Open Access

Phenolic constituents from Alisma plantago-aquatica Linnaeus and their anti-chronic prostatitis activity

  • Ya-sheng Huang1, 2,
  • Qi-qi Yu2,
  • Yin Chen2,
  • Min-jie Cheng2 and
  • Li-ping Xie1Email author
Chemistry Central Journal201711:120

Received: 31 August 2017

Accepted: 10 November 2017

Published: 21 November 2017



The plant Alisma plantago-aquatica Linnaeus, which is widely distributed in southwest of China, is the main material of traditional Chinese medicine “Zexie”. It was used as folk medicine for immune-modulation, anti-tumor, anti-inflammatory and antibacterial. Previous chemical studies on A. plantago-aquatica reported the identification of triterpenes, diterpenes, sesquiterpenes, steroids, alkaloids and phenolic acid. Terpenes and phenolic acid were regard as major secondary metabolites from this medicine plant.


A new phenolic acid, plantain A (1), along with four known compounds (25) were isolated and identified from A. plantago-aquatica by extensive chromatographic and spectrometric methods. In the present study, the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, COX-2, PEG2 and TGF-β1 were increased in model group rats, whereas on treatment with the isolated compound (1 and 4) at 50 mg/kg, there was a significant decrease in the cytokine levels. Therefore, the anti-CNP effect of 1 and 4 may be related to their anti-inflammatory properties.


A new phenolic acid and four known phenolic compounds were isolated from A. plantago-aquatica. Moreover, compounds 1 and 4 shows significant anti-chronic prostatitis activity in rats.


A. plantago-aquatica Plantain AChronic prostatitis


Prostatitis is a common urological disease causing urination abnormalities, including urinary urgency, frequent urination, micturition, and dysuria. It also can cause suprapubic, lumbosacral, and perineum pain, together with sexual dysfunction, which is also known as prostatitis syndrome. Prostatitis is responsible for up to 2 million outpatient clinic visits per year, including 8% of all male visits to an urologist and 1% of men presenting to primary care physicians [13]. Cernilton is one of the most widely used drugs for treating chronic non-bacterial prostatitis, but has not achieved significant curative effect in clinic. Recently, more herbal medicine has being used as alternative therapy for prostatitis [1, 2, 46]. Due to its natural constituent and availability, natural herbs which obtained from natural sources are believed to provide less untoward effect profiles and provide greater effectiveness as compared to synthetic drug available over the market.

The plant A. plantago-aquatica, which is widely distributed in southwest of China, is the main material of traditional Chinese medicine “Zexie”. It was used as folk medicine for immune-modulation, anti-tumor and antibacterial [79]. Previous studies on this plant revealed that the water extract of A. plantago-aquatica showed significant anti-chronic prostatitis activity in rats [2]. To further investigate the constituents and screen the bioactive constituents from this herbal medicine, a phytochemical study was performed that resulted in the isolation of one new compound, along with four known phenolic components. Herein, we report the isolation, structural elucidation, and anti-chronic prostatitis activity of compounds 15.

Results and discussion


In continuation of our search for novel bioactive substances from this medicine plant, which has been proven to possess anti-chronic prostatitis activity, one new polyphenolic acid, plantain A (1), was isolated from A. plantago-aquatica by using various chromatographic methods, with four known phenolic compounds (25) (Fig. 1). The structures of the other isolated components ferulic acid (2), rynchopeterine A (3), rynchopeterine B (4) and rosmarinic acid (5) were determined by comparison to the 1H- and 13C-NMR spectral data in the literatures [1012].
Fig. 1

Chemical structures of compounds 15 isolated from A. plantago-aquatica

Compound 1, which had the molecular formula C34H26O13, deduced from the positive-ion HR-ESIMS (m/z 665.1273 [M+Na]+) and 13C-NMR data. The 1H-NMR spectrum showed that the presence of a 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl lactic acid moiety [δ H 6.70 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2″), 6.86 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-5″), 6.60 (1H, dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6″), 3.06 (1H, dd, J = 14.8, 4.0 Hz, H-7″a), 2.93 (1H, dd, J = 14.8, 8.8 Hz, H-7″b), 5.11 (1H, dd, J = 8.8, 4.0 Hz, H-8″)], a (E)-cinnamoyl moiety with three substituents in the benzene ring [δ H 7.49 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-5), 6.67 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-6), 7.86 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-8), 6.55 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-9)], a three-substituted dihydrofuran [δ H 6.73 (1H, s, H-3)], and a 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl [δ H 7.41 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2′), 6.78 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-5′), 7.38 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, H-6′)], suggesting that 1 was a polyphenolic acid [13]. Additionally, the occurrence of a vanillic acid unit in the molecule could be easily deduced from the 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra [δ H 7.52 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.48 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.36 (1H, dd, J = 7.8, 1.8 Hz), 10.78 (1H, s), and 3.75 (3H, s); δ C 144.5, 151.3, 114.3, 129.2, 126.3, 123.0, 168.4, 55.9] [14]. Comparison of the 1H- and 13C-NMR data of 1 with those of salvianolic acid C (SAC) and vanillic acid displayed that the signals were substantially coincident [15]. All the above evidence combined with the detailed 2D-NMR analysis of 1H-1H COSY, HMBC and ROESY (Figs. 2, 3) correlations also implied that compound 1 was composed of SAC unit and vanillic acid unit. Moreover, the C-9″ carboxyl group of the SAC moiety was attached to the C-1′′′ hydroxy group of the vanillic acid. The structure of 1 is an ester dimer of SAC and vanillic acid between the hydroxyl group at C-1′′′ and the carboxylic acid group at C-9″. The suggestion was in accord with the observation of the chemical shift of C-9″ signal upfield shifted from δ 173.8 in SAC to δ 170.5 in 1 and the chemical shift of C-1′′′ signal upfield shifted from δ 151.2 in ADPP to 144.5 in 1 [16, 17]. This was further supported by ROESY correlations of 2′′′-OCH3 with H-5″ and H-6″ and acid hydrolysis of compound 1 with 10 N HCl gave SAC and vanillic acid, which was confirmed by HPLC analysis. Thus, the structure of 1, which was established as shown in 1, is a new phenolic compound, which we named plantain A.
Fig. 2

1H-1HCOSY and key HMBC correlations of 1

Fig. 3

Key ROESY correlations of compound 1

Biological assay

Experimental chronic non-bacterial prostatitis (CNP) was induced in rats by injecting carrageenan into prostate. Rats in drug-treated groups were administered the isolated compounds (15) or cernilton (positive control, i.e., reference standard) for 3 weeks while rats in normal and negative control groups were treated with saline at the same time. After treatment, the relative inflammatory factors, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), prostaglandin E2 (PEG2), and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) of the prostate tissues were measured by ELISA [2, 4].

As shown in Table 1, ELISA detection revealed that compounds 1 and 4 treatments obviously reduced TNF-α, IL-1β, PGE2, COX-2 and TGF-β1 levels compared with the control group. Compounds 1 and 4 markedly decreased the above inflammatory factors expression and showed significant anti-chronic prostatitis activity in rats.
Table 1

Effect of compounds 15 on TNF-α, IL-1β, PGE2, COX-2,TGF-β1 levels


TNF-α (pg/mL)

IL-1β (pg/mL)








91.4 ± 6.1**

89.3 ± 7.2**

57.2 ± 9.3**

17.1 ± 3.7**

84.8 ± 9.9**

Negative control

173.8 ± 11.2

160.3 ± 10.1

130.2 ± 6.9

41.4 ± 1.9

133.1 ± 10.2


121.1 ± 10.5**

132.4 ± 9.7**

80.3 ± 5.7**

20.3 ± 2.4**

119.4 ± 11.7*


101.7 ± 9.9**

124.8 ± 8.0**

119.7 ± 10.9*

26.8 ± 4.1**

101.6 ± 9.7**


169.3 ± 11.7

156.7 ± 12.6

128.1 ± 11.7

39.7 ± 8.5

131.1 ± 12.2


161.1 ± 14.5

151.9 ± 10.3

125.7 ± 10.3

37.8 ± 6.2

129.8 ± 11.5


118.6 ± 10.3**

147.5 ± 11.2*

117.4 ± 8.3**

30.3 ± 1.8**

120.3 ± 11.4*


170.1 ± 9.4

159.9 ± 12.7

129.1 ± 11.9

40.1 ± 5.9

130.6 ± 10.3

Cernilton was tested at a dose of 30 mg/kg, the five compounds (15) were tested at a dose of 50 mg/kg

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, significant as compared to the negative control group; Values are mean ± SD (n = 10)


General procedure

NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AM-400 spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) using standard Bruker pulse programs. Chemical shifts are given as δ values with reference to tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard. Column chromatography separations were carried out on silica gel (200–300 mesh, Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Co. Ltd, Qingdao, P.R. China), ODS (50 mesh, Merck China, Beijing, China), Diaion HP-20 (Pharmacia, Peapack, NJ, USA) and Sephadex LH-20 (Pharmacia, Peapack, NJ, USA). GF254 plates (Qingdao Marine, Qingdao, China) were used for thin layer chromatography, and spots were visualized under UV light or by spraying with 5% H2SO4 in ethanol followed by heating. All other chemicals used were of biochemical reagent grade.

Plant material

Samples of A. plantago-aquatica were collected from Liuzhou City, Guangxi Province in China in May 2015. Taxonomic identification of the plant was performed by Professor Li-ping Xie. A voucher specimen (No. 20150701) has been deposited in the authors’ laboratory.

Extraction and isolation

The dry A. plantago-aquatica (8 kg) were extracted two times under reflux with hot water (100 L × 3 h). After removing the solvent under reduced pressure, the residue was suspended in water and then sequentially extracted with petroleum ether, EtOAc and n-BuOH. The EtOAc extract (103 g) was subjected to silica gel column chromatography (CC) using CHCl3–MeOH (1:0–0:1) and divided into six fractions. Fraction 1 was separated by CC over silica gel using CHCl3–MeOH (9:1–7:3) and Sephadex LH-20 CC using MeOH to obtain 2 (24 mg) and 3 (27 mg). Fraction 3 was separated by CC on Si gel using CHCl3–MeOH (8:2–6:4) to give subfraction 3–1 (5.5 g), subfraction 3–2 (6 g) and subfraction 3–3 (12 g). Subfraction 3–3 was purified by semi-preparative HPLC to afford compounds 1 (20 mg), 4 (27 mg), and 5 (30 mg).

Characterization of plantain A (1)

Obtained as brown amorphous powder, [α] D 25  + 66.9° (c 0.10, MeOH); HR-ESIMS m/z 665.1273 (C34H26O13Na [M+Na]+, Cal. 665.1271); IR v max (KBr): 3433, 2940, 1601, 1524, 1446, 1360, 1282, 1192, 1110, and 1066 cm−1. 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR (DMSO-d 6 ) data see Table 2 (For further information, see Additional file 1).
Table 2

13C- and 1H-NMR data of 1 in DMSO-d 6 (400 MHz for H, 100 MHz for C)

















6.70 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz)



6.73 (1H, s)















6.86 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz)



7.49 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz)



6.60 (1H, dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz)



6.67 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz)



3.06 (1H, dd, J = 14.8, 4.0 Hz)




2.93 (1H, dd, J = 14.8, 8.8 Hz)






5.11 (1H, dd, J = 8.8, 4.0 Hz)



7.86 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz)






6.55 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz)















7.52 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz)



7.41 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz)









7.48 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz)






7.36 (1H, dd, J = 7.8, 1.8 Hz)



6.78 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz)



10.78 (1H, s)



7.38 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz)



3.75 (3H, s)

Acid hydrolysis of plantain A (1)

A solution (3 mg) of 1 in 10 N HCl (1.5 mL) was heated at 100 °C for 5 min under an N2 atmosphere. After cooling, the solution was removed. The residue was dissolved with methanol, stirred at 45 °C for 10 min. The methanol solution was analyzed by HPLC using Hypersil C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm). The HPLC linear gradient profile was as follows: water (containing 0.5% phosphoric acid), acetonitrile (containing 0.5% phosphoric acid) 54:46 v/v (0–15 min), 54:46–20:80 (15–20 min), and 20:80 (20–30 min) at a flow-rate of 1 mL/min. The separation was carried out at 25 °C. Compounds were analyzed 286 nm. The peak identity of each component was confirmed by comparison of the retention time. Retention times of SAC, plantain A, and vanillic acid were 17.15, 20.52 and 10.08 min.


Eight weeks old male Wistar rats (220–250 g) were provided by the Laboratory Animal Center of Zhejiang University (Certificate no. SYXK 2012-0178). The animals had free access to feed and water, and were allowed to acclimatize for at least 1 week before use. The drugs were dissolved in water, and administered using a 5 mL syringe with a 4 cm long gavage needle through the mouth once daily for 3 weeks.

Biochemical assays

Chronic non-bacterial prostatitis were induced as previously described. Prostates of rats in control group were injected with 0.1 mL saline by an injector, and the same volume of 1% carrageenan in rats of other groups. Seven days after preparing the model rats of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis, rats in sample group, they were orally administered compounds 15, while rats in positive (reference standard) group were. Administered cernilton, both groups for 3 weeks. Rats of normal and negative control groups were administered saline at the same time [2, 4].

After the rats were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β of prostate tissues of all rats were measured by commercial ELISA assay kits, according to manufacturer’s instruction. The samples and standards were all run in duplicates and the data were then averaged. The results were expressed as pg/mL.

PGE2, COX-2, and TGF-β1 were measured in prostate tissues using commercial ELISA kits. All assays were performed in 10% prostate supernatant in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. The levels of PGE2, COX-2, and TGF-β1 in prostate tissue are expressed in pg/mL [1, 2].

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance with the Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons by SPSS 10.0 software. Data were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (Additional file 1).


Authors’ contributions

YSH and QQY isolated the compounds, YSH and MJC elucidated the structure and wrote the manuscript, LPX and YC carried out the bio-assays and brought some corrections to the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Department of Urology, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China


  1. Shan PN, Lu ZY, Ye LH, Fang YQ, Tan SH, Xuan GH, Ru JC, Mao LM (2016) Effect of Tripterygium wilfordii polyglycoside on experimental prostatitis caused by Ureaplasma urealyticum in rats. Med Sci Monit 22:3722–3726View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Wang XM, Wang DD, Wu YZ, Ma PD, Sun G, Xu Y (2017) Effect of Alisma plantago-aquatica Linn extract on chronic prostatitis in rats. Trop J Pharm Res 16:1091–1095View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Weidner W, Brunner H, Krause W (1980) Quantitative culture of Ureaplasma urealyticum in patients with chronic prostatitis or prostatosis. J Urol 124:622–625View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ding HY, Qian WQ, Xu J (2017) Effect of Achyranthes bidentata blume extract on carrageenan-induced chronic prostatitis in rats. Trop J Pharm Res 16:855–899View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Xiong YY, Qiu XT, Shi WJ, Yu H, Zhang XL (2017) Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effect of modified Bazhengsan in a rat model of chronic bacterial prostatitis. J Ethnopharmacol 198:73–80View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Song GH, Zhang QM, Pang BZ, He LJ, Julaiti S, Aisikeer T, Gao X, You LN, Reyihan W, Zhou WT (2015) Effects of different Chinese herbal prescriptions on cytokines in autoimmune prostatitis rats. J Tradit Chin Med 35:211–217View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Jung HW, Jin GZ, Kim SY (2009) Neuroprotective effect of methanol extract of Phellodendri cortex against 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+)-induced apoptosis in PC-12 cells. Cell Biol Int 33:957–963View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Poggio C, Trovati F, Ceci M, Chiesa M, Colombo M, Pietrocola G (2017) Biological and antibacterial properties of a new silver fiber post: in vitro evaluation. J Clin Exp Dent 9:e387–e393Google Scholar
  9. Xian YF, Mao QQ (2011) Comparison on the anti-inflammatory effect of cortex Phellodendri chinensis and cortex Phellodendri amurensis in 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate-induced ear edema in mice. J Ethnopharmacol 137:1425–1430View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin SQ, Zhou ZL, Yin WQ (2016) Three new polyphenolic acids from the leaves of Eucalyptus citriodora with antivirus activity. Chem Pharm Bull 64:1641–1646View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Xiao H, Yin TP, Dong JW, Wu XM, Luo Q, Luo JR, Cai L, Ding ZT (2017) Five new phenolic compounds with antioxidant activities from the medicinal insect Blaps rynchopetera. Molecules 22:1301View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kong LJ, Liang QL, Wu QN, Jiang JH (2011) Chemical constitutes of Sparganium stoloniferum. Chin Tradit Herbal Drugs 42:440–442Google Scholar
  13. She GM, Xu C, Liu B, Shi RB (2010) Polyphenolic acids from Mint (the Aerial of Mentha haplocalyx Briq.) with DPPH radical scavenging activity. J Food Sci 75:c359–c362View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu YM, Jiang BP, Shen SN, Guo Z, Li ZY, Si JY, Pan RL (2014) Chemical constituents from leaves of Cajanus cajan. Chin Tradit Herbal Drugs 45:466–470Google Scholar
  15. Ai CB, Li LN (1988) Stereostructure of salvianolic acid B and isolation of salvianolic acid from Salvia Miltiorrhiza. J Nat Prod 51:145–149View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu SS (2011) Study on the preparation technology and isolation and identification of related substances of salvianolic acid A. Shandong University, Shandong, pp 65–67Google Scholar
  17. Fu M, Wei L, Yu J, Hu ZT (2013) Chemical constituents of Penthorum chinense Pursh. Chin Phram J 48:1911–1913Google Scholar


© The Author(s) 2017