Resolution enhancement of field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) by ion focusing
© Tang et al.; licensee Chemistry Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 5 April 2013
Accepted: 4 July 2013
Published: 12 July 2013
Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry (FAIMS) is a material analysis technology which develops very fast in recent years. Resolution is an important factor used to estimate the performance of this technology. With greater resolution, it’s always easier to separate complex mixtures.
A method to increase the resolution of FAIMS is put forward which focuses ions before they enter the drift tube. By adding several pairs of focus electrodes loaded with DC or RF voltage in front of the FAIMS drift tube, the height of the ion beam flowing into the drift tube is decreased, which improves the resolution of the FAIMS spectrum. The effectiveness of this method is verified through SIMION simulation and experiments. Both the DC focusing mode and the AC focusing mode can improve the resolution of the FAIMS system, with the biggest increase of 37%.
Compared with other methods of improving FAIMS resolution, this method needs neither additional special gases, nor additional auxiliary equipment. It is easy to miniaturize, and can work under atmospheric pressure.
KeywordsResolution, FAIMS Ion focusing
With the social and economic development, the requirement for analysis technology has increased. The detection and analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) are extremely needed in the field of chemical weapons, explosives, drugs, pollutants . People want the detection of VOCs to be fast, highly sensitive, and portable. Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry are the most commonly applied technologies in the VOCs detection [2, 3]. Traditional Gas Chromatography achieved VOCs detection at ppm level with the separation time of ten minutes level .Multidimensional Gas Chromatography improves the separation capacity of complex VOCs but the separation time is a bit longer . The Mass Spectrometry technologies used in VOCs detection mainly include selected ion flow tube mass spectrometer (SIFTMS) , proton-transfer reaction-linear ion trap mass spectrometer (PTRMS) [7, 8] and time of flight mass spectrometer (TOFMS)  which show a detection level of ppb and separation time with the range from seconds to several minutes. But Gas Chromatography or Mass Spectrometry can’t achieve on-site detection for its instrument volume or power consumption. Ion Mobility Spectrometry (IMS) is a very effective material analysis technology, which has a structure of several metal rings in a line arrangement, and shows a great potential to meet the requirement of detection for VOCs. However, IMS separates substances according to the differences in ion mobility between different materials. So when dealing with materials with similar ion mobility, its performance gets worse substantially. Field Asymmetric Waveform IMS (FAIMS) separates ions by using the change of ion mobility from low to high electric fields, and overcomes the shortcomings of IMS (in which substances with similar ion mobility cannot be separated). At the same time, the structure of FAIMS is simpler than IMS, so it is a promising material analysis technology for VOCs detection.
However, FAIMS technology is not yet mature, even after years of development, and one of its major problems is its lower resolution (than IMS). How to raise the resolution of FAIMS has become a hot area in FAIMS research. Currently, a number of ways to improve resolution have been developed. A cylindrical drift tube takes advantage of the inhomogeneity of the radial electric field, which has an effect of bringing specific ions towards a specific location together [10, 11]; but the difficulties in cylindrical structure processing, concentricity in installation, and reduction of the drift tube (a structure of cylindrical or rectangular shape in which ions fly under the effect of the electric field) volume has limited its future development. The company Owlstone Nanotech in Great Britain has utilized MEMS technology to produce a 35 μm minimal-spacing drift tube, achieving high speed of analysis [12, 13]. If Owlstone put the drift time to the normal level and high resolution would be obtained. However, owing to the tiny spacing, the power frequency needs to be over 20 MHz, which is a tough requirement for the power supply. Besides, because of the deep etching in the silicon wafer, it is difficult to control the roughness of the etching surface, which cannot be ignored given the 35 μm spacing, while the electrode flatness is a vital factor for the operation of the drift tube. Therefore, it is difficult to improve the test results of the separation with this tiny spacing design. Reducing the air pressure can also increase the resolution. With a lower pressure, the number of molecules per unit volume drops, which means an increase of E/N leading to an improvement of the resolution . But an additional pump and other equipment will increase the system costs, which is inconsistent with the role of FAIMS as a “mass spectrum under atmospheric pressure”. A longer drift tube can also improve the resolution , but due to the long drift time (the time for ions to pass through the drift tube) through the drift tube, the ions will suffer severe losses and the signal intensity will be low. Besides, the long drift time make the diffusion can’t be ignored while short drift tube has no this problem . Another way to improve resolution which is to inject He or H2 into the N2 carrier gas is put forward by Shvartsburg, and it has great effect in resolution improvement. [17, 18] But, He and H2 gases are expensive, and this needs extra gas cylinders and pipings for the experiments, so it is not suitable for practical use in the future.
On upper electrode 11A, a DC scan compensation voltage 12 and an asymmetrical waveform RF voltage 13 is applied, and the lower electrode 11B is connected to the ground. The asymmetric wave form RF voltage 13 is a high-field asymmetric waveform with an average value of zero. The DC scan compensation voltage 12 is of a specific scanning frequency and range in a certain step. After being filtered in drift tube 14, the ions move to the right pulled by the carrier gas into the detection unit 15. The ions are deflected to the detection electrode by the deflection voltage, so the ion signals are converted into an electric current, which can be measured.
Currently, focusing of ions is mainly conducted in vacuum or a low pressure environment, and researches mainly focus on ion lens [19, 20] and ion funnel [21–25]. In this paper, we extend the applications of these two focus methods to atmospheric conditions.
In an ion lens, various electrodes or rings are arranged in a certain configuration, with different electrostatic voltages applied, to form a transitional electric field in space which can control ion movement. Under vacuum conditions, the ion trajectory through an ion lens is similar to the trajectory of light through an optical lens, so “ion lens” is analogous to a lens technology. But, under atmospheric conditions, due to the interaction between gases and the ions, the electric field is no longer a conservative field, the law of ion movement does not agree with that under vacuum conditions. Through the SIMION simulation (in Results and Discussion), the focusing effect of ion lens under atmospheric conditions is verified. Then, the ion lens is used to the atmospheric condition in this paper.
The structure of an ion funnel is similar to that of an ion lens, but the voltage loaded on the electrode pairs is a high frequency sine wave voltage, and the difference between the voltage phases of adjacent electrode pairs is 180°. An ion funnel also can control the movement of ions, then create a focusing effect. Generally, an ion funnel works under low pressure conditions. In this paper, the use of ion funnel is extended to the atmospheric condition. The below SIMION simulation result also shows the focusing effect. For the pressure condition and focus structure is different, the simulation results of ion lens and ion funnel in this paper is different from that in the references.
Theoretical background for ion focusing with FAIMS
The mobility of different ions under high electric field condition shows different non-linear changing trends, namely, a(E/N) differs for different ions, which allows ions with the same or similar mobility under low electric field condition be separated under high electric field condition. A planar FAIMS drift tube consists of two parallel electrodes. An asymmetrical square wave voltage is applied to one electrode. As ion mobility under high and low electric fields is different, ions will have a net displacement in the vertical direction in a single RF period, which differs according to the type of ion. With a DC compensation voltage added on the upper electrode at the same time, the net displacement of a particular ion in the vertical direction can be made up to 0, which will lead the particular ion to pass through the drift tube and be detected by the ion detector, while the other ions will be subject to annihilation when hitting the electrodes. By scanning the compensation voltage within a certain range, and recording the current values corresponding to the compensation voltage values, we can get a FAIMS spectrum.
The compensation voltage U M corresponding to the max current I max in FAIMS spectrum is the DC compensation voltage value which makes ion’s net displacement zero in a RF cycle. FWHM is the difference between the compensation voltages at half of the peak value (when intensity is 0.5 I max ). It can be seen that the FWHM has a large influence on the FAIMS resolution. The greater the FWHM, the lower the resolution. The reason why FWHM is non-zero is that when the compensation voltage deviates from U M , there are still ions that can fly through the drift tube and be detected, which have relationship with ions filling up the drift tube along the vertical direction.
The height of the ion beam at the entrance is g. However, due to the amplitude generated from ion vibration, the height of the ion beam that actually arrives at the exit of the drift tube is g-2s. Ions within a distance of s from the upper or lower electrodes are neutralized when hitting the drift tube. In other words, the area between the upper and lower counter electrodes is an ion annihilation region.
The height of the ion beam passing through the drift tube is g-s-∆x.
So we can calculate that , so ∆x01 can reflect the value of the FWHM, and also the resolution.
If g > g x > g - 2s.
When the compensation voltage deviates from U M , the net displacement of ions perpendicular to electrodes in the drift tube is ∆x, shown in Figure 3B.
Then the height of the ion beam passing through is g x - Δx - [s - 0.5 × (g - g x )].
At the “half peak position” point, denote the net displacement by ∆x02.
Then g x - Δx02 - [s - 0.5 × (g - g x )] = 0.5 × (g - 2s).
At this time, ∆x02 is less than the ∆x01 without focusing, and the FWHM will be smaller. (2) If g x < g - 2s.
When the compensation voltage deviates from U M , shown in Figure 4B.
The width of the ion beam capable of passing through is: g x - Δx + [0.5 × (g - g x ) - s].
At the “half peak position” point, denote the net displacement by ∆x03.
Then g x - Δx03 + [0.5 × (g - g x ) - s] = 0.5 × g x .
So and the FWHM will be smaller.
Results and discussion
SIMION simulation of ion focusing effect
Intensity corresponding to compensation voltage when the height of the entering ion beam is 0.48 mm/0.4 mm
When the height of the entering ion beam is 0.48 mm, the maximum intensity is 45, and the corresponding peak position is 6.9. After interpolation, it can be calculated that the half peak positions are -7.0875 and -6.55278, and the resolution is 6.9/(7.0875-6.55278) =12.9. On the other hand, when the height of the entering ion beam is 0.4 mm, the maximum intensity is 44, the corresponding peak position is 6.95, the half peak positions are -7.09722 and -6.70556, and the resolution is 6.95/(7.09722-6.70556)=17.7.
It can be seen that after the height of the entering ion beam is constrained, the resolution has been improved. The improvement in the resolution is mainly due to the decrease in the FWHM. Therefore, focusing the ion beam entering the drift tube and reducing its height can help to improve the resolution of the system and enhance the performance of the instrument.
SIMION simulation of ion focusing methods
Through the above theoretical analysis and simulations, it can be seen that focusing the ion beam entering the drift tube can help to improve the resolution. In order to focus the ion beam, we extend certain focusing methods such as ion lens and ion funnel to atmospheric condition.
Simulation results of ion lens
Under atmospheric conditions, we use the collision_sds database in the SIMION program to simulate ion trajectories.
Data of Ion movement under different voltages
Position of upper ion beam/mm
Position of lower ion beam/mm
Simulation results of ion funnel
Simulation under the same frequency with different peak-to-peak voltages.
Simulation under the same peak-to-peak voltage with different frequencies.
Data of Ion movement under the same frequency and different peak-to-peak voltages
Position of upper ion beam/mm
Position of lower ion beam/mm
25 kHz 20 Vpp
25 kHz 40 Vpp
25 kHz 60 Vpp
25 kHz 80 Vpp
Data of Ion movement under the same peak-to-peak voltage and different frequencies
Position of upper ion beam/mm
Position of lower ion beam/mm
20 kHz 60 Vpp
30 kHz 60 Vpp
40 kHz 60 Vpp
50 kHz 60 Vpp
Compared with an ion lens, an ion funnel can achieve a better focusing effect, and the ions are more concentrated. Overall, both the ion lens and ion funnel have an obvious focusing effect on ions going through the focus area. For simplicity, we will call the ion lens method the “DC focus” mode, and the ion funnel method the “AC focus” mode.
Experiment of FAIMS chip with ion focusing
After the simulation of ion focusing effect and ion focusing methods, the experiment of FAIMS chips with ion focusing is conducted. In the experiments, nitrogen containing 10 ppm of acetone is adopted as the sample gas, and the flow rate is 0.96 L/min., the power supply frequency of the asymmetric square wave is 1 MHz, and the duty cycle is 30%. The detection mode of positive ions is adopted. The diffusion time is about 2 ms while the drift time is about 0.2 ms in this experiment.
DC focus mode
AC focus mode
Same focus frequency with different focus voltages.
Same focus voltage with different focus frequencies.
Parameters of ion focusing effect simulation
In the simulation of ion focusing effect, SIMION was used to simulate the change of FAIMS resolution when the height of the entering ion beam is reduced from 0.48 mm to 0.40 mm. The drift tube consists of two planar electrodes with a spacing of 0.5 mm and a length of 15 mm. The other parameters are laid out: the maximum RF voltage is 690 V, duty cycle is 30%, frequency is 1 MHz, gas flow speed is 6.667 m/s, and a(E/N) of the ion is 0.046.
Parameters of ion focusing methods simulation
In the simulation of ion focusing methods, the focus structure is shown in Figure 5. In front of the drift tube, five pairs of parallel electrode pairs are added to form a focus area. The spacing of the drift tube is 0.5 mm and the length is 10 mm. The spacing between upper and lower focusing electrode is also 0.5 mm. The length of each focusing electrode is 0.5 mm and the interval between pairs of electrodes is 0.5 mm. The gas flow speed is 3.6 m/s and the ions are acetone ions.
Instrumentation of FAIMS chip experiment
To verify the focusing effect, the experiment conducts the FAIMS chip with ion focusing conducted in the experiment was designed and manufactured, as shown in Figure 1.
Other instrument used in the experiment is laid out as follow: we used a bottle of nitrogen containing 10 ppm acetone (volume of 8 L, pressure of 10 MPa, Beijing Hua Yuan Gas Chemical Co., Ltd) to bring the sample into the FAIMS chip. D08-1F-type flow indicator (Beijing Seven Star Electronics Co., Ltd.) is used to control the gas flow. The DC scan compensation voltage source and asymmetric waveform RF voltage source are homemade. The DC scan compensation voltage source can provide a voltage changing from -15 V to +15 V with a step of 0.1 V. The asymmetric RF waveform source can provide a rectangular asymmetric waveform voltage with peak-to-peak value of 2000 V, frequency of 1 MHz, duty cycle of 30%.
After adding a focusing structure in the front of drift tube loaded with a DC or AC voltage, the height of the ion beam entering into the drift tube is narrowed, leading to a decrease of FWHM and improvement of the resolution. Both the DC focus mode and AC focus mode can improve the resolution. The resolution is increased by 37% at the most under the AC mode. Further study to improve the resolution and stability can be carried out from the perspective of removing anisotropic ions. Overall, this innovation of focus is simple in structure and easy to miniaturize. The DC and AC voltages are easy to obtain, without increasing the complexity of the system. In addition, this method has no special requirements on the sample material or carrier gas, and can be used under atmospheric pressure, so it has the potential for wide range of applications. Besides, this ion focusing method will broad the way of FAIMS resolution enhancement and might cooperate with other method of increasing resolution. FAIMS works on the base of ion behavior under electric field. The design of the electric field plays an important role in FAIMS performance and will receive more and more attention in the lateral FAIMS research.
This work was supported by the National Instrumentation Program (No. 2011YQ17006702) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21027013 and No. 81102413).
- Kolakowski BM, Zolta´n M: Review of applications of high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) and differential mobility spectrometry (DMS). Analyst. 2007, 132: 842-864. 10.1039/b706039d.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhuomin Z, Yunjian M, Gongke L: Progress on the analytical methodology for biological volatile organic compounds. Anal Methods. 2013, 20-Google Scholar
- Zhang Z, Li G: A review of advances and new developments in the analysis of biological volatileorganic compounds. Microchem J. 2010, 95: 127-139. 10.1016/j.microc.2009.12.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Snow NH, Bullock GP: Novel techniques for enhancing sensitivity in static headspace extraction-gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2010, 1217: 2726-2735. 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.01.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mitrevski B, Marriott PJ: Novel hybrid comprehensive 2D - multidimensional gas chromatography for precise, high-resolution characterization of multicomponent samples. Anal Chem. 2012, 84: 4837-4843. 10.1021/ac300429y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hryniuk A, Ross BM: Detection of acetone and isoprene in human breath using a combination of thermal desorption and selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2009, 285: 26-30. 10.1016/j.ijms.2009.02.027.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Hara ME, O’Hehi S, Green S, Mayhew CA: Development of a protocol to measure volatile organic compounds in human breath: a comparison of rebreathing and on-line single exhalations using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. Physiol Meas. 2008, 29: 309-330. 10.1088/0967-3334/29/3/003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hewitt CN, Hayward S, Tani A: The application of proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry(PTR-MS) to the monitoring and analysis of volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere. J Environ Monit. 2003, 5: 1-7. 10.1039/b204712h.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rudnicka J, Kowalkowski T, Ligor T, Buszewski B: Determination of volatile organic compounds as biomarkers of lung cancer by SPME–GC–TOF/MS and chemometrics. J Chromatogr B. 2011, 879: 3360-3366. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.09.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roger G, Randy W: Atomspheric pressure ion focusing in a high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometer. Rev Sci Instrum. 1999, 70 (2): 1370-1383. 10.1063/1.1149599.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- David A, Randy W, Roger G: Isotope separation using high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A. 2000, 450: 179-185. 10.1016/S0168-9002(00)00157-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alexandre A, Richard D, Ashley W, Andrew K, David R, Billy B: Ultrafast differential ion mobility spectrometry at extreme electric fields in multichannel microchips. Anal Chem. 2009, 81: 6489-6495. 10.1021/ac900892u.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brown L, Toutoungi D, Devenport N, Reynolds J, Kaur-Atwal G, Boyle P, Creaser C: Miniaturized ultra high field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry combined with mass spectrometry for peptide analysis. Anal Chem. 2010, 82: 9827-9834. 10.1021/ac102125u.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nazarov E, Coy S, Krylov E, Miller R, Eiceman G: Pressure effects in differential mobility spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2006, 78: 7697-7706. 10.1021/ac061092z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shvartsburg A, Li F, Tang K, Smith R: High-resolution field asymmetric waveform mobility spectrometry using new planar geometry analyzers. Anal Chem. 2006, 78: 3706-3714. 10.1021/ac052020v.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shvartsburg A: Differential ion mobility spectrometry: nonlinear ion transport and fundamentals of FAIMS. 2013, USA: CRC Press, 210-Google Scholar
- Shvartsburg A, Danielson W, Smith R: High-resolution differential ion mobility separations using helium-rich gases. Anal Chem. 2010, 82: 2456-2462. 10.1021/ac902852a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shvartsburg A, Smith R: Accelerated high-resolution differential ion mobility separations using hydrogen. Anal Chem. 2011, 83: 9159-9166. 10.1021/ac202386w.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guan S, Marshall A: Stacked-ring electrostatic ion guide. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 1996, 7: 101-106. 10.1016/1044-0305(95)00605-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gillig K, Ruotolo B, Stone E, Russell D: An electrostatic ion guide for ion mobility-mass spectrometry. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2004, 239: 43-49. 10.1016/j.ijms.2004.09.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim T, Tolmachev A, Harkewicz R, Prior D, Anderson G, Udseth H, Smith R: Design and implementation of a new electrodynamic ion funnel. Anal Chem. 2000, 72: 2247-2255. 10.1021/ac991412x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Colburn A, Barrow M, Gill M, Giannakopulos A, Derrick P: Electrospray ionization source incorporating electrodynamic ion focusing and conveying. Physics Procedia. 2008, 1: 51-60. 10.1016/j.phpro.2008.07.077.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shaffer S, Tang K, Anderson G, Prior D, Udseth H, Smith R: A novel ion funnel for focusing ions at elevated pressure using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications In Mass Spectrometry. 1997, 11: 1813-1817. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19971030)11:16<1813::AID-RCM87>3.0.CO;2-D.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Page J, Tang K, Smith R: An electrodynamic ion funnel interface for greater sensitivity and higher throughput with linear ion trap mass spectrometers. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2007, 265: 244-250. 10.1016/j.ijms.2007.02.032.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Silveira J, Gamage C, Blasé R, Russell D: Gas-phase ion dynamics in a periodic-focusing DC ion guide. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2010, 296: 36-42. 10.1016/j.ijms.2010.07.019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.