- Poster presentation
- Open Access
An extension of the pharmacophore kernel using radial atomtype fingerprints
© Hinselmann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Published: 05 June 2009
The prediction of the biological activity of a chemical compound is a challenging task in Computational Chemistry and was restricted to vectorial representations of the molecular graph for decades. Kernel functions are positive semidefinite similarity measures that can be defined on arbitrary structured data. This class of similarity functions can be used in kernel-based machine learning algorithms. Interestingly, many graph kernel approaches from Computer Science share properties of traditional similarity measures for chemical compounds, like molecular fingerprints based on paths, cycles and subgraphs.
In this work, we present a hybrid technique derived from the Pharmacophore Kernel  and Radial Atom Environments . Whereas in the original work  atoms were represented by their element number and partial charge, we employ a bounded depth-first-search to enumerate the complete neighbourhood of each non-carbon atom up to specified depth. Therefore, a pharmacophore can be defined by a triangle between three radial fingerprints. This opens the possibility to replace the simple Delta Kernel, which was used for the comparison of the vertices of two pharmacophores in the original work of Mahé et al. , by more sophisticated kernel functions defined on sets of discrete features. We tried the Tanimoto, MinMax  and the Spectrum Kernel  in our experiments. This results in valid kernel functions again, because a valid kernel function is replaced by another.
In the results section, we benchmark our approach against different state-of-the art graph kernels and the Radial Basis Function Kernel using descriptors calculated with dragonX 1.4 on various QSAR data sets taken from the literature. The models were trained using the machine learning library LIBSVM. The results show that our approach improves the predictive power significantly on many benchmark problems.
- Mahé P, et al: J Chem Inf Mod. 2006, 46: 2003-2014. 10.1021/ci060138m.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bender A, et al: J Chem Inf Comp Sci. 2004, 44: 170-178.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ralaivola L, et al: Neural Networks. 2005, Elsevier Science Ltd., 18: 1093-1110. 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.07.009.Google Scholar
- Leslie C, et al: Pacific symposium on biocomputing. 2002Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.