Open Access

Induced in-source fragmentation pattern of certain novel (1Z,2E)-N-(aryl)propanehydrazonoyl chlorides by electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS)

  • Ali S Abdelhameed1Email author,
  • Mohamed W Attwa1,
  • Hatem A Abdel-Aziz1 and
  • Adnan A Kadi1
Chemistry Central Journal20137:16

DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-16

Received: 11 November 2012

Accepted: 23 January 2013

Published: 25 January 2013

Abstract

Background

Collision induced dissociation (CID) in the triple quadrupole mass spectrometer system (QQQ) typically yields more abundant fragment ions than those produced with resonance excitation in the presence of helium gas in the ion trap mass spectrometer system (IT). Detailed product ion spectra can be obtained from one stage MS2 scan using the QQQ. In contrast, generating the same number of fragment ions in the ion trap requires multiple stages of fragmentation (MSn) using CID via in-trap resonance excitation with the associated time penalties and drop in sensitivity.

Results

The use of in-source fragmentation with electrospray ionization (ESI) followed by product ion scan (MS2) in a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer system, was demonstrated. This process enhances the qualitative power of tandem mass spectrometry to simulate the MS3 of ion trap for a comprehensive study of fragmentation mechanisms. A five pharmacologically significant (1Z, 2E)-N-arylpropanehydrazonoyl chlorides (3a-e) were chosen as model compounds for this study. In this work, detailed fragmentation pathways were elucidated by further dissociation of each fragment ion in the ion spectrum, essentially, by incorporating fragmentor voltage induced dissociation (in-source fragmentation) and isolation of fragments in a quadrupole cell Q1. Subsequently, CID occurs in cell, Q2, and fragment ions are analyzed in Q3 operated in product ion mode this process can be referred to as pseudo-MS3 scan mode.

Conclusions

This approach allowed unambiguous assignment of all fragment ions using tandem mass spectrometer and provided adequate sensitivity and selectivity. It is beneficial for structure determination of unknown trace components. The data presented in this paper provide useful information on the effect of different substituents on the ionization/fragmentation processes and can be used in the characterization of this important class of compounds.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-153X-7-16/MediaObjects/13065_2012_Article_546_Figa_HTML.gif

Keywords

In-source fragmentation Hydrazones Fragmentor voltage Electrospray ionization

Background

Several types of ionization methods are available for use in mass spectrometry studies, such as electrospray ionization (ESI), matrix assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI), chemical ionization (CI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), or electron impact (EI). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), as a powerful tool for the analysis, has been widely applied to the analysis of glycoproteins [1], oligonucleotides [2, 3], oligosaccharides [4, 5], drugs and drug metabolites [6], environmental contaminants [7, 8], and numerous other types of compounds [9]. In atmospheric pressure ion sources, e.g. APCI or electrospray ionisation (ESI), fragmentation of ions can occur in the ion source (in-source fragmentation) before ions reach the analyzer. In spite of the fact that this method of in source fragmentation is less selective than tandem mass spectrometry, as all ions in the source will be fragmented simultaneously, it has been used by several research groups [1019]. On the other hand, collision induced dissociation (CID) in the triple quadrupole mass spectrometer system (QQQ) typically yields more abundant fragment ions than those produced with resonance excitation in the presence of helium gas in the ion trap (IT) [20]. Detailed product ion spectra can be obtained from one stage MS2 scan using the QQQ. In contrast, generating the same number of fragment ions in the ion trap requires multiple stages of fragmentation (MSn) using CID via in-trap resonance excitation with the associated time penalties and drop in sensitivity. Another drawback to the IT is the low mass cut-off in product ion scans. This arises from the fact that the precursor ion and the lowest m/z fragment ion must be stable simultaneously in the IT [20, 21]. In the present study, we combine the usage of in-source fragmentation with product ion scan (MS2) to obtain structural information of certain novel (1Z 2E)-N-(aryl)propanehydrazonoyl chlorides using electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS). The use of this approach was designed to improve the structure elucidation power of tandem mass spectrometry to simulate the MS3 of ion trap overcoming the aforementioned drawbacks of the latter.

Hydrazones have been reported as useful antiviral agents. Some acetylhydrazones revealed a remarkable antiviral activity against HSV-1 [22], whereas arylhydrazones inhibited the replication of HIV-1 [23]. Recently, Abdel-Aziz et al. reported the synthesis of a new class of (1Z,2E)-N-(aryl)propanehydrazonoyl chlorides as analogs of compounds 3a-e (Scheme 1) [24, 25] the structure and absolute configuration of this new class of hydrazonoyl chlorides were confirmed using X-ray analyses [25]. Furthermore, these derivatives were also used in economical and versatile synthetic approach for stereo-selective synthesis of novel amidrazone derivatives with significant antifungal [25], and antiviral [24] potencies. Additionally, they can be considered very promising in the perspective of new drugs discovery. Amidrazones were also found to possess interesting biological activities [2629]. Some of amidrazone-containing hetererocycles have demonstrated potent activity in vitro as antimicrobial agents. Amidrazone-substructural fragments were found to be the antifungal pharmacophore of the latter compounds [3032]. Amidrazones have also been reported as precursors of some effective antifungal azoles [33]. Consequently, the efficient construction of these molecules has received significant attention [3438]. Accordingly, in the light of interesting structural and biological results the situation definitely urges for some additional research in their analyses.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-153X-7-16/MediaObjects/13065_2012_Article_546_Sch1_HTML.gif
Scheme 1

Synthesis of compounds 3a–e.

Results and discussion

Chemistry

General procedure for the synthesis of (1Z,2E)-2- (benzoyl/benzothiazol-2-oyl)-N-arylpropanehydrazonoyl chlorides 3a–e. A mixture of benzoyl hydrazine 1a or benzothiazole-2-carbohydrazide 1b (10 mmol) and 2-oxo-N-arylpropanehydrazonoyl chloride 2a–d (10 mmol) in absolute ethanol (50 mL) was refluxed for 9 h. Then left to cool, the formed solid was filtered off, washed with ethanol, and recrystallized from EtOH/DMF to afford the corresponding hydrazonoyl chlorides 3a–e, respectively. The target compounds were synthesized via reacting 4-methylbenzohydrazide (1) with 2-oxo-N-arylpropanehydrazonoyl chlorides 2a-e in refluxing ethanol. The latter reaction produced, in each case, a single yellow product was identified as (1Z,2E)-2-(2-(4-methylbenzoyl)hydrazono)-N’-arylpropanehydrazonoyl chloride 3a-e.

Mass spectrometry

A preliminary MS2 scan followed by a product ion scan of each compound was carried out to determine the parent ion peaks as well as the fragment ions of compounds 3a-e. The data obtained played a guidance role prior to the pseudo-MS3 process for the same compounds. The highly sensitive product ion spectra of compounds 3a-e obtained from a single-stage MS2 scan with abundant product ions and no low mass cut-off, are represented in Figures 1 and 2.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-153X-7-16/MediaObjects/13065_2012_Article_546_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

a) ESI mass spectrum of compound 3a [M+H] + ion (m/z 328.80). b) MS2 spectrum of m/z 328.80. c) In-source fragmentation of compound 3a. d) MS2 spectrum of m/z 119.14. e) MS2 spectrum of m/z 91.13.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-153X-7-16/MediaObjects/13065_2012_Article_546_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

a) ESI mass spectrum of compound 3c [M+H] + ion (m/z 409). b) MS2 spectrum of m/z 409. c) In-source fragmentation of compound 3c. d) MS2 spectrum of m/z 171.01. e) MS2 spectrum of m/z 119.14. f) MS2 spectrum of m/z 91.13.

The fragmentation pathways of compounds 3a-e were investigated (Scheme 1). Introduction of different substituents to the investigated compounds showed marked effect on their ionization/fragmentation pattern. In-source fragmentation of (1Z, 2E)-N-arylpropanehydrazonoyl chlorides that have an electron donating substituent on ring B (X= H or SO2NH2) showed limited fragmentation at the N/-C=O and Ar/-C=O bonds, with increased stability of the substituted ring B. This fragmentation mechanism produced three ion peaks with m/z 65.09, 91.13 and 119.14, MS2 scan of the last two fragment ions produced m/z 65.09 and 91.13 with 65.09 respectively. Whereas, presence of an electron withdrawing substituent (Cl, Br or I) on ring B, produces similar fragmention mechanism in addition to yielding another pattern with dissociation occurs at the N-N bond linked to the substituted ring B producing a protonated fragment with m/z 126.56 or 171.01 or 218.02 for Cl or Br or I, respectively. MS2 scan of this fragment ion shows three ion peaks m/z 91.13, 65.09 and 99.54 or 143.99 or 190.99 for Cl or Br or I, respectively. Ion peaks together with their corresponding proposed structures obtained from in-source fragmentation and MS2 scans for compound 3a-e are shown in Scheme 2 and are also summarized in Table 1.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-153X-7-16/MediaObjects/13065_2012_Article_546_Sch2_HTML.gif
Scheme 2

Proposed fragmentation pattern of compounds 3a-e conducted with Pseudo-MS 3 scan mode in ESI-MS/MS.

Table 1

Multistage MS data of compounds 3a-e by ESI-MS/MS

Product ions of protonated compounds 3a-e [M+H]+(m/z)

 

3a (328.80)

3b (363.24)

3c (409.0)

3d (454.69)

3e (407.87)

In-source fragmentation

65.09

   

65.09

91.13

91.13

91.13

91.13

91.13

119.14

119.14

119.14

119.14

119.14

 

126.56

   
  

171.0

  
    

218.02

 

Product ion

65.09

65.09

65.09

65.09

65.09

91.13

91.13

91.13

91.13

91.13

 

99.54

   
  

143.99

  
    

190.99

 

Experimental

General method for synthesis of (1Z,2E)-2-(2-(4-methylbenzoyl)hydrazono)-N’-(aryl)propanehydrazonoyl chloride 3a-e

Unless otherwise indicated, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). To a solution of hydrazide 1 (0.15 g, 1 mmol) in ethanol (30 mL), the appropriate propanehydrazonoyl chloride 2 (1 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was heated under refluxing temperature for 6 h, then left to cool at room temperature. The precipitated product was filtered off, washed with ethanol and recrystallized from EtOH/DMF to produce the corresponding (1Z,2E)-N-arylpropanehydrazonoyl chlorides 3a-e in 75–85% yield. The structures of all new compounds are shown in Figure 3.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-153X-7-16/MediaObjects/13065_2012_Article_546_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Structure of the (1 Z ,2 E )- N -arylpropanehydrazonoyl chlorides 3a-e.

Mass spectrometry

Reagents and solvents

HPLC grade water was obtained by Milli-Q connected to Elix Millipore water purification system (Millipore, USA). Acetonitrile (ACN) HPLC grade was purchased from BDH laboratory supplies (Poole-UK).

LC-MS/MS

An Agilent 6410 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent technologies, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization interface (ESI) coupled to an Agilent 1200 HPLC (Agilent Technologies, USA) was used. Agilent 1200 series system consists of G1311A binary pump, G1322A degasser, G1367B HIP-ALS autosampler, and G1316A thermostatted column compartment. A connector is used instead of the column to allow direct injection of samples. Mobile phase composed of two solvents: A is HPLC grade water, and B is acetonitrile mixed in the ratio 1:1. Compounds were prepared by weighing the solid substances to 1 mg.mL-1 in ACN. Test solutions for MS were prepared by diluting the stock solutions with ACN/H2O mixture (1:1). Flow rate is 0.4 ml/min, run time was 3 minutes. 10 μl of each sample was injected into the LC-MS/MS. MS parameters were optimized for each compound by varying fragmentor voltage of the ion source for scan mode and collision energy for product ion mode. For optimization of the ionization conditions and of fragment ion spectra, analytes concentrations of 20 to 50 μg.mL-1-depending on the ions intensities- were employed. For screening of mass signals of the different compounds and to search for parent ions for MS/MS experiments, MS2 scans were performed in the mass range of m/z 100–600. Because of the flow rate dependency of the ESI process, ion source specific parameters were readjusted. The ESI was operated in positive mode. The source temperature was set to 350°C and ion spray voltage was 4.5 kV.

To overcome the reduced selectivity problem of in-source fragmentation, a product ion scan was performed prior to the in-source fragmentation to determine each compound’s related fragment ions. The fragmentor voltage was optimized to produce adequate in-source fragmentation; values of 100, 120,140,160,180 and 200 V were tested to obtain the fragments of each compound in the scan spectra. The optimum fragmentor voltage to generate in-source fragments was 200 V. Furthermore, the collision energy used for product ion (MS2) analysis was also optimized by varying collision energy values (4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 eV) and was set to 20 eV to attain the fragment ions.

Conclusions

Mass spectrometry has shown to be an effective tool for the structural characterization of the synthesized compounds 3a-e. This work demonstrated a comprehensive fragmentation mechanism study of compounds 3a-e using the combination of induced in-source fragmentation with product ion scan (MS2). The highly sensitive product ion spectra of compounds 3a-e were obtained from a single-stage MS2 scan with abundant product ions and no low mass cut-off. The detailed fragmentation pathways of all ions observed in the in-source fragmentation spectrum of compounds 3a-e were elucidated by further dissociation of each of these fragment ions using the product ion (MS2) scan mode. The substructures of all fragment ions were unambiguously assigned. The approach described here is simple, sensitive, rapid and powerful for the identification of unknown compounds. Additionally, it can be used to identify trace amounts of metabolites and can be potentially applied to the analysis of impurities and degradation products in complex systems.

Abbreviations

CID: 

Collision induced dissociation

QQQ: 

Triple quadrupole mass spectrometer system

IT: 

Ion trap mass spectrometer system

MSn

Multiple stages of fragmentation

ESI: 

Electrospray ionization

MALDI: 

Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization

APCI: 

Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization

CI: 

Chemical ionization

ESI-MS: 

Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

EI: 

Electron impact

ACN: 

Acetonitrile

HPLC: 

High-performance liquid chromatography.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research and the Research Center of the College of Pharmacy, King Saud University for supporting this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University

References

  1. Kawasaki N, Ohta M, Hyuga S, Hashimoto O, Hayakawa T: Analysis of carbohydrate heterogeneity in a glycoprotein using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 1999, 269: 297-10.1006/abio.1999.4026.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Krahmer MT, Johnson YA, Walters JJ, Fox KF, Fox A, Nagpal M: Electrospray quadrupole mass spectrometry analysis of model oligonucleotides and polymerase chain reaction products: determination of base substitutions, nucleotide additions/deletions, and chemical modifications. Anal Chem. 1999, 71: 2893-10.1021/ac981280s.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kapur A, Beck JL, Sheil MM: Observation of daunomycin and nogalamycin complexes with duplex dna using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1999, 13: 2489-10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19991230)13:24<2489::AID-RCM816>3.0.CO;2-F.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Mo W, Sakamoto H, Nishikawa A, Kagi N, Langridge JI, Shimonishi Y, Takao T: Structural characterization of chemically derivatized oligosaccharides by nanoflow electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 1999, 71: 4100-10.1021/ac990247i.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Risberg A, Masoud H, Martin A, Richards JC, Moxon ER, Schweda EKH: Structural analysis of the lipopolysaccharide oligosaccharide epitopes expressed by a capsule-deficient strain of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Eur J Biochem. 1999, 261: 171-10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00248.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Lhoëst G, Zey T, Verbeeck RK, Wallemacq P, Maton N, DeHoux JP, Latinne D: Isolation from pig liver microsomes, identification by electrospray tandem mass spectrometry and in vitro immunosuppressive activity of a rapamycin tris-epoxide metabolite. J Mass Spectrom. 1999, 34: 28-10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199901)34:1<28::AID-JMS747>3.0.CO;2-#.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Castillo M, Alonso MC, Riu J, Barcelo D: Identification of polar, ionic, and highly water soluble organic pollutants in untreated industrial wastewaters. Environ Sci Technol. 1999, 33: 1300-10.1021/es981012b.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Magnuson ML, Urbansky ET, Kelty CA: Determination of perchlorate at trace levels in drinking water by ion-pair extraction with electrospray-mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2000, 72: 25-10.1021/ac9909204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mauri D, Migliazza B, Pietta P: Liquid chromatography/electrospray mass spectrometry of bioactive terpenoids in Ginkgo biloba L. J Mass Spectrom. 1999, 34: 1361-10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199912)34:12<1361::AID-JMS895>3.0.CO;2-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Putschew A, Jekel M: Induced in-source fragmentation for the selective detection of organic bound iodine by liquid chromatography/electrospray mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17: 2279-10.1002/rcm.1180.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Huetteroth A, Putschew A, Jekel M: Selective detection of unknown organic bromine compounds and quantification potentiality by negative-ion electrospray ionization mass spectrometry with induced in-source fragmentation. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2007, 87: 415-10.1080/03067310601087684.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Gil JH, Hong J, Choe JC, Kim YH: Analysis of fatty acyl groups of diacyl galactolipid molecular species by HPLC/ESI-MS with in-source fragmentation. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2003, 24: 1163-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tian Q, Duncan CJG, Schwartz SJ: Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry and in-source fragmentation of lutein esters. J Mass Spectrom. 2003, 38: 990-995. 10.1002/jms.514.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Carrier DJ, Eckers C, Wolff J-C: In-source” fragmentation of an isobaric impurity of lamotrigine for its measurement by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry after pre-concentration using solid phase extraction. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008, 47: 731-10.1016/j.jpba.2008.03.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Yan Z, Caldwell GW, Jones WJ, Masucci JA: Cone voltage induced in-source dissociation of glucuronides in electrospray and implications in biological analyses. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17: 1433-10.1002/rcm.1071.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Van Berkel GJ, Mcluckey SA, Glish GL: Electrospray ionization of porphyrins using a quadrupole ion trap for mass analysis. Anal Chem. 1991, 63: 1098-10.1021/ac00011a009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Loo JA, Udseth HR, Smith RD: Collisional effects on the charge distribution of ions from large molecules, formed by electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1988, 2: 207-10.1002/rcm.1290021006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Bure C, Gobert W, Lelievre D, Delmas A: In-source fragmentation of peptide aldehydes and acetals: influence of peptide length and charge state. J Mass Spectrom. 2001, 36: 1149-10.1002/jms.220.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Weinmann W, Stoertzel M, Vogt S, Wendt J: Tune compounds for electrospray ionisation/in-source collision-induced dissociation with mass spectral library searching. J Chromatogr A. 2001, 926: 199-10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01066-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang M-Y, Pace N, Kerns EH, Kleintop T, Kagan N, Sakuma T: Hybrid triple quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometry in fragmentation mechanism studies: application to structure elucidation of buspirone and one of its metabolites. J Mass Spectrom. 2005, 40: 1017-10.1002/jms.876.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hopfgartner G, Husser C, Zell M: Rapid screening and characterization of drug metabolites using a new quadrupole–linear ion trap mass spectrometer. J Mass Spectrom. 2003, 38: 138-10.1002/jms.420.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Abdel-Aal MT, El-Sayed WA, El-Ashry EH: Synthesis and antiviral evaluation of some sugar arylglycinoylhydrazones and their oxadiazoline derivatives. Arch Pharm Chem Life Sci. 2006, 339: 656-10.1002/ardp.200600100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Brouwer WG, Osika EM: Anti-viral aromatic hydrazones. United States Patent number 5914351. 1999, Filed: 12 December 1997, Issued: 22 June 1999Google Scholar
  24. Abdel-Aziz HA, Abdel-Wahab BF, Badria FA: Stereoselective synthesis and antiviral activity of (1E,2Z,3E)-1-(Piperidin-1-yl)-1-(arylhydrazono)-2-[(benzoyl/benzothiazol-2-oyl)hydrazono]-4-(aryl1)but-3-enes. Arch Pharm Chem Life Sci. 2010, 343: 152-10.1002/ardp.200900195.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Abdel-Aziz HA, Mekawey AAI: Stereoselective synthesis and antimicrobial activity of benzofuran-based (1E)-1-(piperidin-1-yl)-N2-arylamidrazones. Eur J Med Chem. 2009, 44: 4985-10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.09.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Frohberg P, Kupfer C, Stenger P, Baumeister U, Nuhn P: Lipoxygenase-inhibitoren, 4. Mitt.: synthese und cyclisierungsreaktionen offenkettiger N1-arylsubstituierter amidrazone (pages 505–516). Arch Pharm. 1995, 328: 505-10.1002/ardp.19953280607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Debord J, N’Diaye P, Bollinger JC, Fikri K, Penicaut B, Robert JM, Robert PS, Le-Baut G: Cholinesterase inhibition by derivatives of 2-amino-4,6-dimethylpyridine. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 1997, 12: 13-10.3109/14756369709027660.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. El Ashry ESH, Rashed NA, Shobier HS: Glycosidase inhibitors and their chemotherapeutic value, part 3. Pharmazie. 2000, 55: 403-Google Scholar
  29. Robert JM, Rideau O, Piessard SR, Duflos M, Le-Baut G, Grimaud N, Juge M, Petit JY: Synthesis and anti-inflammatory activity of polyazaheterrocyclic derivatives of 6-amino-2,4-lutidine and their precursors. Arzneimittel-Forschung/Drug Research. 1997, 47: 635-Google Scholar
  30. Mamolo MG, Falagiani V, Vio L, Banfi E: Synthesis and antimycobacterial activity of some N1-[1-[3-aryl-1-(pyridin-2-, 3-, or 4-yl)-3-oxo]propyl]-2-pyridinecarboxamidrazones. IL Farmaco. 1999, 54: 761-10.1016/S0014-827X(99)00097-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Ranft D, Lehwark-Yvetot G, Schaper K, Buge A: N1-hetaryl substituted pyridine- and pyrazinecarboxamidrazones with antimycobacterial activity. Arch Pharm. 1997, 330: 169-10.1002/ardp.19973300603.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ranft D, Seyfarth T, Schaper K, Lehwark-Yvetot G, Bruhn C, Buge A: New N1-hetarylmethylene-substituted amidrazones with potential antimycobacterial activity. Arch Pharm. 1999, 332: 427-10.1002/(SICI)1521-4184(199912)332:12<427::AID-ARDP427>3.0.CO;2-H.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Davies EP, Pittam JD, Mallion KB, Taylor NP: Process for preparing an antifungal azole with hydrazino and amidrazone intermediates. United States Patent number 5861516. 1999, Filed: 9 April, 1997, Issued: 19 January 1999Google Scholar
  34. Drutkowski G, Donner C, Schulze I, Frohberg P: Derivatives of arylhydrazonic acids. Part 2: a facile approach to novel 4,5-dihydro-1 H-1,2,4-triazoles via cyclization of amidrazones. Tetrahedron. 2002, 58: 5317-10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00485-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Frohberg P, Wagner C, Meier R, Sippl W: Derivatives of arylhydrazonic acids. Part 3: stereochemical rearrangement of Z-oxanilo-N1-dialkyl-N2-arylamidrazones. Tetrahedron. 2006, 62: 6050-10.1016/j.tet.2006.04.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Modzelewska-Banachiewicz B, Matysiak J, Niewiadomy A: Synthesis and mycological activity of the compounds obtained in the reaction of N3-substituted amidrazones with sulphinyl-bis-2,4-dihydroxybenzenethioyl. Eur J Med Chem. 2001, 36: 75-10.1016/S0223-5234(00)01176-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Cocco MT, Congiu C, Lilliu V, Onnis V: Amidrazones as precursors of biologically active compounds – synthesis of diaminopyrazoles for evaluation of anticancer activity. Arch Pharm. 2006, 339: 7-13. 10.1002/ardp.200500179.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. El Kaim L, Grimaud L, Jana NK, Mettetal F, Tirla C: Amines addition to alpha-nitrohydrazones: application to amidrazones and triazoles formation. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43: 8925-10.1016/S0040-4039(02)02188-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Abdelhameed et al; licensee Chemistry Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.