomer 4) was blocked with a carbaldehyde (–CHO) group to give in 3-hexylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde. Direct arylation reaction between 3-hexylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde and tris(4-bromophenyl)amine (compound 1) was then conducted. Attributed to the non-participation of the carbaldehyde group in the direct arylation reaction, no hyperbranched structure was obtained, as indicated by the low molecular weight (below 1000 g mol−1) of the product determined by GPC and mass spectroscopic analysis. The 1H and 13C NMR results also indicated a corresponding star-structure formed from 3-hexylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde and tris(4-bromophenyl)amine. These results suggest that a hyperbranched structure could only be generated with the participation of both reactive sites of the monomer.

It should also be noted that in other controlled experiments, the direct arylation reaction between tris(4-bromophenyl)amine and N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole provided a polymer product with a poor solubility, suggesting that a hyperbranched structure was formed. On the other hand, the direct arylation reaction between tris(4-bromophenyl)amine and 3-hexylthiophene resulted in a polymer product with Mn of around 15,000 g mol−1 and Đ of 2.1.

Thermal properties

The thermal properties of hyperbranched PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB were investigated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). TGA under nitrogen flow was used to evaluate the thermal stability of the purified hyperbranched conjugated polymers in the range from room temperature to 800 °C. PBDP3HTTPA exhibited good thermal stability with decomposition temperature (5% weight loss) around 250 °C (see Fig. 4). The TGA diagram of PBDP3HTTPB showed a mass loss of 5 wt% at 300 °C as the threshold for thermal decomposition, and a loss of about 70 wt% at 500 °C.
Fig. 4

TGA curves of PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB

The second heating run DSC diagram in the range from 0 to 250 °C of the conjugated hyperbranched polymers are shown in Fig. 5. No transition in this temperature range was detected for PBDP3HTTPB, while a relatively broad endotherm ascribed to a melting peak at 110 °C was observed for PBDP3HTTPA. It is well-known that linear poly(3-hexylthiophene) and poly(dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole) chains are generally stiff with very strong intermolecular π-π stacking interactions, resulting in high melting temperatures normally above 200 °C [4042]. Thus, the branching structure hindered the stacking of polymer chains, leading to crystalline domains with less ordered packing and so a low melting temperature range in comparison with the linear analogous polymers. On the other hand, because of the planar structure of TPB units, PBDP3HTTPB exhibits a higher oder of chain stacking than PBDP3HTTPA with propeller-like TPA moieties.
Fig. 5

Second-heating run DSC curves (exo up) of PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB DSC was performed under nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1

Solid structure

The photophysical properties of conjugated polymers are affected by their nanostructures of solid state films. Therefore, the molecular ordering of the PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB hyperbranched polymers in the solid state was investigated by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements (Fig. 6). The XRD patterns of PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB exhibit two distinctive diffractions at 2θ = 5.5° and 27.0°, corresponding respectively to an interchain d-spacing of 16.1 Å between neighboring polymer chains separated by n-hexyl side chains [40, 43] and a π–π stacking distance of 3.3 Å. This π–π stacking distance is slightly smaller than that observed for classical poly(3-hexylthiophene) [44, 45] and is close to that observed for dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole-based oligomers and polymers [42, 46]. Because of the difference in the planar geometry of TPB and TPA units, PBDP3HTTPB exhibits a slightly higher ordered packing, indicated by the somewhat higher intensities of diffraction peaks. In addition, the XRD pattern of PBDP3HTTPA shows a broad amorphous halo centered ca. 21° associated with scattering from a disordered packing of n-hexyl side chains [47, 48] whereas this amorphous diffraction is less prominent for PBDP3HTTPB.
Fig. 6

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB powders

Optical properties

Figure 7a, b present the UV–vis spectra of PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB, respectively, measured in different solvents including CHCl3, THF, toluene and in solid state films. PBD3HTTPA showed an absorption maximum at 360 nm in toluene, an absorption maximum at 310 nm and a shoulder peak at 360 nm in CHCl3, and a maximum at 400 nm and a shoulder peak at 310 in THF, indicating slightly different conformations in different solvents. It exhibited a strong red shift in the film with absorption peak at 550 nm, reflecting a higher structural order in thin film.
Fig. 7

Absorption spectra of PBDP3HTTPA (a) and PBDP3HTTPB (b) in different solvents and solid state films

In the case of PBDP3HTTPB, an absorption maximum at around 410–420 nm was observed in CHCl3, THF as well as toluene. However, an addition absorption peak at 750 nm was found for PBDP3HTTPB in THF and toluene, indicating the co-existence of a small fraction of polymer molecules in a more aggregated form. In solid film, besides an absorption maximum at 410 nm, PBDP3HTTPB exhibited an absorption peak at 700 nm, broadening to 850 nm. This reveals that PBDP3HTTPB has a high aggregation degree than PBDP3HTTPA in the solid state, which is in agreement with the DSC and XRD results.

The photoluminescent (PL) spectra of the hyperbranched conjugated polymers in solutions excited at the absorption maxima are shown in Fig. 8a, b. In CHCl3, PBD3HTTPA displayed an emission peak at 545 nm upon excitation at 310 nm, whereas in toluene solution, PBD3HTTPA exhibited triplet peaks at 460, 500 and 560 nm upon excitation at 360 nm. In THF solution, PBD3HTTPA exhibited double peaks at 450 and 500 nm upon excitation at 400 nm. In the case of PBDP3HTTPB upon excitation at 410 nm, the polymer showed peaks at 380 nm and 475 nm in CHCl3, whereas it displayed triplet peaks at 380, 475 and 520 nm in both THF and toluene.
Fig. 8

Fluorescence spectra of PBDP3HTTPA (a) and PBDP3HTTPB (b) (concentrations of 0.05 g L−1)

The fluorescence quantum yields (ϕ F ) of the polymers in dilute CHCl3 were measured in comparison to 9,10-diphenylanthracence as a standard (in cyclohexane ϕ F  = 0.9), and the results are summarized in Table 2. The quantum yields increased from 0.57 for PBDP3HTTPA to 0.62 for PBDP3HTTPB. It is likely that the stronger π–π stacking effect in the structure of PBDP3HTTPB led to a higher quantum yield as a result of a lower nonradiative decay rate [49, 50].
Table 2

UV–vis absorption and fluorescence emission maximum wavelengths, and the fluorescence quantum yields (ϕ F ) of PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB

Solvent

PBDP3HTTPA

PBDP3HTTPB

UV (nm)

PL (nm)

ϕ F

UV (nm)

PL (nm)

ϕ F

CHCl3

310, 360

545

0.57

410

380, 475

0.62

THF

310, 400

450, 500

 

420, 750

380, 475, 520

 

Toluene

360

460, 500, 560

 

420, 750

380, 475, 520

 

Film

550

  

410, 710

  

Solvent-induced aggregation

The aggregation state induced by intermolecular interactions based on π-stacking affects strongly the optical properties of conjugated polymers [51]. In solution, the H-aggregates (with parallel aligned transition dipoles) and J-aggregates (with head-to-tail aligned transition dipoles) show distinct changes in the absorption band, i.e. bathochromic (red) shifts or hypsochromic (blue) shifts, respectively, compared to the monomeric species [52, 53]. Molecular aggregation can possibly be induced by addition of a non-solvent to a polymer solution. Figure 9 shows the absorption spectra of the PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB hyperbranched polymers, measured in CHCl3/methanol mixtures. The π–π* absorption band of PBDP3HTTPA was located at 310 nm in pure CHCl3, indicating the coil conformation of polymer chains. The addition of methanol from 10 to 90% to polymer solution induced slight bathochromic shifts, indicating conformational changes toward the formation of aggregates. A similar effect was observed for PBDP3HTTPB when adding small amounts of methanol from 10 to 40%. Moreover, at higher methanol contents, strong red shifts were observed, indicating significant chain aggregation. Correspondingly, the absorption maximum of P3HTBTTPA shifted to 500, 520 and 550 nm at methanol contents of 60, 80 and 90%, respectively. These results also confirm that PBDP3HTTPB exhibits a higher tendency to form aggregate than PBDP3HTTPA.
Fig. 9

UV–vis spectra of PBDP3HTTPA (a) and PBDP3HTTPB (b) measured in CHCl3/MeOH mixtures

Conclusions

We have demonstrated the successful synthesis of novel hyperbranched conjugated polymers containing N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole and 3-hexylthiophene monomer units, linked with the triphenylamine or triphenylbenzene moiety (PBDP3HTTPA and PBDP3HTTPB, respectively), via direct arylation polycondensation in 80–90% yields. The molecular weights of the obtained polymers were 18,000 g mol−1 for PBDP3HTTPA and 16,700 g mol−1 for PBDP3HTTPB. Both polymers exhibited high structural order in thin films, which can be promising for organic solar cell applications. The UV–vis absorption of PBDP3HTTPB containing triphenylbenzene as branching unit was red-shifted as compared with PBDP3HTTPA, as a result of a higher chain packing degree. Generally, the results proved that the optical properties of these hyperbranched conjugated polymers could be controlled via alteration of the branching unit, which is useful for potential application as optoelectronic materials.

Experimental

Materials

3-Hexylthiophene (3HT) was purchased from TCI (Tokyo, Japan). triphenylamine, benzo [c] [1,2,5] thiadiazole, tetrahydrofuran (99.9%) and N-bromosuccinimide were purchased from Acros Organics. Palladium(II) acetate (Pd(OAc)2) (98%), tricyclohexylphosphine tetrafluoroborate (97%, PCy3·HBF4), 3,3′dibromo-2,2′bithiophene, benzamide, N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine (85%, DMEDA) and pivalic acid (PivOH) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Potasium acetate (KOAc), sodium carbonate (99%), magnesium sulfate (98%), and copper iodine (CuI) were purchased from Acros and used as received. Chloroform (CHCl3, 99.5%), toluene (99.5%), and dimethylacetamide (DMAc, 99%) were purchased from Fisher/Acros and dried using molecular sieves under N2. Dichloromethane (99.8%), n-heptane (99%), methanol (99.8%), ethyl acetate (99%) and diethyl ether (99%) were purchased from Fisher/Acros and used as received.

Characterization

1H NMR spectra were recorded in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) with TMS as an internal reference, on a Bruker Avance 300 MHz. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra, collected as the average of 64 scans with a resolution of 4 cm−1, were recorded from KBr disk on the FT-IR Bruker Tensor 27. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) measurements were performed on a Polymer PL-GPC 50 gel permeation chromatograph system equipped with an RI detector, with tetrahydrofuran as the eluent at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. Molecular weight and molecular weight distribution were calculated with reference to polystyrene standards. UV–vis absorption spectra of polymers in solution and polymer thin films were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-2450 spectrometer over a wavelength range of 300–700 nm. Fluorescence spectra were measured on a HORIBA IHR 325 spectrometer. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were carried out with a DSC 204 F1—NETZSCH instruments under nitrogen flow (heating rate 10 °C min−1). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) measurements were performed under nitrogen flow using a STA 409 PC Instruments with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 from ambient temperature to 800 °C. Wide-angle powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded at room temperature on a Bruker AXS D8 Advance diffractometer using Cu-Kα radiation (k = 0.15406 nm), at a scanning rate of 0.05 degrees per second. The data were analyzed using DIFRAC plus Evaluation Package (EVA) software. The d-spacing was calculated from peak positions using Cu-Kα radiation and Bragg’s law.

Synthesis of tris(4-bromophenyl)amine (1)

N-bromosuccinimide (2.17 g, 12.2 mmol) and triphenylamine (1 g, 4.08 mmol) were added to anhydrous THF (10 mL) at 0 °C under nitrogen. The mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 1.5 h. After completion of the reaction, 10 mL of distilled water was added to the reaction mixture, which was extracted with dichloromethane. The organic layer was washed with 10% solution of Na2S2O3 and 10% solution of KOH, dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated. The product was precipitated in cold n-heptane and dried under vacuum to give a white powder (Rf = 0.6; yield: 67%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 7.35 (d, 6H), 6.95 (d, 6H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): (ppm): 146.10, 132.42, 125.68, 116.17. MS m/z (M+) 478. Analysis calculated for C18H12Br3N: C, 45.1; H, 2.51; Br, 49.49; N, 2.92. Found: C, 45.35; H, 2.41; Br, 49.35; N, 2.89.

Synthesis of 1,3,5-tris(4-bromophenyl)benzene (2)

4-Bromoacetophenone (5 g, 25.13 mmol), 0.25 mL of H2SO4 (conc.) and K2S2O7 (6.6 g, 26.14 mmol) were heated at 180 °C for 16 h under a nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting crude solid was cooled to room temperature and refluxed in 25 mL of dry ethanol (EtOH) for 1 h and then cooled to room temperature. The solution was filtered and the resulting solid was refluxed in 25 mL of H2O to give a pale yellow solid that was then filtered. The crude product was dried under vacuum giving 7.5 g of dried product, which was recrystallized from CHCl3 (yield 55%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3), (ppm): 7.51 (d, 6H), 7.60 (d, 6H), 7.68 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): (ppm): 139.82, 137.60, 130.23, 122.72, 121.43. MS m/z (M+) 539. Analysis calculated for C24H15Br3: C, 53.34; H, 2.77; Br, 43.89. Found: C, 53.25; H, 2.69; Br, 44.06.

Synthesis of N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole monomer (BD) (3)

To a 50 mL rounded-bottomed flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer was added copper iodide (0.19 g, 1 mmol), DMEDA (1.728 mL, 8 mmol), potassium carbonate (4.15 g, 30 mmol) in the nitrogen atmosphere. Then, toluene and a small amount of distilled water (1 equiv.) were added to the reaction mixture and the solution was stirred for 30 min. Benzamide (12 mmol) was added, followed by 3,3′-dibromo-2,2′-bithiophene (3.24 g, 10 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at 110 °C. The reaction was cooled to the room temperature, then washed with distilled water (3 × 20 mL) and extracted with chloroform (3 × 20 mL). The organic phase was dried by anhydrous K2CO3. The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. The crude product was purified by silica column chromatography (eluent: heptane/ethyl acetate: 4/1) to give the isolated product as a white crystalline solid (3.82 g, Rf = 0.75, yield: 45.3%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm) 7.73 (d, 2H), 7.65 (t, 1H), 7.55 (t, 2H), 7.1 (d, 2H), 6.85 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): (ppm): 167.0, 143.1, 134.5, 132.4, 128.7, 124.4, 121.8, 116.4; MS m/z [MNa]+: 306.04.

Synthesis of hyperbranched polymer based on N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole, 3-hexylthiophene and tris(4-bromophenyl)amine monomer moieties (PBDP3HTTPA) (5)

In a glove box, 28.34 mg (0.1 mmol) of N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole, 64.27 mg (0.133 mmol) of tris(4-bromophenyl)amine and 16.83 mg (0.1 mmol) of 3-hexylthiophene were dissolved in 3 mL of DMAc. To the solution, 1.03 mg (0.0048 mmol) of Pd(OAc)2, 3.46 mg (0.009 mmol) of PCy3.HBF4, 9.43 mg (0.09 mmol) of PivOH and 38.3 mg of K2-CO3 were added to the monomer solution. The vial was sealed with a rubber cap and then removed from the glove box. The vial was heated in a 100 °C oil bath for 24 h. After being cooled to room temperature, the reaction mixture was diluted with 30 mL of chloroform. The obtained organic layer was passed through Celite to remove the Pd catalyst and the insoluble polymer fraction, subsequently washed with 10% solution of Na2S2O3 and distilled water, dried over Na2CO3, concentrated and finally poured into a large amount of cold n-heptane to precipitate the polymer. The resulting polymer was isolated by filtration, washed with acetone to remove oligomers, and finally dried under reduced pressure at 50 °C for 24 h. A yield of 82% was obtained. FT-IR (cm−1): 3057, 2925, 2852, 1700, 1585, 1492, 1436, 1323, 1273, 1182, 1116, 1026, 825, 750, 721, 696, 606, 628, 542. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm) 7.73 (d, 12H), 2.65 (s, 2H), 0.8–1.95 (m, 11H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): 167.0; 143.3, 141.0, 135.8, 132.7, 129.6, 128.7, 127.0, 126.2, 124.4, 122.1, 116.4, 32.1, 30.7, 29.0, 22.5, 14.0. GPC: M n  = 18,000 g mol−1. Đ = M w /M n  = 2.1

Synthesis of hyperbranched polymer based on N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole, 3-hexylthiophene and 1,3,5-tris(4-bromophenyl)benzene monomer moieties (PBDP3HTTPB) (6)

In a glove box, 28.34 mg (0.1 mmol) of N-benzoyl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole, 72.45 mg (0.133 mmol) of 1,3,5-tris(4-bromophenyl)benzene and 16.83 mg (0.1 mmol) of 3-hexylthiophene were dissolved in 3 mL of DMAc. To the solution, 1.03 mg (0.0048 mmol) of Pd(OAc)2, 3.46 mg (0.009 mmol) of PCy3.HBF4, 9.43 mg (0.09 mmol) of PivOH and 38.3 mg of K2-CO3 were added to the monomer solution. The vial was sealed with a rubber cap and then removed from the glove box. The vial was heated in a 100 °C oil bath for 24 h. After being cooled to room temperature, the reaction mixture was diluted with 30 mL of chloroform. The obtained organic layer was passed through Celite to remove the Pd catalyst and the insoluble polymer fraction, subsequently washed with 10% solution of Na2S2O3 and distilled water, dried over Na2CO3, concentrated and finally poured into a large amount of cold n-heptane to precipitate the polymer. The resulting polymer was isolated by filtration, washed with acetone to remove oligomers, and finally dried under reduced pressure at 50 °C for 24 h. A yield of 90% was obtained. FT-IR (cm−1): 3059, 2917, 2851, 1700, 1584, 1560, 1490, 1436, 1319, 1274, 1183, 1117, 1011, 825, 753, 721, 696, 628, 542. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm) 7.85–6.9 (d, 13H), 2.65 (s, 2H), 0.8–1.95 (m, 11H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): 167.0; 143.3, 141.0, 135.8, 131.5, 129.0, 127.3, 120.2, 124.4, 122.1, 116.4, 32.1, 30.7, 29.0, 22.5, 14.0. GPC: M n  = 16,700 g mol−1. Đ = M w /M n  = 2.3.

Synthesis of 3-hexylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde (for controlled experiment)

3-Hexylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde was synthesized according to the procedures reported in the literature [54, 55] with some modification. 3-Hexylthiophene (1 g) was dissolved in 100 mL of anhydrous toluene under nitrogen. DMF (4.6 mL, 59.2 mmol) and phosphorus(V)oxychloride (POCl3) (4.91 mL, 58 mmol) were then added to the solution. The reaction was performed at 75 °C for 24 h. The solution was cooled down to room temperature, followed by the addition of a saturated aqueous solution of sodium acetate. The solution was stirred for 4 h. Then, the compound was extracted with CHCl3 and dried over MgSO4. Then the solution was filtered and evaporated to obtain a crude compound. Finally, the crude compound was purified over silica column with hexane/ethyl acetate (v/v: 5/95) as eluent (Rf = 0.8, 0.9 g). The yield was 77.6%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 9.01 (s, 1H), 7.55 (d, 1H), 6.92 (d, 1H), 2.85 (t, 2H), 1.59 (m, 2H), 1.23 (m, 6H), 0.81 (t, 3H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 182.1, 152.8, 138.0, 134.6, 130.5, 31.6, 31.2, 29.0, 28.6, 22.6, 14.0. MS m/z (M+) 196, Analysis calculated for C11H16OS: C, 67.30; H, 8.22; O, 8.15; S, 16.33. Found: C, 66.73; H, 9.05; O, 7.85; S, 16.37.

Direct arylation reaction between 3-hexylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde and tris(4-bromophenyl)amine (controlled experiment)

Direct arylation reaction between 3-hexylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde and tris(4-bromophenyl)amine was performed, resulting in star-shaped 5,5′,5″-(nitrilotris(benzene-4,1-diyl))tris(3-hexylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde). Procedure: 0.1 g (0.51 mmol) of 3-hexylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde and 82.15 mg (0.17 mmol) of tris(4-bromophenyl)amine were dissolved in 20 mL DMAc. To the solution, 5.5 mg (0.025 mmol) of Pd(OAc)2, 19.22 mg (0.05 mmol) of PCy3.HBF4, 52.4 mg (0.5 mmol) of PiOH and 212 mg of K2CO3 were added to the monomer solution. The vial was sealed with a rubber cap and was freeze–pump–thaw degassed for several times. Then the reaction was heated in a 100 °C oil bath for 24 h. After being cooled to room temperature, the reaction mixture was diluted with 100 mL of chloroform, washed with brine three times and dried over MgSO4. The obtained organic layer was passed through Celite to remove the Pd catalyst, concentrated and finally purified over silica column with hexane/ethyl acetate eluent (v/v: 20/80) (Rf = 0.7, 113 mg) to give the isolated product as a dark yellow solid. The yield was 80.1%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 10.1 (s, 1H), 7.60 (d, 6H), 7.13 (s, 3H), 6.9 (d, 6H), 2.6 (t, 6H), 1.59 (m, 6H), 1.33 (m, 18H), 0.91 (t, 9H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 181.7, 152.4, 147.2, 141.0, 127.2, 125.3, 31.6, 29.7, 29.4, 28.0, 22.6, 14.1. MS m/z (M+) 828.4, Analysis calculated for C51H57NO3S3: C, 73.96; H, 6.94; N, 1.69; O, 5.80; S, 11.61. Found: C, 73.46; H, 6.81; N, 1.70; O, 6.60; S, 11.43.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

THN, TAN and HMT carried out the synthesis, and characterization of the monomers and polymers. LTTN, ATL, JYL and HTN carried out the acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data collected and involved in drafting of manuscript, revision of draft for important intellectual content and give final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by The Department of Science and Technology (DOST)—Ho Chi Minh City under Grant Number [88/2016/HĐ-SKHCN].

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Materials Technology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
(2)
Materials Technology Key Laboratory (Mtlab), Vietnam National University-Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
(3)
Department of Chemical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea

References

  1. Sirringhaus H, Tessler N, Friend RH (1998) Integrated optoelectronic devices based on conjugated polymers. Science 280:1741–1744View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AK, Jenekhe SA (1993) Synthesis and processing of heterocyclic polymers as electronic, optoelectronic, and nonlinear optical materials. 2. New series of conjugated rigid-rod polyquinolines and polyanthrazolines. Macromolecules 26:895–905View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao Z, Dodabalapur A, Lovinger AJ (1996) Soluble and processable regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene) for thin film field-effect transistor applications with high mobility. Appl Phys Lett 69:4108–4110View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hancock JM, Gifford AP, Champion RD, Jenekhe SA (2008) Block Co-oligomers for organic electronics and optoelectronics: synthesis, photophysics, electroluminescence, and field-effect charge transport of oligothiophene-b-oligoquinoline-b-oligothiophene triblock co-oligomers. Macromolecules 41:3588–3597View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Dang MT, Hirsch L, Wantz G, Wuest JD (2013) Controlling the morphology and performance of bulk heterojunctions in solar cells. Lessons learned from the benchmark poly(3-hexylthiophene):[6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester system. Chem Rev 113:3734–3765View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Lin Y, Li Y, Zhan X (2012) Small molecule semiconductors for high-efficiency organic photovoltaics. Chem Soc Rev 41:4245–4272View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Osaka I, Saito M, Koganezawa T, Takimiya K (2014) Thiophene-thiazolothiazole copolymers: significant impact of side chain composition on backbone orientation and solar cell performances. Adv Mater 26:331–338View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Earmme T, Hwang YJ, Murari NM, Subramaniyan S, Jenekhe SA (2013) All-polymer solar cells with 3.3% efficiency based on naphthalene diimide-selenophene copolymer acceptor. J Am Chem Soc 135:14960–14963View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Li H, Earmme T, Subramaniyan S, Jenekhe SA (2015) Bis(Naphthalene Imide)diphenylanthrazolines: a new class of electron acceptors for efficient nonfullerene organic solar cells and applicable to multiple donor polymers. Adv Energy Mater 5:1402041View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Li H, Hwang YJ, Courtright BAE, Eberle FN, Subramaniyan S, Jenekhe SA (2015) Fine-tuning the 3D structure of nonfullerene electron acceptors toward high-performance polymer solar cells. Adv Mater 27:3266–3272View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Pan H, Wu Y, Li Y, Liu P, Ong BS, Zhu S, Xu G (2007) Benzodithiophene copolymer—a low-temperature, solution-processed high-performance semiconductor for thin-film transistors. Adv Funct Mater 17:3574–3579View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Li Y, Wu Y, Liu P, Birau M, Pan H, Ong BS (2006) Poly(2,5-bis(2-thienyl)-3,6-dialkylthieno [3,2-b]thiophene)s—high-mobility semiconductors for thin-film transistors. Adv Mater 18:3029–3032View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lim ZB, Xue B, Bomma S, Li H, Sun S, Lam YM, Belcher WJ, Dastoor PC, Grimsdale AC (2011) New moderate bandgap polymers containing alkoxysubstituted-benzo[c][1, 2, 5]thiadiazole and thiophene-based units. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 49:4387–4397View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rasmussen SC, Evenson SJ (2013) Dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole-based materials: synthesis and application to organic electronics. Prog Polym Sci 38:1773–1804View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Evenson SJ, Rasmussen SC (2010) N-acyldithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrroles: second generation dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole building blocks with stabilized energy levels. Org Lett 12:4054–4057View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hong D, Lv M, Lei M, Chen Y, Lu P, Wang Y, Zhu J, Wang H, Gao M, Watkins SE, Chen X (2013) N-acyldithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole-based low-band-gap conjugated polymer solar cells with amine-modified [6]-phenyl-c61-butyric acid ester cathode interlayers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:10995–11003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kesters J, Verstappen P, Vanormelingen W, Drijkoningen J, Vangerven T, Devisscher D, Marin L, Champagne B, Manca J, Lutsen L, Vanderzande D, Maes W (2015) N-acyl-dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole-based low bandgap copolymers affording improved open-circuit voltages and efficiencies in polymer solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 136:70–77View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Busireddy MR, Raju Mantena VN, Chereddy NR, Shanigaram B, Kotamarthi B, Biswas S, Sharma GD, Vaidya JR (2016) A dithieno[3,2-b:2[prime or minute],3[prime or minute]-d]pyrrole based, NIR absorbing, solution processable, small molecule donor for efficient bulk heterojunction solar cells. PCCP 18:32096–32106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Li J, Sun M, Bo Z (2007) Synthesis of hyperbranched polymers with precise conjugation length. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 45:1084–1092View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. He Q, Huang H, Yang J, Lin H, Bai F (2003) Synthesis and spectroscopic properties of a series of hyperbranched conjugated molecules with 1,3,5-triphenylbenzene as cores. J Mater Chem 13:1085–1089View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Qu J, Shiotsuki M, Kobayashi N, Sanda F, Masuda T (2007) Synthesis and properties of carbazole-based hyperbranched conjugated polymers. Polymer 48:6481–6490View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang J, Mei J, Zhao E, Song Z, Qin A, Sun JZ, Tang BZ (2012) Ethynyl-capped hyperbranched conjugated polytriazole: click polymerization, clickable modification, and aggregation-enhanced emission. Macromolecules 45:7692–7703View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhou P, Zhong C, Chen X, Qin J, Mariz I, Maçôas E (2014) New kind of hyperbranched conjugated polymers containing alkyl-modified 2,4,6-Tris(thiophen-2-yl)-1,3,5-triazine unit for enhancing two-photon absorption. Macromolecules 47:6679–6686View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lv M, Li S, Jasieniak JJ, Hou J, Zhu J, Tan ZA, Watkins SE, Li Y, Chen X (2013) A hyperbranched conjugated polymer as the cathode interlayer for high-performance polymer solar cells. Adv Mater 25:6889–6894View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sen CP, Devendar Goud V, Shrestha RG, Shrestha LK, Ariga K, Valiyaveettil S (2016) BODIPY based hyperbranched conjugated polymers for detecting organic vapors. Polym Chem 7:4213–4225View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang K, Wang M (2017) Hyperbranched narrow-bandgap DPP homopolymers synthesized via direct arylation polycondensation. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 55:1040–1047View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang W, Smarsly E, Han J, Bender M, Seehafer K, Wacker I, Schröder RR, Bunz UHF (2017) Truxene-based hyperbranched conjugated polymers: fluorescent micelles detect explosives in water. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:3068–3074View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ma XS, Cui YZ, Ding YQ, Tao FR, Zheng B, Yu RH, Huang W (2017) 2D hyperbranched conjugated polymer for detecting TNT with excellent exciton migration. Sens Actuators B 238:48–57View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Zheng B, Li Y, Tao F, Cui Y, Li T (2017) Enhanced superquenching of the hyperbranched conjugated polymer for the detection of nitroaromatic explosives. Sens Actuators B 241:357–363View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Luo C, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Cai X (2017) Hyperbranched conjugated polymers containing 1,3-butadiene units: metal-free catalyzed synthesis and selective chemosensors for Fe3+ ions. RSC Advs 7:12269–12276View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Suraru SL, Lee JA, Luscombe CK (2016) C–H arylation in the synthesis of π-conjugated polymers. ACS Macro Lett 5:724–729View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Yu J, Zhu W, Tan H, Peng Q (2017) A novel D2-A-D1-A-D2-type donor–acceptor conjugated small molecule based on a benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]dithiophene core for solution processed organic photovoltaic cells. Chem Phys Lett 667:254–259View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Chen L, Li X, Ying W, Zhang X, Guo F, Li J, Hua J (2013) 5,6-Bis(octyloxy)benzo[c][1, 2, 5]thiadiazole-bridged dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells with high open-circuit voltage performance. Eur J Org Chem 2013:1770–1780View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Ma F, Shi W, Mi H, Luo J, Lei Y, Tian Y (2013) Triphenylamine-based conjugated polymer/I complex as turn-on optical probe for mercury(II) ion. Sens Actuators B 182:782–788View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Mallia AR, Hariharan M (2017) Self-assembled donor-acceptor trefoils: long-lived charge separated state through aggregation. J Phys Chem C 121:4778–4788View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lefler KM, Kim CH, Wu YL, Wasielewski MR (2014) Self-assembly of supramolecular light-harvesting arrays from symmetric perylene-3,4-dicarboximide trefoils. J Phys Chem Lett 5:1608–1615View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Berlman IB (1973) Energy transfer parameters of aromatic compounds. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Feng J, Li Y, Yang M (2008) A novel hyperbranched copolymer constituted of triphenylamine and divinyl bipyridyl units. Eur Polym J 44:3314–3319View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Prasad D, Preetam A, Nath M (2013) DBSA catalyzed cyclotrimerization of acetophenones: an efficient synthesis of 1,3,5-triarylbenzenes under solvent-free conditions. C R Chim 16:252–256View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Zen A, Saphiannikova M, Neher D, Grenzer J, Grigorian S, Pietsch U, Asawapirom U, Janietz S, Scherf U, Lieberwirth I, Wegner G (2006) Effect of molecular weight on the structure and crystallinity of poly(3-hexylthiophene). Macromolecules 39:2162–2171View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Koeckelberghs G, De Cremer L, Persoons A, Verbiest T (2007) Influence of the substituent and polymerization methodology on the properties of chiral poly(dithieno[3,2-b:2‘,3‘-d]pyrrole)s. Macromolecules 40:4173–4181View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang W, Li J, Zou L, Zhang B, Qin J, Lu Z, Poon YF, Chan-Park MB, Li CM (2008) Semiconductive polymers containing dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole for organic thin-film transistors. Macromolecules 41:8953–8955View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Chen TA, Wu X, Rieke RD (1995) Regiocontrolled synthesis of poly(3-alkylthiophenes) mediated by rieke zinc: their characterization and solid-state properties. J Am Chem Soc 117:233–244View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Yuan Y, Zhang J, Sun J, Hu J, Zhang T, Duan Y (2011) Polymorphism and structural transition around 54 °c in regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene) with high crystallinity as revealed by infrared spectroscopy. Macromolecules 44:9341–9350View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Dag S, Wang LW (2010) Packing structure of poly(3-hexylthiophene) crystal: ab initio and molecular dynamics studies. J Phys Chem B 114:5997–6000View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Balaji G, Parameswaran M, Jin TM, Vijila C, Furong Z, Valiyaveettil S (2010) Synthesis and hole-transporting properties of highly fluorescent n-aryl dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole-based oligomers. J Phys Chem C 114:4628–4635View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee YH, Yang YL, Yen WC, Su WF, Dai CA (2014) Solution self-assembly and phase transformations of form II crystals in nanoconfined poly(3-hexyl thiophene) based rod-coil block copolymers. Nanoscale 6:2194–2200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Prosa TJ, Winokur MJ, McCullough RD (1996) Evidence of a novel side chain structure in regioregular poly(3-alkylthiophenes). Macromolecules 29:3654–3656View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Bredas JL, Heeger AJ (1990) Theoretical investigation of gas-phase torsion potentials along conjugated polymer backbones: polyacetylene, polydiacetylene, and polythiophene. Macromolecules 23:1150–1156View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Gettinger CL, Heeger AJ (1994) The effect of intrinsic rigidity on the optical properties of PPV derivatives. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 256:507–512View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. DiCésare N, Belletête M, Leclerc M, Durocher G (1999) Intermolecular Interactions in conjugated oligothiophenes. 2. quantum chemical calculations performed on crystalline structures of terthiophene and substituted terthiophenes. J Phys Chem A 103:803–811View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruini A, Caldas MJ, Bussi G, Molinari E (2002) Solid state effects on exciton states and optical properties of PPV. Phys Rev Lett 88:206403View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Ferretti A, Ruini A, Molinari E, Caldas MJ (2003) Electronic properties of polymer crystals: the effect of interchain interactions. Phys Rev Lett 90:086401View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang J, Yao Z, Cai Y, Yang L, Xu M, Li R, Zhang M, Dong X, Wang P (2013) Conjugated linker correlated energetics and kinetics in dithienopyrrole dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ Sci 6:1604–1614View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Koumura N, Wang ZS, Mori S, Miyashita M, Suzuki E, Hara K (2006) Alkyl-functionalized organic dyes for efficient molecular photovoltaics. J Am Chem Soc 128:14256–14257View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017