Open Access

Cyclic Tetrapyrrolic Photosensitisers from the leaves of Phaeanthus ophthalmicus

  • Pei Jean Tan1,
  • Cheng Yi Ong1,
  • Asma Danial2,
  • Hirzun Mohd Yusof2,
  • Bee Keat Neoh2 and
  • Hong Boon Lee1Email author
Chemistry Central Journal20115:32

DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-5-32

Received: 18 February 2011

Accepted: 20 June 2011

Published: 20 June 2011

Abstract

Background

Twenty-seven extracts from 26 plants were identified as photo-cytotoxic in the course of our bioassay guided screening program for photosensitisers from 128 extracts prepared from 64 terrestrial plants in two different collection sites in Malaysia - Royal Belum Forest Reserve in the State of Perak and Gunung Nuang in the State of Selangor. One of the photo-cytotoxic extracts from the leaves of Phaeanthus ophtalmicus was further investigated.

Results

The ethanolic extract of the leaves from Phaeanthus ophtalmicus was able to reduce the in vitro viability of leukaemic HL60 cells to < 50% when exposed to 9.6 J/cm2 of a broad spectrum light at a concentration of 20 μg/mL. Dereplication of the photo-cytotoxic fractions from P. ophthalmicus extracts based on TLC Rf values and HPLC co-injection of reference tetrapyrrolic compounds enabled quick identification of known photosensitisers, pheophorbide-a, pheophorbide-a methyl ester, 132-hydroxypheophorbide-a methyl ester, pheophytin-a and 151-hydroxypurpurin 7-lactone dimethyl ester. In addition, compound 1 which was not previously isolated as a natural product was also identified as 7-formyl-151-hydroxypurpurin-7-lactone methyl ester using standard spectroscopic techniques.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the main photosensitisers in plants are based on the cyclic tetrapyrrole structure and photosensitisers with other structures, if present, are present in very minor amounts or are not as active as those with the cyclic tetrapyrrole structure.

Background

Malaysia is well-known as one of the mega-biodiversity country in the world. Among the places that Malaysia has restricted their access as forest reserves are Royal Belum Forest Reserve and Gunung Nuang at the Langat Forest Reserve. The Royal Belum Forest Reserve which is estimated to be 130 million years old [1], covers an area of 3000 km2 and is home to numerous plant species as well as over 270 species of birds and 100 species of mammals [2]. Gunung Nuang or Mount Nuang with its highest point at 1495 m above sea level [3] is situated in the Langat Basin which covers an estimated area of 2937km2 and is covered in dipterocarp forests. In our search for potential novel photosensitisers from the under-explored natural habitats of Malaysia, 64 plant samples were collected from Gunung Nuang and Royal Belum Forest Reserve. Photosensitisers are compounds employed in photodynamic therapy to generate reactive oxygen species in the presence of light and molecular oxygen for removing abnormal cells and tissues in the treatment of some forms of cancer and other non-oncological diseases [4].

This paper describes the sourcing and testing of 128 plant extracts using a MTT-based photocytotoxicity assay, and bioassay guided fractionation of one of the active samples Phaeanthus ophthalmicus, identification of known photosensitisers in the extracts by comparing with in-house standards and isolation and elucidation of one new photosensitiser.

Results and Discussion

Screening result

A total of 128 extracts were obtained from the 64 plants collected in July 2007. These plant species are from 39 different families (Table 1). A sample is considered photo-cytotoxic if it causes the cell culture to be < 50% viable when exposed to light and if the % cell viability of the culture with the sample in the dark is more than double the % cell viability in the presence of light [58]. Following these criteria, 27 of the extracts were identified as photo-cytotoxic. Three samples from Garcinia malaccensis (root), Shorea sp. (leaves) and Disopyros sp. (fruit pulp) showed cytotoxicity even when unirradiated (< 50% cell viability in the unirradiated experiment) and therefore were not investigated further in this study. The 27 photo-cytotoxic extracts were from different plant species except for Anaxagorea javanica which contributed two extracts from its bark and leaves. Other than the bark extract from A. javanica and the whole plant extract from Piper caninum, the remaining 25 photo-cytotoxic extracts were all prepared from the leaves. The photo-cytotoxic extract from the leaves of P. ophthalmicus was subsequently subjected to bioassay guided fractionation using standard chromatography methods to identify the photo-cytotoxic constituents.
Table 1

Plant extracts screened for photo-cytotoxicity in HL60 cells at 20 μg/ml

Family

Scientific Name

Plant parts

Location

Activity*

Acanthaceae

Filetia hirta

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Leaves

 

+

  

Root

 

-

 

Justicia ptychostoma

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

Annonaceae

Anaxagorea javanica

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

+

 

Fissistigma sp.

Leaves

Belum

+

 

Popowia tomentosa

Leaves

Belum

-

  

Bark

 

-

 

Phaeanthus ophthalamicus

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

Araceae

Epipremnum giganteum

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

Arecaceae

Pinanga sp.

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Fruit

 

-

  

Leaves

 

+

Aristolochiaceae

Thottea grandiflora

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

Asteraceae

Elephantopus mollis

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Leaves

 

+

  

Root

 

-

Burseraceae

Canarium pilosum

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

 

Canarium sp.

Fruit

Belum

-

Chloranthaceae

Chloranthus officinalis

Leaves

Belum

-

Clusiaceae

Calophyllum sp.

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

 

Garcinia malaccensis

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Root

 

++

 

Garcinia parvifolia

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

Commelinaceae

Pollia thyrsiflora

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Leaves

 

-

Cucurbitaceae

Melothria affinis

Whole plant

Belum

-

 

Trichosanthes wallichiana

Whole plant

Belum

-

Dilleniaceae

Dillenia ovata

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

Dipterocarpaceae

Dipterocarpus sp.

Leaves

Belum

-

  

Bark

 

-

Dipterocarpaceae

Shorea sp.

Leaves

Belum

++

  

Bark

 

-

Ebenaceae

Diospyros buxifolia

Whole plant

Belum

-

 

Diospyros sp.

Leaves

Belum

-

  

Bark

 

-

  

Seed

 

-

  

Fruit pulp

 

++

Euphorbiaceae

Baccaurea parviflora

Leaves

Belum

-

  

Bark

 

-

 

Baccaurea sp

Fruit

Belum

-

 

Mallotus sp.

Leaves

Belum

-

  

Bark

 

-

Fabaceae

Bauhinia sp.

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

 

Bauhinia wrayi

Whole plant

Belum

-

 

Callerya atropurpurea

Fruit

Belum

-

 

Desmodium sp.

Whole plant

Belum

-

 

Mimosa sp.

Leaves

Belum

+

Flacourtiaceae

Hydnocarpus sp.

Bark

Belum

-

Gesneriaceae

Cyrtandra pendula

Leaves

Gunung Nuang

+

Hypoxidaceae

Molineria latifolia

Fruit

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Leaves

 

-

  

Root

 

-

Icacinaceae

Gonocaryum gracile

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

Lasiocampoidea

Barringtonia payensiana

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Leaves

 

-

Leeaceae

Leea curtisii

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

Loganiaceae

Strychnos ignatii

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

Melastomataceae

Phyllagathis rotundifolia

Root

Gunung Nuang

-

Moraceae

Ficus anulata

Whole plant

Belum

-

 

Ficus fulva

Fruit

Belum

-

 

Ficus laevis

Bark

Belum

-

  

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Leaves

 

+

Myrsinaceae

Ardisia minor

Leaves

Belum

+

Noctuoidea

Corymborkis veratrifolia

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Leaves

 

-

 

Crinum asiaticum

Leaves

Belum

-

Palmae

Rattan sp.

Whole plant

Belum

-

Piperaceae

Piper caninum

Whole plant

Belum

+

 

Piper magnibaccum

Bark

Belum

-

 

Piper umbellatum

Leaves

Belum

-

  

Bark

 

-

Pyraloidea

Mycetia malayana

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Leaves

 

-

  

Root

 

-

Rubiaceae

Displospora wrayi

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Fruit

 

-

 

Ixora grandifolia

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

 

Lasianthus bractescens

Bark

Belum

-

 

Lasianthus constrictus

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

 

Lasianthus lowianus

Bark

Belum

-

  

Fruit

 

-

  

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Leaves

 

-

  

Root

 

-

Rutaceae

Luvunga scandens

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Leaves

 

+

Selaginellaceae

Selaginella intermedia

Bark

Gunung Nuang

-

  

Leaves

 

-

Solanaceae

Solanum lasiocarpum

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

Tiliaceae

Microcos hirsuta

Bark

Belum

-

  

Leaves

 

-

Verbenaceae

Clerodendron sp.

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

 

Peronema canescens

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

Vitaceae

Cissus sp.

Leaves

Belum

+

  

Bark

 

-

Zingiberaceae

Boesenbergia sp.

Whole plant

Belum

-

* +: photo-cytotoxic only, ++: cytotoxic, −: no activity

Phaeanthus ophthalmicusas a source of photosensitisers

Phaeanthus ophthalmicus is a small shrub commonly found in shady forest [9]. No literature related to its phytochemical or ethnopharmaceutical uses have been reported for this species. Of relevance to this study, this species has not been studied for photosensitizing activities also. As a genus, Phaeanthus belongs to the family Annonaceae (blumea) which is the largest family of the magnolia order (Magnoliales). The Annonaceae family consists of trees, shrubs, and woody climbers found mainly in the tropics, although a few species extend into temperate regions [10]. Even though the Annonaceae family elaborates a broad array of secondary metabolites [11], the genus Phaeanthus has not been studied extensively and only a small amount of literature related to its phytochemical or ethnopharmaceutical uses have been reported. Among the phytochemical studies on the genus Phaeanthus including P. ebracteolatus, P. vietnamensis and P. crassipetalus, have reported compounds such as phaeanthine, phaeantharine, argentinine, limacine, O,O'- dimethylgrisabine and 7-O-methylgrisabine [12, 13], and importantly none of these compound classes have been used as photosensitisers for photodynamic therapy.

Fractionation of the active extract and isolation of compound 1

Thin layer chromatography (TLC) profiles of active fractions 2 - 17 (hexane: ethyl acetate, 7:3, v/v) from the leave extract of P. ophthalmicus were obtained together with our in-house standard photosensitisers. Pheophorbide-a, pheophorbide-a methyl ester, 132-hydroxypheophorbide-a methyl ester, pheophytin-a and 151-hydroxypurpurin 7-lactone dimethyl ester were identified as present in fractions 2-16 according to TLC, and would explain the photo-cytotoxicity observed in these fractions. The presence of the known compounds in the active fractions was further confirmed by co-injection of the standard photosensitisers with fractions 2-16 in HPLC analytical runs. Furthermore, as none of the standard photosensitisers co-eluted with constituents in fraction 17, this fraction may contain new photosensitisers and was selected for further analysis and purification using HPLC.

A yellowish green compound (1; Figure 1) was isolated (< 1 mg) from HPLC purification of fraction 17. The HRMS analysis of the isolated compound gave the observed [M + 1] peak at m/z 639.2495 (calculated [M + 1]: m/z 639.2455, 6.3 ppm), consistent with molecular formula of C35H35N4O8. Compound 1 has additional 14 a.m.u. compared to 151-hydroxypurpurin-7-lactone methyl ester (2) [14], in line with the proposed replacement of the methyl group at C-7 in 2 with an aldehyde in 1. In addition, the mass fragments observable at m/z 621, m/z 579 and m/z 552 were in accordance with the loss of H2O (18 a.m.u.), C2H4O2 (60 a.m.u.) and C3H3O3 (87 a.m.u.) from the molecular ion. These mass losses of 60 a.m.u. and 87 a.m.u. were similar to those observed by Walker et al [15] for 151-methoxylactonechlorophyll-a, thus suggesting that compound 1 also contained a lactone ring structure. The UV-vis absorption spectrum of 1 showed λmax at 226 nm, 427 nm and 651 nm, characteristic of a pheophorbide-b-type structure [16]. The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 revealed resonances that are typical of pheophobide-b, including a singlet proton signal at δ 11.21 for the aldehyde at C-7, three singlet signals assignable to H-10, H-5 and H-20 at δ 10.53, 9.91 and 8.66 ppm respectively, a vinyl group at C-3 with signals at δ 8.05 (dd, J = 11.4, 17.4 Hz), δ 6.45 (d, J = 17.4 Hz) and δ 6.26 (d, J = 11.4 Hz), and signals for the two methyl groups which are directly connected to the conjugated ring system at δ 3.79 (H-121) and 3.43 (H-21). Due to the presence of the electron-withdrawing aldehyde moiety at the position of C-7, the observed chemical shifts of the protons surrounding the tetrapyrrole skeleton were more de-shielded compared to the reported literature values for pheophorbide-a type compounds [17]. On the basis of these evidence, compound 1 was identified as 7-formyl-151-hydroxypurpurin-7-lactone methyl ester.
Figure 1

Chemical structure of compounds 1 and 2.

Compound 1 has not been reported to be a natural product from plants and no spectroscopic data for the exact structure is available in the literature. However, compound 2 (Figure 1) which has a C7 methyl group is a chlorophyll-a equivalent of compound 1, and has been cited to be found in an oxidised leave extract [14]. Since derivatives such as compound 2 with an exocyclic lactone ring can be prepared by oxidation of the parent pentacyclic chlorophyll-a structure and have been identified in plant extracts [6], compound 1 is probably also derivable from chlorophyll-b which is ubiquitously present in green leaves together with chlorophyll-a.

Conclusion

In this study, 128 crude extracts from 64 Malaysian terrestrial plants collected from the Royal Belum Forest Reserve and Gunung Nuang Langat Reserve Forest were screened for photo-activity in a cell-based assay. Twenty-seven of these extracts showed photo-cytotoxicity at 20 μg/mL and when exposed to 9.6 J/cm2 of a broad spectrum light. One of the photo-cytotoxic extracts from the leaves of Phaeanthus ophthalmicus was further investigated through bioassay-guided fractionation of the extract to yield seventeen fractions. Based on TLC and analytical HPLC analysis with known standard compounds in our organisation, five known photosensitisers were successfully identified in fractions 2-16 as pheophorbide-a, pheophorbide-a methyl ester, 132-hydroxylpheophorbide-a methyl ester, pheophytin-a and 151-hydroxypurpurin 7-lactone dimethyl ester. The photo-cytotoxic fraction 17 consisted of a new compound which was isolated and elucidated to be 7-formyl-151-hydroxypurpurin-7-lactone methyl ester based on spectroscopic data. This is the first effort to study the photosensitisers present in P. ophtalmicus and further characterisation of compound 1 as a photosensitiser for photodynamic therapy is underway.

Experimental

General Instrumentation

Light doses were measured using Nova-Oriel power meter. The 96-well microplates were read using ThermoLabsystems OpsysMR microplate spectrometer. Columns for chromatography were packed using Silica gel F254 Merck Kieselgel 60 (70-230 mesh). High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis of extracts and fractions was performed using Shimadzu system equipped with LC-10AT VP pumps, SPD-M10AVP photo-diode array (PDA) detector while purification of compound 1 was carried out using Waters HPLC system equipped with 2998 PDA detector, Waters 600 Controller and Delta 600 Pumps. Merck Chromolith® monolithic RP-18e, 4.6 × 100 mm HPLC column was used. The High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) of the isolated compound was performed using Acquity™ Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC)-PDA system coupled to Synapt High Definition Mass Spectrometry (HDMS) Quadrupole-orthogonal acceleration Time-of-Flight (oaTOF) detector (Waters Corperation, USA) equipped with an Electrospray Ion source (ESI). The Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) analysis was done using Bruker Avance III 600 MHz FT-NMR spectrometer with CryoProbe.

Chemicals

All chemicals and solvents used were of analytical grade. Pheophorbide-a standard for photo-cytotoxicity assay was purchased from Frontier Scientific Inc, USA.

Plant materials

Plant materials were collected randomly along existing trails from Royal Belum Forest Reserve in the State of Perak and Gunung Nuang, Langat Forest Reserve in the State of Selangor on two separate expeditions consisting of members of the research team, a taxonomist from Universiti Putra Malaysia and the forest rangers in July 2007. The expedition to Royal Belum Forest Reserve was carried out at the northern region near the border of Thailand, along the Sungai Kejar river and the Rafflesia site which are lowlands and hill dipterocarp forests. Expedition to Gunung Nuang at the Langat Forest Reserve was carried out at 221.1 m above sea level along the walking trail near the running water pipeline. Taxonomic identification was performed by Shamsul Khamis from Institute of BioScience, Universiti Putra Malaysia and voucher of the specimens were recorded and deposited in the Applied Chemistry Laboratory Herbarium, Sime Darby Technology Centre, Malaysia.

Preparation of plant extracts

The plant materials were separated according to plant parts, washed and ground. The finely ground plant materials were extracted with ethanol for three days, and extraction of the same materials was repeat two more times. The combined ethanolic extracts were dried in vacuo and kept at 0°C before use.

Cell culture and determination of photo-cytotoxicity by MTT Assay

HL60 promyelocytic leukemia cells were obtained from ATCC and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 1%v/v glutamine and 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco). The assay described by Mosmann [18] was adapted to the measurement of cell viability with some modification. Briefly, test compounds were prepared as stock solutions of 20 mg/ml in DMSO and diluted accordingly in phenol red free culture medium supplemented with 5% FBS before use. In a 96-well plate, extracts at a concentration of 20 μg/ml were tested against 15 000 of HL60 cells per well for two hours at 37 °C in 5% CO2. All test compounds were assayed in four replicate wells (n = 4). The plates were then irradiated with a 300 W broad spectrum tungsten halogen lamp, with the infra-red radiation being removed by means of a 10 cm water column. Cell cultures were irradiated at 10.5 mW/cm2 light energy for a duration of 10 min, which corresponds to a light dose of 9.6 J/cm2. A duplicate experiment containing cells incubated with either the same samples but without light irradiation was conducted to serve as un-irradiated control. Then, the cells in both sets of experiments were incubated for a further 24 hours. Cell viability was then determined with the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium hydrobromide) assay. MTT (Fluka) was diluted to 5 mg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) just prior to use. A volume of 15 μl of this solution was added to all the wells. The plate was incubated for another 4 hours at 37 °C. Then, 70 μl of the supernatant was removed, and 100 μl of DMSO was added to dissolve the formazan crystals. Their absorbance was recorded on a microplate spectrometer at 570 nm, and the percentage of cell death was calculated relative to untreated cells.

Fractionation of photo-cytotoxic extract from Phaeanthus ophthalmicus

Approximately 50 g of the ethanolic crude extract from the leaves of P. ophthalmicus was fractionated by liquid-liquid partitioning into petroleum ether, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate and water fractions to yield 12.8 g, 3.6 g, 8.1 g and 26.3 g of dried fractions respectively. All of the fractions were assayed for photo-cytotoxicity and the petroleum ether fraction was found to be active in the bio-assay and was further fractionated using standard silica gel eluting with solvent in increasing polarity (hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol). The fractions were collected based on visual bands, dried in vacuo and tested for photo-cytotoxicity. A total of 17 fractions were collected and fractions 2 to 17 showed photo-cytotoxicity at a concentration of 10 μg/mL.

Isolation of compound 1 from photo-cytotoxic fraction

Fraction 17 was subjected for further isolation and purification using Waters HPLC system with 2998 PDA detector; Waters 600 Controller and Delta 600 Pumps, eluted at a constant rate of 1 ml/min, in a gradient of 40% to 80% of acetonitril (0-5 mins), from 80% to 100% of acetonitril (5-15 mins) and hold at 100% acetonitril for 5 mins, using Merck Chromolith® RP-18e, 4.6 × 100 mm column. The peak which was eluted at Rt 1.81 min and which had UV-vis absorption maxima at 226 nm, 427 nm and 651 nm was collected as compound 1.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

CARIF is a non-profit research organisation. We thank the sponsors of CARIF for partly funding this work.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation (CARIF), Sime Darby Medical Centre
(2)
Sime Darby Technology Centre

References

  1. Hashim R, Amran MA, Yusoff MM, Siarap K, Mohamed R, Hussein A, Wong CJ: The Environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs) in Malaysia Northern Region: Their roles in protecting water resources. INGOJ. 2010, 5: 167-170.Google Scholar
  2. Oon H: Malaysia. 2008, London: New Holland PublishersGoogle Scholar
  3. Kono I, Nishigaki M, Komatsu M: Groundwater Engineering - Recent Advances. 2003, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger PublishersGoogle Scholar
  4. Castano AP, Demidova TN, Hamblin MR: Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part one - photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. Photodiag Photodyn Ther. 2004, 1: 279-293. 10.1016/S1572-1000(05)00007-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kamal N, Sabaratnam V, Abdullah N, Ho ASH, Teo SH, Lee HB: Light-activated cytotoxic compounds from Malaysian microorganisms for photodynamic therapy of cancer. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2009, 95: 179-188. 10.1007/s10482-008-9301-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Chee CF, Lee HB, Ong HC, Ho ASH: Photocytotoxic Pheophorbide-related compounds from Aglaonema simplex. Chem Biodiversity. 2005, 2: 1648-1655. 10.1002/cbdv.200590134.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ong CY, Ling SK, Ali RM, Chee CF, Samah ZA, Ho ASH, Teo SH, Lee HB: Systematic analysis of in vitro photo-cytotoxic activity in extracts from terrestrial plants in Peninsula Malaysia for photodynamic therapy. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2009, 96: 216-222. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.06.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kamarulzaman FA, Shaari K, Ho ASH, Lajis NH, Teo SH, Lee HB: Derivatives of pheophorbide-a and pheophorbide-b from photocytotoxic Piper penangense extract. Chem Biodivers. 2011, 8: 494-502. 10.1002/cbdv.201000341.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Keng H, Keng RSLK: The Concise Flora of Singapore: Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons. 1990, Singapore: NUS PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Britannica Online Encyclopedia. 2009, [http://www.britannica.com]
  11. Wiart C: Medicinal Plants of Asia and the Pacific. 2006, Boca Raton: CRC PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Johns SR, Lamberton JA, Sioumis AA: Alkaloids of a Phaeanthus species from New Guinea, Isolation of Phaeanthine and Limacine. Aust J Chem. 1968, 21: 1387-1388. 10.1071/CH9681387.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. López-Martín J, Anam EM, Boira H, Sanz MJ, Blázquez MA: Chromone and Phenenthrene Alkaloids from Dennettia tripetala. Chem Pharm Bull. 2002, 50: 1613-1615. 10.1248/cpb.50.1613.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Takashima H, Jin S, Yoshida M, Abe J, Murai A: The Structure of a metabolite from leaves of Winter Wheat inoculated with H2O2. Chem Lett. 1995, 24: 1015-1016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Walker JS, Jie C, Keely BJ: Identification of diastereomeric chlorophyll allomers by atmospheric pressure chemical ionization liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17: 1125-1131. 10.1002/rcm.1015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kobayahi M, Akiyama M, Kano H, Kise H: Spectroscopy and Structure Determination. Chlorophylls and Bacteriochlorophylls: Biochemistry, Biophysics, Functions and Applications. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration. Edited by: Grimm B, Porra RJ, Rudiger W, Scheer H. 2006, Dordrecht: Springer, 25: 79-94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng HH, Wang HK, Ito J, Bastow KF, Tachibana Y, Nakanishi Y, Xu ZH, Luo TY, Lee KH: Cytotoxic Pheophorbide-Related Compounds from Clerodendrum calamistosum and C. cyrtophyllum. J Nat Prod. 2001, 64: 915-919. 10.1021/np000595b.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mosmann T: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983, 65: 55-63. 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tan et al 2011